Posted on 10/18/2013 9:48:00 AM PDT by Sopater
- Incareceration of those who dare speak against these immoral activities (happening now)
- Public execution of those who speak against these immoral activities
- Entertainment oriented public execution of those who speak these immoral activities
- Throw an absoulute dictatorship in there, and you've got Rome ca 70 AD
The Camel in Sopeater's post at #12...
yep>
I saw a story about school girls warned to stop complaining about sexual harassment by a "tranny" or they would be punished
insanity
I coached three seasons of SOCAL public high school baseball. Very liberal atmosphere. Yet homosexuality was a subject of such derision on the field that I occasionally even had to try and reign it in somewhat.
Unsuccessfully.
It was never so much against gay players, of which there were a few, but against homosexual culture in general.
One just cannot be queer yet be a jock.
I did see the thread: “23 Ways of Poking Fun at Libertarians”
I didn’t see anyone openly declaring their desire to “screw minors”.
Then again, I did not wade through all 500+ comments...
What’s next? My guess is it’s a toss up between bestiality and necrophilia.
In fact, I will do whatever it takes to prevent this from coming to pass.
Agreed.
?
Sorry to be obtuse. The other poster looked at your list and stated they were afraid to ask what might be next:
Easy divorce in the 70s
Androgyny in the 80s
Homosexual tv characters/Don’t ask don’t tell in the 90s
Forced celebration of sodomy in the 00s
Child rape in the 10s
And I said, referring to the post about the Camel’s nose under the tent, that the next thing would be “The Camel”.
This is all about Islam. Muslim boys rarely make it to puberty without being violated. The stats I read were only 10% go unmolested. Americans must accept this behavior to accept Islam.
Oh, ew is quite right.
How have we come to this, where we can even postulate that? But who can say, with all we have seen, that it is not in the queue.
I detest the language commonly used by the perverted Left to oppose pedophilia- it’s wrong because “a child cannot consent.” Although true, it masks an unwillingness to admit a conspicuous, overarching reason - it’s just EVIL. The consent smokescreen puts the onus on the child - but for the lack of consent of the victim, the pedophile did nothing wrong - and completely ignores the existence of objective evil, something that galls the godless Left.
What happens when the definition of “consent” is, by degrees, changed? Does sex with children then, by degrees, become more viable?
2Jesus called a small child over to him and put the child among them. 3Then he said, “I assure you, unless you turn from your sins and become as little children, you will never get into the Kingdom of Heaven. 4Therefore, anyone who becomes as humble as this little child is the greatest in the Kingdom of Heaven. 5And anyone who welcomes a little child like this on my behalf is welcoming me. 6But if anyone causes one of these little ones who trusts in me to lose faith, it would be better for that person to be thrown into the sea with a large millstone tied around the neck.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.