Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Parents sue California deputy who shot boy carrying toy assault rifle
Yahoo News ^ | November 5, 2013 | Ronnie Cohen

Posted on 11/05/2013 7:29:58 AM PST by Uncle Chip

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: RightOnTheBorder

“I don’t know all the facts but this looks bad for the cop. What I do know is if a civilian shot a kid who turned out to only have a bb gun he would be sitting in jail or out on a massive bond (10% of which he would never get back) while the DA goes over the case. A cop on the other hand gets paid administrative leave.”

This is the age of the government employee, uber alles.

Secure, overpaid, over benefitted, over pensioned.

A disproportionate portion of all government deliberations are spent preserving and expanding the above. School district boards, city councils, county, state and federal.

First and foremost, they take care of their own, and take care of them well.

In California government employees retire at 90% pay, with 30 years service. Including platinum health care for the retiree and his/her spouse’s lifetime.

Obamacare will expand the numbers of government employees.


61 posted on 11/05/2013 8:37:03 AM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: HMS Surprise

When a bill was presented to the legislature in California to require all toy guns, bb guns, and plastic pellet guns be painted a pastel color it was opposed by many in LE and the bill failed.

Why would they oppose it???

Their reason for opposing the bill was that plastic pellets and bbs can still hurt. So it is best that they still look like the real thing.

Translation: LE wants to be able to shoot anyone and claim that they thought that what they were carrying was a real gun and couldn’t tell the difference, even a cell phone.


62 posted on 11/05/2013 8:37:14 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Claud
This cop needs to work on his situation assessment. Wouldn’t at 13 yo carrying a AK in a relatively good neighborhood raise some red flags?
63 posted on 11/05/2013 8:37:46 AM PST by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Some of it yes, but leave most to the victim’s family!!! ;)


64 posted on 11/05/2013 8:44:48 AM PST by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Brooklyn Attitude

I would like to see how he made this determination.

I’m sure the fact that the gun was in his left hand [his weaker hand] and pointing down at the time and that he was only 140 pounds and 5 foot 3 and he was in the process of turning around all had something to do with it.


65 posted on 11/05/2013 8:44:54 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: HMS Surprise

“Career? Right there I think we have identified the problem. The entire legal “system” is a broken collection of corrupt lawyers, politicians, and chiefs of police.”

Best post of the lot! But you have listed Chiefs of Police as a separate element, when, in reality, they are just another group of $h!tball politicians.


66 posted on 11/05/2013 8:45:10 AM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

Yet another facet of the problem. Ask a cop if he is a civilian and see what kind of answers you get. They may not consider themselves military (yet) but they certainly consider themselves separate from the rest of us. That is reflected in the “do whatever it takes to get home” attitude that is taught to police forces throughout the nation.


67 posted on 11/05/2013 8:55:05 AM PST by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo

It would seem that you didn’t get the memo. Just FYI, it is no longer permitted to have an adult conversation on Free Republic regarding any domestic US law enforcement matter.

The rules, at least as I currently understand them are as follows:

1. We must assume either incompetence or bad intentions on the part of any local LE officer, preferably both.

2. We must take the word of the family’s lawyers and lawyer-hired experts at face value. To question their press releases or media spin is both bad form and evidence of poor reasoning abilities.

3. Any prior military experience on the part of the cop is not exculpatory, or indicative of his or her patriotism, courage and character as would be the case in most other contexts here, but rather, is evidence that he’s a “Rambo”
“looking for action in a sleepy town”.

4. Even if there is photographic evidence to the contrary, we have to assume that as in this case, a replica rifle is “obviously” a toy, and that only someone utterly unfamiliar with firearms could ever have mistaken it for a real weapon.

5. Everything the cop in question says is an obvious lie.

6. If you disagree with the hard-line Libertarian take, you are a vile “statist”, worthy only of mockery and contempt. Therefore, you will not be engaged in honest debate.

