Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kenny

I have my own doubts about Ken. others have said he is a worthy conservative, so I will go with that. If I lived there I’d go ahead and vote for him despite my own personal doubts.

But I do want to say this.

If Virginia actually elects his sleazeball just disgusting little piece of human debris McCa$$h*le or whatever his name is, I’d move out of Virginia immediately, because that is absolute proof the state is beyond any hope whatsoever.


2 posted on 11/03/2013 8:15:30 PM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: chris37
If Virginia actually elects his sleazeball just disgusting little piece of human debris McCa$$h*le or whatever his name is, I’d move out of Virginia immediately, because that is absolute proof the state is beyond any hope whatsoever.

You're absolutely right. The excuses that McAuliffe outspent Cuccinelli or lied aren't good enough. These are adults playing with America's future, picking a candidate like it's Dancing With the Stars.

8 posted on 11/03/2013 8:23:44 PM PST by Kenny (<p>o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: chris37

In the late 1990s, some of McAuliffe’s business ventures came under investigation by the U.S. Department of Labor, which filed suit against two labor-union officials, both of them with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers pension fund, for entering into questionable business arrangements with McAuliffe.

Both officials later agreed to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in penalties for their actions, and the union itself had to reimburse its pension fund by nearly $5 million.

In one deal, McAuliffe and the fund officials created a partnership to buy a large block of commercial real estate in Florida. McAuliffe put up $100 for the purchase, while the pension fund put up $39 million. Yet McAuliffe got a 50-percent interest in the deal; he eventually walked away with $2.45 million from his original $100 investment. In another instance, the pension fund loaned McAuliffe more than $6 million for a real-estate development, only to find that McAuliffe was unable to make payments for nearly five years.

In the end, the pension fund lost some of its money, McAuliffe moved on to his next deal, and fund officials found themselves facing the Labor Department’s questions.

...and libertarians are willing to put him in office by siphoning votes from Cuccinelli


32 posted on 11/03/2013 10:36:01 PM PST by Baynative (I meant to write a different story in my diary. But that's life, I guess.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: chris37

Ken Cuccinelli is DOOMED. The e;lection will be rigged—he will lose in any case—they called him a Libertarian! and thats a game changer. He could own slaves or be a Pimp with a large house of ill repute and get more votes than a Liberatian! The sleezy Democrat will win and win big! This is a bell weather vote—this means the Dems will hold the Senate and take back the house in 2014—and Hillary will be president in 2016—Who will the GOP run? McCain again? Maybe another RINO? The election is rigged.


33 posted on 11/04/2013 12:08:09 AM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: chris37

My wife and I have said, if Virginia is so degraded and decrepit as to elect Terry McAuliffe, the message from the electorate is that it wants to live in a corrupt, liberal hellhole like the states north of here, and we’re not having it. If we wanted to live in Maryland, we would’ve moved there.

Tuesday’s election will tell us whether Maryland moved here. Be that the case, we’ll be out of here at earliest opportunity.


35 posted on 11/04/2013 1:34:27 AM PST by ScottinVA (Obama is so far in over his head, even his ears are beneath the water level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: chris37
I have my own doubts about Ken.

Your doubts, valid or invalid, are of zero utility.

39 posted on 11/04/2013 1:54:46 AM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: chris37

I suspect McAuliffe is a shoo-in. The demonization of Cuccinelli has an effect on the low-info voters. My wife plans to vote for the Liberaltarian.

McAuliffe wins: He has a solid mandate for Obamacare and his common sense gun control message. People have had enough of the awful bad dangerous Tea Party.
Cuccinelli wins: Voters turned away at polls by Republican voter suppression. Negative campaigning and a weak Democrat opponent. No mandate for you, Ken.


46 posted on 11/04/2013 6:12:41 AM PST by AppyPappy (Obama: What did I not know and when did I not know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson