I agree with them that it is unconstitutional for the executive to change a law.
That, however, does not prove that those doctors have been injured by a mandate that hasn’t yet taken effect. So, my concern is that their suit will get tossed on account of standing.
I think doctors should claim they are being injured by the law penalizing the doctor if a patient smokes.
Based on what they’ve said so far the Docs just need one former paying patient to swear he can no longer afford to pay the Doc because of the new rules. That clearly hurts the Doc. That’s a stronger position than , say, Roe V. Wade where Roe suffered no actual harm at all-—just thot she might.