We are all Radly Balko now.


68 posted on 11/05/2013 9:07:10 AM PST by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ßuddaßudd

Trigger happy is an interesting way to describe a guy that had’t fired his weapon in 24 years of law enforcement work.


69 posted on 11/05/2013 9:08:11 AM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

It is intersting isnt it?
It only takes once doesnt it?


70 posted on 11/05/2013 9:17:30 AM PST by ßuddaßudd (>> F U B O << "What the hell kind of country is this if I can only hate a man if he's white?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
TheDon said: "Mistake in the sense that I don’t think he intended to kill an unarmed kid."

I agree. His intention was to kill a person who was bearing arms, despite the prohibition against infringing the right. It was I he thought he was killing, in the act of exercising my rights.

Had I been the one shot, many would agree that the shooting was justified since there is no way to know the intentions of a person bearing arms. You just get to assume that they mean harm and kill them.

71 posted on 11/05/2013 9:25:20 AM PST by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheBorder
I don’t know all the facts but this looks bad for the cop

Not at all. All the cop has to do is say the cop magic phrase "He made a threatening gesture" and he's home free. It then becomes a "good shoot" and the official police whitewash truck will come and cover everything up. Dead men (or teens) tell no conflicting stories.

72 posted on 11/05/2013 9:31:55 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo
In other words, this sounds to me like a good shoot

I guess I didn't get the memo that carrying a gun (real or otherwise) was an instant death sentence offense.

73 posted on 11/05/2013 9:33:28 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

I didn’t mean I thought the cop would fry, I just meant it looked like he is guilty as hell of murder. Sadly there is a distinction between the two in this day and age.


74 posted on 11/05/2013 9:50:54 AM PST by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheBorder
, I just meant it looked like he is guilty as hell of murder

I agree. Likewise I agree that he'll probably get away with it.

75 posted on 11/05/2013 9:52:58 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not

http://globalgrind.com/2013/02/06/real-guns-look-like-toys-photos/

Anyone can make the guns they own look however they want.


76 posted on 11/05/2013 10:46:14 AM PST by MrEdd (iHeck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: William Tell

In your case, I don’t think his intention was to kill a law abiding citizen. ;)


77 posted on 11/05/2013 10:50:20 AM PST by TheDon (Inside Every Liberal is a Totalitarian Screaming to Get Out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
LE wants to be able to shoot anyone and claim that they thought that what they were carrying was a real gun and couldn’t tell the difference

Alaska boy, 6, fatally shoots girl with pellet gun | Fox News

www.foxnews.com/us/.../alaska-boy-6-fatally-shoots-girl-with-pellet-gun...‎

Oct 29, 2013 - Alaska boy, 6, fatally shoots girl with pellet gun ... The girl died at the hospital.

78 posted on 11/05/2013 4:49:49 PM PST by Alaska Wolf (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: absalom01
“We are all Radly Balko now”

-Actually, I was thinking we're all Andy Lopez and Jonathan Ferrell, now.

Autopsy of police shooting victim Jonathan Ferrell: No drugs, legal blood-alcohol level
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/11/01/4432224/autopsy-released-in-fatal-shooting.html


79 posted on 11/16/2013 3:15:48 AM PST by FBD (My carbon footprint is bigger than yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: FBD

Broken link, last post:

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/11/01/4432224/autopsy-released-in-fatal-shooting.html#

“The autopsy of an unarmed man killed by a Charlotte-Mecklenburg police officer in September shows he had 10 bullet wounds, including five that were fatal.

The report released Friday also revealed no illegal drugs in Jonathon Ferrell’s system. The 24-year-old had a blood-alcohol content of 0.06, which is within the legal limit of 0.08 for driving.”

Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/11/01/4432224/autopsy-released-in-fatal-shooting.html##storylink=cpy


80 posted on 11/16/2013 3:18:42 AM PST by FBD (My carbon footprint is bigger than yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson