Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hagel: US to expedite delivery of V-22 Osprey aircraft to Israel
Jpost ^ | 11/01/2013 | JPOST.COM STAFF

Posted on 11/01/2013 2:10:38 PM PDT by klpt

The US will fast-track delivery of six V-22 Osprey helicopter-plane aircraft to Israel, US Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel said Thursday in his address to the Anti-Defamation League's centennial conference in New York.

NBC News reported that the Pentagon agreed to send Israel the next batch of Ospreys to come off the production line after Israel requested this week that the delivery of the aircraft be expedited amid threats from Iran and Syria. The next group of Ospreys had originally been slated for assignation to the US Marines, a Pentagon official told NBC.

"Israel will get six V-22s out of the next order to go on the assembly line, and they will be compatible with other [Israeli defense] capabilities," Hagel was quoted by NBC as saying at the ADL conference.

(Excerpt) Read more at jpost.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Syria; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aerospace; chuckhagel; iran; israel; military; newyork; osprey; syria; v22; v22osprey; waronterror

1 posted on 11/01/2013 2:10:39 PM PDT by klpt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: klpt

Aren’t the arabs killing enough Israelis fast enough without the Osprey? Do we have to help them accelerate the numbers?


2 posted on 11/01/2013 2:12:43 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: klpt

Huh?


3 posted on 11/01/2013 2:13:15 PM PDT by null and void (I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

No kidding. What has Israel done to deserve the Osprey?


4 posted on 11/01/2013 2:22:12 PM PDT by Jacquerie (An Article V amendment convention is our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
No kidding. What has Israel done to deserve the Osprey?

There must be some reason they want it.

5 posted on 11/01/2013 2:23:46 PM PDT by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Why not just give them machine guns that have reverse-pointing barrels on them?


6 posted on 11/01/2013 2:24:36 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

They have held off a billion Muslims for decades


7 posted on 11/01/2013 2:25:18 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: klpt

I didn’t think we were even still producing the Ospreys.


8 posted on 11/01/2013 2:25:48 PM PDT by Deb (If you wanna laugh everyday, follow Deepak Chopra on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

There’s always leftists in Israel who wil jump up and down with the American flag even if it kills thousands of Jews.


9 posted on 11/01/2013 2:27:55 PM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com/2013/10/04/nicolae-hussein-obama/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Deb

The V-22 is in its third or fourth generation now.


10 posted on 11/01/2013 2:30:09 PM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com/2013/10/04/nicolae-hussein-obama/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

You beat me to it


11 posted on 11/01/2013 2:31:27 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hardraade

It still doesn’t look like it wants to fly.


12 posted on 11/01/2013 2:32:30 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks ("Say Not the Struggle Naught Availeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Re Wikipedia: Israel had shown an early interest in the V-22.[167][168] Reports in late 2009 stated that Israel favored the Sikorsky CH-53K.[169] In 2011, Israel expressed a new interest in the V-22 to support special operations and in search & rescue operations.[170][171] In 2013, Israel was reportedly interested in a possible lease of six to eight aircraft for special operations missions; the type is not to act as a replacement for existing rotorcraft.[172] On 22 April 2013, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel finalized an arms agreement to sell the V-22 to the Israel Air Force, along with tanker aircraft, radars, and anti-radiation missiles.[173] The Israeli aircraft are to be moved to the front of the production queue, delaying some USMC deliveries.[174]
13 posted on 11/01/2013 2:37:55 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Might be the worst investment in an aircraft Israel made since it bought those Czech-built Me109s (the ones with so much torque they swung like pendulums on takeoff and landing). Seriously, what does an Osprey do that a helicopter can’t?


14 posted on 11/01/2013 2:57:01 PM PDT by steelhead_trout (MYOB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: steelhead_trout

IIRC, the P-51 Mustang with the Roll-Royce engine had to be throttled very slowly for the same reason: super torque.

Anyway, the V-22 has enough problems as it is. This deal smells.


15 posted on 11/01/2013 3:09:30 PM PDT by elcid1970 ("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: klpt

The utter ignorance on this thread is absolutely profound.

The V-22 had a very tough development, but its operational service has been stellar.

It has an outstanding safety record and has served in combat in multiple deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Israel wants them because, unlike the armchair morons on this thread, they recognize what a transformational platform the tiltrotor Osprey is.

If you actually saw one fly in person, you wouldn’t say they don’t look like they want to fly, that’s for damn sure.


16 posted on 11/01/2013 3:21:59 PM PDT by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

I agree, there are some deployed here at Kirtland AFB and they fly over my place in the mountains quite a bit, plus I work right near the base so I see them a lot. It is a very cool aircraft. The first time you hear one it’s “what????” it has a very distinctive sound.


17 posted on 11/01/2013 3:25:59 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Hardraade

How is it performing?


18 posted on 11/01/2013 3:30:36 PM PDT by Deb (If you wanna laugh everyday, follow Deepak Chopra on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

They must know what they’re doing. Fingers crossed...


19 posted on 11/01/2013 3:31:52 PM PDT by Deb (If you wanna laugh everyday, follow Deepak Chopra on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
you sir are correct. That was my project when it was in “X” prototype through 1st production model. Saw it through test flights,endurance tests.Was on the runway at Bell when they did a test flight for all employees. S.O.B is stealth, you will never see or hear till its on your butt. Only problem I seen is when they did the ballistics tests on the under belly. You didn't want to be inside then.......now ok
20 posted on 11/01/2013 3:41:18 PM PDT by VF-51vnv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Deb

Just saw it in passing on the avionics intel site. The quick impression was that there’s better engines (power and fuel economy), and models for the Army. Also, it seems not to be named v-22 osprey anymore but v-280 Valor. Seems to be the same plane, though.

http://www.avionics-intelligence.com/articles/2013/10/ge-bell-valor.html


21 posted on 11/01/2013 3:57:26 PM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com/2013/10/04/nicolae-hussein-obama/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: steelhead_trout
All I know is that the Osprey has been killing Marines since the mid 1980s.
22 posted on 11/01/2013 4:18:17 PM PDT by Jacquerie (An Article V amendment convention is our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: klpt

Osprey is crap. Should have been canceled long ago


23 posted on 11/01/2013 4:45:29 PM PDT by montag813 (NO AMNESTY * ENFORCE THE LAW * http://StandWithArizona.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

The utter ignorance on this thread is absolutely profound.
The V-22 had a very tough development, but its operational service has been stellar. ...etc.
**************************************
Thanks for jumping in! I was going to after going through all of the comments, but you beat me to it.

I worked at Bell in the ‘60s and ‘70s, when we were developing the proof-of-concept for the tilt rotor; the XV-15. (One is in the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum) ......I worked closely with NAVAIR and MCAS Cherry Point (a really neat base in NC, where the Marines train on the MV-22) during development and early production of the MV-22 variant, in developing requirement for aircraft logbooks, tracing Flight Safety Parts and Time-Life parts, etc. ....The Marines and Air Force personnel really like the versality of the V-22. A couple of years ago there was an article about several of the Air Force V-22s flying non-stop from the US to a country in Africa and later returning the same way (of course in flight refueling was needed).

I retired from Bell in Dec. 2001, after 36 years and I believe all employees and both Bell and Boeing who had involvement with the V-22 are proud of the product.

Sorry, everyone, for being so mouthy. I’ll try to keep it shorter from now on...


24 posted on 11/01/2013 4:46:11 PM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
hey recognize what a transformational platform the tiltrotor Osprey is.

You know you maybe onto something. The new less complicated "Valor" and Sikorski's X2 variants with counter-rotating rotors and pusher prop, all usher in VTOL aircraft that are quite different i.e. they are way faster than the "Mu" barrier of which some of the rotorheads on this thread could explain better than I can! ( please do so gents! )

We are talking VTOL machines faster than 250 mph, and perhaps now that the V22 is now mature, why wouldn't Israel get on this wave as probably many military roles will say bye bye to the old to embrace this new gen of VTOL's...

25 posted on 11/01/2013 5:03:13 PM PDT by taildragger (The E-GOP won't know what hit them, The Party of Reagan is almost here, hang tight folks....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

http://defensetech.org/2013/10/18/will-the-army-ever-buy-the-v-22-osprey/
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/v-22.htm
http://science.howstuffworks.com/osprey.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_Boeing_V-22_Osprey
http://www.navair.navy.mil/v22/
http://www.marines.com/operating-forces/equipment/aircraft/mv-22-osprey


26 posted on 11/01/2013 5:11:20 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: klpt

I wonder if Chuck Hagel is demanding that in return for another handout, Isreal’s military provide marriage benefits to homos?


27 posted on 11/02/2013 12:00:27 AM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

It might be better for Israel if he did. Because Israel would then hang it up on the USA and get cracking on their biblical promise from God. Not that it isn’t a means of blessing to get helped by an at least nominally Christian country. But while Israel keeps on playing rope a dope with God, they aren’t going to go anywhere eschatologically. At least that’s the way I see it.


28 posted on 11/02/2013 12:07:13 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Lion of Judah will roar again if you give him a big hug and a cheer and mean it. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: steelhead_trout
Seriously, what does an Osprey do that a helicopter can’t?

Fly 24 troops 250 miles at 250 knots (like from Israel to Syria, for example) then land those 24 special ops troops anywhere without a runway, and without parachuting.

Then more importantly, pick them up again post mission.

29 posted on 11/03/2013 3:54:54 AM PST by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hardraade
Also, it seems not to be named v-22 osprey anymore but v-280 Valor. Seems to be the same plane, though.

There was a lot of compromise built in the V-22 because of the requirement to fold up while shipboard.

Take away the requirement to fold up, and you can have larger rotor discs for lower disc loading (reducing the envelope for vortex ring state, the pilot error condition that killed all those Marines,) and a much lighter airframe that doesn't have to pivot the wing which allows for much higher performance.

30 posted on 11/03/2013 4:00:15 AM PST by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

OK. It has a speed advantage. A helicopter could do all that, but not at 250 knots. Thanks.


31 posted on 11/03/2013 5:51:06 AM PST by steelhead_trout (MYOB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Hopefully the one the Israelis are getting (the Valor?) doesn’t have the folding wings (Israel has no carriers) and some of the other advantages you’ve mentioned.


32 posted on 11/03/2013 5:53:56 AM PST by steelhead_trout (MYOB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: montag813; Jacquerie
All I know is that the Osprey has been killing Marines since the mid 1980s.

Osprey is crap.

There was no problem with the airplanes. The problem was with the idiot Marines flying them. Pilot Error was the cause of most of those incidents! It's not a Cessna 172!

But, I guess it's easier to display ignorance...


33 posted on 11/03/2013 6:02:54 AM PST by WVKayaker ("The only place that the left hasn't placed the blame is on their agenda..." -Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Yep, but it would still have some of the other rotor wing weaknesses.

Which it is rather amazing that no one seems to have specifically targetted. Yet.


34 posted on 11/03/2013 9:26:06 AM PST by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com/2013/10/04/nicolae-hussein-obama/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: WVKayaker
C’mon tough guy!!

TELL ME WHERE YOU FOUND THE RIGHT TO SMEAR THE MEMORY OF NAVAL AVIATORS DOING THEIR JOB AND FORCED TO FLY A PIECE OF LATE 80'S CR@P.

36 posted on 11/03/2013 11:21:22 AM PST by Jacquerie (An Article V amendment convention is our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: steelhead_trout
Hopefully the one the Israelis are getting (the Valor?) doesn’t have the folding wings (Israel has no carriers) and some of the other advantages you’ve mentioned.

No, they're going to get V-22s directly off the Bell Boeing assembly line. The Valor is in the very beginning stages of prototype development and is a smaller aircraft than the V-22, intended as a possible replacement for the UH-60 Blackhawk helicopter.

37 posted on 11/03/2013 11:42:37 AM PST by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
TELL ME WHERE YOU FOUND THE RIGHT ...

It's found in the US Constitution, First Amendment. Besides which, I know a few of the Osprey pilots. They love the aircraft! They weren't FORCED to fly anything. Neither were those that flew them into the ground.

I am also a pilot of light aircraft. I've tried to control a rotor wing aircraft and decided that I prefer fixed wings. It is a different animal, indeed!

June 1991..."The pilot, Grady Wilson, suspected that he may have accidentally set the throttle lever the opposite direction to that intended, exacerbating the crash if not causing it.

April 2000... The cause was determined to be vortex ring state (VRS), a fundamental limitation on vertical descent which is common to helicopters. At the time of the mishap, the V-22's flight operations rules restricted the Osprey to a descent rate of 800 feet per minute (4.1 m/s) at airspeeds below 40 knots (74 km/h) (restrictions typical of helicopters); the crew of the V-22 in question exceeded this operating restriction with a rate more than 100% greater.

April 2010 ... The investigation found several factors that significantly contributed to the crash; these include low visibility, a poorly executed approach, loss of situational awareness, and a high descent rate.

April 2012 ... U.S. investigators found no mechanical flaw with the aircraft, and human error was determined to be the cause.


38 posted on 11/03/2013 1:59:14 PM PST by WVKayaker ("Because nothing says “rugged individualism” like heavy-handed big government.../sarc" -Sarah Pali)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker
Yeah, just what I thought. You're a stinkin’ armchair warrior who thinks it cool to criticize better men. Go ‘Eff yourself.
39 posted on 11/03/2013 2:25:45 PM PST by Jacquerie (An Article V amendment convention is our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
Yeah, just what I thought. You're a stinkin’ armchair warrior...

You think? You could have fooled me...

40 posted on 11/03/2013 2:35:42 PM PST by WVKayaker ("Because nothing says “rugged individualism” like heavy-handed big government.../sarc" -Sarah Pali)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker
Hey Walter Mitty, go get a few more bug-smashing hours and pretend you're a manly combat pilot.
41 posted on 11/03/2013 3:03:52 PM PST by Jacquerie (An Article V amendment convention is our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Yada yada yada...


42 posted on 11/03/2013 3:19:03 PM PST by WVKayaker ("Because nothing says “rugged individualism” like heavy-handed big government.../sarc" -Sarah Pali)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson