[Political Junkie Too]

No problem. Court will rule that Obamacare should apply to all 50 states. Problem goes away.

See what happens when the court legislates from the bench?

First, Congress passes the mandate on the argument that it is NOT a tax, expressly removes the severability clause, and then requires Congress to participate.

The courts say that the states cannot be compelled to participate, and strikes down that part of the law.

Roberts comes along and ignores severability, says that it must be a tax, because that's the only way the law stands as Constitutional, therefore it is a tax and not an unconstitutional law.

Now, for it to be a tax, it must be applied uniformly across the states, so therefore the ruling that struck down the state mandate is now struck back in?

-PJ

[Paladin2]

"Roberts comes along and ignores severability, says that it must be a tax, because that's the only way the law stands as Constitutional, therefore it is a tax and not an unconstitutional law."

Traitor Roberts also claimed that the law was the will of the people as passed by their representatives (at the time of passage) AFTER the 2010 election that turned control of the House over to the GOPe on the basis of killing 0bamaDontCare.

Roberts is a retard and needs to be impeached WAY more than Warren.

[TexasGator]

Yep.