Skip to comments.Wasserman Schultz: All-Women Team ‘Would Get This Done in a Few Hours’
Posted on 10/14/2013 2:25:44 PM PDT by Olog-hai
Women would do a better job than men of solving the current government stalemate, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) said on Mondaybecause a woman doesnt want to ruin the person on the other side of the aisle or the table.
Why not put Sarah Palin in the room, joked Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), who was interviewed along with Wasserman Schultz.
You know, I would argue that even if Sarah Palin were in the room, that we could find a way to get to yes, because thats usually womens goal, Wasserman Schultz replied.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
I think we all know who win if Sarah and Debbie were in the same room!
Liberal woman just aren’t the brightest bulbs in the chandelier.
Fluken feminazi ditz.
If women were not allowed to either vote or run for elected offices (as was the intention of the Founders), this would be a different (and better) country.
She is assuming all women act like sisters. This is not the case.
It'd take 25 like her to figure out how to change a light bulb.
5 months would be wasted deciding on whether to use a mercury filled curly-Q bulb or the safe old kind.
Of course she's right about this.
Remember how supportive all women, especially Wasserman, were when Sarah Palin was running...oops nevermind.
Walk into any divorce court....oops nevermind.
Sounds like an outright SEXIST statement to me.
Still, it could be true, but it doesn’t sound quite right.
Here’s a test anybody can use to evaluate the accuracy of her claim.
Five guys go out to eat. How long does it take to evaluate each diner’s share of the bill?
Five women go out to eat. How long does it take to evaluate each diner’s share of the bill?
I have about forty years of casual observation that indicate the the women take significantly longer.
Restaurant waitstaff would have a more informed assessment.
Yeah, Pelosi wanted to smother everyone with hugs and kisses.....
What a laugh! Women have taken over the top administrative positions where I work and the whole institution is rapidly going to hell. They only persons these women hate more than men is each other. They are more interested in trying to back stab each other than in getting anything positive accomplished. Yet, should a male offer up a solution to a problem these femmes turn on him and collectively try to destroy him. And yes, I have personal experience to support my point.
Women don’t want to hurt anyone.
Well, Ms. WS might be jolted to take a walk into an abortion clinic, or reflect on reality.
She’s not all there.
This gang of silly people in power are going to make us look so stupid in history.
I mean natural law will prevail at one point or another.
Even health care facilities have begun disposing of drugs properly, to give people a chance to not be perpetually intoxicated.
because a woman doesnt want to ruin the person on the other side of the aisle or the table.
LMAO. There are too many divorced men who have been ruined by a woman on the other side of the table to lend any credibility to this idiot remark.
omfg she’s an idiot. all she’s done the last few years is stew she’s nmot the speaker and hurl insults whenever she’s on an infotainment “media” propaganda show.
women aren’t any better. myth. think clicky, catty high school girls. yeah they all got long so well together.
I never thought of women as a group as necessarily being easy to say "yes" ... but perhaps that's the case when you look like this ...
Depends on who those women are, you idiot. And what it is they’re supposed to “get done.”
“When society collapses, that will be put to the test and nature will reacquaint them with the need for men.”
I suspect that when society collapses women will find out how vulnerable they truly are.
(But if I really believed that, it would be an insult to men)
I spent four years in the Navy working with only men, and have spent my career since then working with mostly women.
Both men and women have a different dynamic, and each has their advantages and disadvantages. I will say that working with all men is easier in some respects because (in general) you don't have to pussyfoot around what you need to say, it isn't a factor (or at least wasn't, for me)
With women, you must be a little more circumspect because there will be a male/female element. I have known many capable women with whom I could dispense with that, once you understand and know them, and vice-versa. In many cases, those are women who I will work my tail off for, because they are smart and capable. I am against women in the military, but it doesn't have anything to do with their mental capabilities, it is their physical ones and all the baggage that goes along with having separate sexes in situations where resources of many kinds may be limited.
That said, I have worked with plenty of women who could make sound decisions and stand on their own two feet.
This hideously stunted liberal POS hack Wasserman-Shultz is not one of them.
God, I hope it never comes to that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.