Skip to comments.
'Washington Bravehearts' Trademarked by Neighbor of Redskins Owner Dan Snyder
Bleacher Report ^
| 10/26/2013
| BY PATRICK CLARKE
Posted on 10/26/2013 6:18:17 AM PDT by tobyhill
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
1
posted on
10/26/2013 6:18:17 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
To: tobyhill
Oh great. Now there going to offend the descendants of William Wallace? Or at least Mel Gibson. And you know you don’t want to piss Mel off. He cray cray!
2
posted on
10/26/2013 6:21:07 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Inergalactic background checks? King hussein you're first up.)
To: tobyhill
What a stupid name for a football team. Geesh it is downright embarrassing.
3
posted on
10/26/2013 6:22:13 AM PDT
by
dforest
To: tobyhill
PC going overboard again.. When people get offended FU is the best response with no apology.
“Braveheart Potato Salad” with burgers on the grill doesn’t sound right either.
4
posted on
10/26/2013 6:23:30 AM PDT
by
maddog55
To: tobyhill
But “brave” is an Indian word!
To: dforest
I believe Snyder is really considering it but if there’s enough uproar against it Snyder will back down.
6
posted on
10/26/2013 6:24:50 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
To: tobyhill
He's going to run smack dab into massive pitfalls associated with "intend to use" aspect of trademark law. He may manae to extract a nuisance fee from the Redskins ownders or NFL, but he isn't going to get much.
Trademark hinges on USE in commerce, and if he doesn't actually start a football team and use that name, then his trademark claim is worthless.
7
posted on
10/26/2013 6:25:37 AM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: shalom aleichem
I think they should be renamed the “Squaws”.
8
posted on
10/26/2013 6:26:58 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
To: tobyhill
9
posted on
10/26/2013 6:28:20 AM PDT
by
dforest
To: tobyhill
As a descendant of Scots, I consider using Bravehearts as the name of a mascot to be offensive.
And will they shorten the name to “Braves” and offend the descendants of Redskins?
10
posted on
10/26/2013 6:32:31 AM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
To: tobyhill
11
posted on
10/26/2013 6:33:37 AM PDT
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
To: P-Marlowe
Washington Schemers
Washington Ponzis
12
posted on
10/26/2013 6:34:01 AM PDT
by
dforest
To: dforest
13
posted on
10/26/2013 6:34:36 AM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Ted Cruz/Sarah Palin 2016)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
14
posted on
10/26/2013 6:35:46 AM PDT
by
dforest
To: tobyhill
I like it because of what it implies about the fight for freedom from government oppression
15
posted on
10/26/2013 6:35:55 AM PDT
by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: tobyhill
I thought sports teams were generally named after something fearsome that related to the local area?
So, why not name the team: Washington Communists?
To: tobyhill
17
posted on
10/26/2013 6:36:24 AM PDT
by
onedoug
To: 2ndDivisionVet
18
posted on
10/26/2013 6:36:45 AM PDT
by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: tobyhill
or just change mascot to the potato of that name (redskin)
To: rigelkentaurus
20
posted on
10/26/2013 6:37:26 AM PDT
by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson