Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AAPS Sues to Stop the Unlawful Revisions to ObamaCare (no delay of employer mandate)
heraldonline.com ^ | 10/30/2013 | Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)

Posted on 10/30/2013 8:29:33 AM PDT by RoosterRedux

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: RoosterRedux

Yes the beauracrats have gone hog wild. This is not the only regulation/action they have taken that is contrary to this law in particular and others in general.


61 posted on 10/30/2013 9:10:51 PM PDT by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Politicians were elected on the promise to repeal CACA-Care. They failed. I will not vote for any incumbent who passed it or failed to repeal it.


62 posted on 10/31/2013 2:30:46 AM PDT by Rapscallion (What he calls "transforming" is actually destroying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

The administration says all existing insurance plans are grandfathered in unless they were modified after Obummercare was inacted yet Obumercare has been modified multiple times by executive fiat.


63 posted on 10/31/2013 4:32:12 AM PDT by outofsalt ("If History teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy
You would think Republicans would be smart enough to.....

LOL

64 posted on 10/31/2013 4:29:16 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s ((If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: XenaLee; All

What if:

We had a republican administration that ruled that cetain friends of the administration did not have to follow the racial discrimination rules, or delayed the requirement for them to implement them?

Would that be all right?

I wonder how the court would rule on the principle of the president’s power in that kind of case?


65 posted on 11/01/2013 7:55:06 AM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

I couldn’t agree more. I know its not a popular position here, but I see no benefit at all from the shutdown. The proper course of action would have been to demand compliance with the law, and insist all provisions go into effect in accordance with what the law says. The Democrats own this...and should be forced to live with the consequences.


66 posted on 11/01/2013 10:05:00 AM PDT by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

They are exactly right


67 posted on 11/01/2013 4:03:42 PM PDT by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy
I see a flaw in your logic: you used Republican and smart in the same premise. Tsk. Tsk. Tsk. Never use an oxymoron it making a cogent argument. It undermines the argument.
68 posted on 11/01/2013 7:04:52 PM PDT by cashless (Obama told us he would side with Muslims if the political winds shifted in an ugly direction. Ready?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

“FYI - seems insurance companies and Obama are on the same side.”

Insurance companies wrote the law


69 posted on 11/03/2013 12:57:20 AM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

“does the employee get that ‘raise’??”

If I don’t I’ll quit immediately


70 posted on 11/03/2013 1:00:41 AM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

The same reason nothing was said about a tax starting in the Senate, which is against the Constitution as well-no one cares!


71 posted on 11/03/2013 4:18:13 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Roberts signed off on this law because he claimed it fell within the taxing authority of government.

Are there any other taxes that the administration believes it can waive for preferred companies?


72 posted on 11/04/2013 10:56:31 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South

You are correct - large corporate entities desire the German model, where healthcare is not a corporate cost at all.


73 posted on 11/04/2013 11:06:02 AM PST by patton (“Really? Have you tried chewing cloves?”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson