Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The 1973 October War Shapes Israel 2013 ^ | October 16, 2013 | Austin Bay

Posted on 10/16/2013 12:57:33 PM PDT by Kaslin

The 1973 October War was the Arab-Israeli war Israel almost lost.

Historians generally attribute Israel's costly victory to two Israeli lapses, a successful enemy deception operation and a very astute Egyptian war plan. The lapses and enemy deception scheme still shape Israeli security policy, especially toward Iran and its nuclear weapons program.

Israel's first lapse occurred when its intelligence services failed to detect the size and scale of enemy military preparations. Spies noticed more tanks on Syria's side of the Golan Heights and increased activity on Egypt's side of the Suez Canal. However, they failed to discern the Syrian and Egyptian strategic intent.

Short hours before Egyptian forces crossed the Suez Canal on October 6, Israel's second lapse occurred when its national command authority failed to act with decisive force. Though the spies now confirmed a major enemy buildup, the government decided to wait and forgo a pre-emptive attack.

Egypt's and Syria's military and political deception operation deceived Israeli spies and leaders. Both nations skillfully camouflaged their war preparations.

Egypt's Sinai plan utilized clever combat-engineer techniques and leveraged Israeli battlefield elan. Egyptian engineers would use high-pressure water hoses to breach the Canal's sand walls. A massive artillery preparation would suppress Israeli defenders in their Bar Lev Line fortifications while assault divisions crossed. Once in Sinai, Egyptian forces would remain beneath an air defense "umbrella" provided by sophisticated Soviet-made surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) and anti-aircraft guns. The "umbrella" would ambush over-confident Israeli pilots. (Syria would employ a similar "umbrella" over the Golan.) Meanwhile, Egyptian ground forces would ambush Israeli tanks, counter-attacking hell-for-leather. Egyptian infantry armed with rocket-propelled grenade launchers and anti-tank missiles would hide until the tanks drew close. When possible, the infantrymen were told to wait until they could hit the Israeli tanks from the flank or rear. Egyptian president, Anwar Sadat, believed that even a limited defeat of Israel's vaunted armored forces would have galvanizing morale effects in Egypt and throughout the Arab world.

On October 6, Egyptian forces breached the canal in two hours and pushed beyond Israel's thin Bar Lev Line forts. On the Golan Heights, three Syrian armored divisions attacked two Israeli brigades. The Golan brigades took horrendous casualties, but never broke. Their stand may have won the war, but for the next 96 hours the victory and defeat hung in dreadful balance as Israeli reservists raced to the front.

The air defense umbrellas over the Canal and the Golan took a terrible toll on Israeli aircraft. Israel acknowledged the loss of 102 aircraft, over half lost in the first three days of combat.

Though Israel had lost some 500 tanks (400 in Sinai), by October 10 both Arab offensives had stalled. Israel counter-attacked in Sinai and on October 15 crossed the Canal into Africa.

U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger pressed both sides for a ceasefire, to begin October 22. Israeli tanks approached Damascus, and Syria agreed to the ceasefire. In Sinai and Africa, fighting persisted. As Israeli forces cut off an Egyptian army in Sinai, on October 24 the Soviet Union threatened to send Russian soldiers to Egypt to enforce the ceasefire. The U.S. responded by putting its forces on alert, including its nuclear forces. The war officially ended October 25, though ceasefire violations continued.

The disengagement talks between Egypt and Israel on October 28 were rancorous, but in retrospect laid the groundwork for what became the Camp David Peace Process.

The superpower posturing and nuclear-saber rattling was dangerous, but understood to be diplomatic signals. Avner Cohen, however, contends that on October 9 the situation became so dire that Israel considered using nuclear weapons. Israel didn't, but its desperate national leaders peered into the nuclear abyss.

The October War demonstrated to many Israelis that a decision to pre-emptively strike, deferred by even a day or two, could put Israel's existence at risk. An intelligence failure in a confrontation with a nuclear-armed Iran could be fatal. Israelis compare the shock of the October 1973 surprise attack to the American reaction to Pearl Harbor. Iran's ayatollahs should take note.

TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Israel

1 posted on 10/16/2013 12:57:33 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

In the early going Israel came very close to losing the Golan and being overrun. The situation got so dire that they loaded up their nukes on two squadrons of F-4s and Kfir fighters and were preparing to strike, but the tide of battle turned and the rest, as they say, is history.

2 posted on 10/16/2013 1:05:32 PM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Who but a TYRANT shoves down another man's throat what he has exempted himself from?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.


Unaddressed in the article is Kissinger's pressure on Golda Maier not to strike preemptively, and his withholding of aid to maximize damage to Israel. Both against the instructions of his boss, who overrode his objections to immediate resupply. I'd suggest Obama is no Nixon, so an additional lesson to be learned is not to place your survival in the hands of the US

3 posted on 10/16/2013 2:14:43 PM PDT by SJackson (As a black man, you know, Barack could get shot going to the gas station, Michelle on Chicago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Israel’s miraculous war wins are, well... miraculous.

No wonder considering Who is on their side.

4 posted on 10/16/2013 2:45:52 PM PDT by TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed (Yahuah Yahusha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

A few addendums to a good overview of the Yom Kippur War.

Good sources told me (I was a reporter for a Jewish newspaper back then), that the Soviet Union had 3 airborne divisions ready to go into Egypt to stop the Israeli Army’s destruction of the trapped Egyptian Army (3rd? or 9th?).

Yugoslavia was going to let them use their airspace to overfly their country so that they could reach Egypt by a shorter route. So much for Yugoslavia’s independence from Moscow.

Also told that Kissinger gave the Israelis an ultimatum about stopping the offensive or the US would not come to their aid if the Russians invaded.

Also told that Kissinger refused a flight of 6 F-4 replacement Phantoms from landing at Taejon Air Base in Spain after Spain refused them landing rights even if it meant their running out of fuel long before getting to Israel.

Kissinger reportedly told those jets to continue on without refueling even though it meant their possible deaths after ditching.

Meanwhile, a very brave Spanish Air Force Captain, who couldn’t officially give the Americans permission to land, decided that he needed to take a long break from his command post, thus allowing the planes to land, refuel and take-off before he returned to his duty post.

This guy deserves Israel’s highest medal for bravery (and I suspect that he might have gotten it covertly. The Mossad doesn’t fuck around with its enemies, but it rewards its friends).

A good story and I hope that all of it is true. After Kissinger’s abandonment of Indochina to the Communists, I never trusted him again, and neither did some of his staff.

5 posted on 10/16/2013 3:14:57 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Hundreds of Vietnam vets, with critical MOS, and time remaining on their 6 year enlistment (including yours truly) were placed on 48 hour standby for possible activation. DEFCON 2 was actually declared for military only. Nixon didn’t want to rock the country as happened during the Cuban Missile Crisis. So DEFCON 3 was the public pronouncement.

6 posted on 10/16/2013 4:04:52 PM PDT by donozark (The voices inside my head may not be real, but they have some good ideas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson