Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Political Scientist: Cuccinelli's Showing May Curb GOP Move to Middle
Newsmax ^ | 11/5/13 | Greg Richter

Posted on 11/05/2013 7:33:13 PM PST by randita

Republican Ken Cuccinelli's unexpectedly strong showing in the Virginia governor's race will make it more difficult for moderate members of the GOP to pull the party toward the center, says Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia Center for Politics.

Polls had shown Cuccinelli down by 7 points to Democrat Terry McAuliffe, but Cuccinelli, a tea party favorite, led vote counts most of the night, with Clinton administration insider McAuliffe pulling out a late victory as bigger cities were counted.

"Whether it's one vote or a million, you're governor for four years," Sabato said. Still, he said, "The conservative Republicans will certainly take heart from the fact that Cuccinelli has done better than expected."

The big story, Sabato said, is Republican New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's huge re-election win in a "deeply blue state." Christie took 59 percent of the vote. He's the first Republican to win statewide with more than 50 percent since George H.W. Bush in 1988.

The United States is so politically polarized that it is remarkable any time a Democrat can win in a heavily red state or a Republican can win in a heavily blue state, Sabato said.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: chrischristie; cuccinelli; kencuccinelli; larrysabato; newjersey; terrymcauliffe; va2013; virginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: All

It’s amazing how many stupid voters there are in the US

America is circling the drain...


21 posted on 11/05/2013 7:55:02 PM PST by Rodney Dangerfield (FUBO & your Tranny wife, the DNC, the MSM, Hollywood, Unions, Academia & LIV's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

bump

These articles from the left are entirely predictable hogwash


22 posted on 11/05/2013 7:55:04 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: randita

I’m not moving to the middle. NO.MATTER.WHAT Got it?


23 posted on 11/05/2013 7:57:01 PM PST by jch10 (Shouting from the rooftop, "OBAMA LIED!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To Hell with the GOP-e’s reaction. Vote out the bastards in 2014!


24 posted on 11/05/2013 7:57:41 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita

Good Lord Terry McAuliffe is thanking Bob McDonald for spending on transportation and the great unemployment rate. I never saw a politician give a thumbs up to a different party. Weird.


25 posted on 11/05/2013 7:58:35 PM PST by napscoordinator ( Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney Dangerfield

I blame the stupid libertarians. They gave us 2 terms of Bill Clinton, and now McFraudiff.


26 posted on 11/05/2013 7:58:49 PM PST by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: adorno

Start backing Cruz now and stick with him to the end. The problem last time was conservatives went into the primaries without seeming to have even begun thinking about who to support. And then they changed their mind with every new debate. Time to start organizing now for Cruz.


27 posted on 11/05/2013 8:03:54 PM PST by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: adorno

Based on recent results, it would seem there will never be a strong enough non-stealth Conservative to win, except, perhaps, in/from Texas and Utah.


28 posted on 11/05/2013 8:04:31 PM PST by Postman (Flies get too litle credit. They know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: randita
WTH?

I'm sorry, but I am not sanguine about Cuccinelli's "better than expected showing" "curbing" any drift to "the center."

It's spinach, and I'll not surrender to the Radical Left's redefinition of "the center."

Not being able to beat scum like Terry McAuliffe in the Old Dominion can be explained away any way one would prefer, but this whistling past the grave yard, backing off on the beatings of the Tea Party until morale improves, or whatever, is pure nostrum.

29 posted on 11/05/2013 8:05:50 PM PST by Prospero (Si Deus trucido mihi, ego etiam fides Deus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Hope you’re right, but, “we” (not me!) keep going for somebody who will bring the “crossover” votes, and we end up losing every time. We republicans fail to learn any lessons from those losses. We keep looking for somebody that is “electable”, but we end up with somebody who is not elected.


30 posted on 11/05/2013 8:06:55 PM PST by adorno (Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: randita
"Christie has shown the way," Sabato said. "The question, again, is whether the Republican activists – who are mainly social conservatives, tea party people, libertarians – whether they're willing to embrace somebody as moderate-conservative as Chris Christie."

Should read "...whether the Republican base -- who are mainly social conservatives, tea party people, libertarians -- are willing to embrace somebody as liberal as Chris Christie".

The answer is "No".

If it takes a Chris Christie to win "in a deep blue state", fine. Let him.

But voters in red states won't give him the time of day.

And, if you can't win the red states, winning New Jersey is pointless, isn't it, Larry?

31 posted on 11/05/2013 8:06:59 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael
So what do we get.. I remember.

In the words of Nelson Rockefeller's public relations head, Stuart Spencer, "We had to destroy Barry Goldwater as a member of the human race."

Palin, Cruz. the Tea Party.. we're all Goldwaters now. That's what we're getting.

IMHO, the post of the night.

32 posted on 11/05/2013 8:09:30 PM PST by LaybackLenny (Sarah Palin - Last Man Standing (Ironic, ain't it?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Well, he can’t really thank him for the donor scandal that took a very popular republican governor out of the equation for a close race. Imagine the difference if a non-damaged McDonnell had spent the last 6 months working with the GOP establishment to build up Ken. It would have thwarted the Bill Bolling snub. McDonnell probably could have kept the “republican” virginia beach mayor from endorsing McCauliffe.

But because of the scandal, Bob had to stay out of the race. Which suited the conservatives, since Bob was blamed for the final transportation bill that gave too much to the democrats, and ended up actually hurting republicans in this race (it was supposed to take a “big negative” off the table for our side).


33 posted on 11/05/2013 8:09:49 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Prospero

The more interesting thing is the Lt. Governor’s race. If Sarvis had actually taken republican votes from Ken, you may have expected Jackson to actually win. Instead, he lost by 10 points, getting fewer votes than Ken did. Which suggests that Sarvis, in the end, may have taken more votes from Terri then from Ken.

One thing is clear. A conservative can win election here in Virginia, but not if they can be labelled as a far-right conservative, and not if they can’t get at least the grudging support of the mainstream GOP.

If you don’t want to win elections, that is fine. If you want to win, you need more candidates like Reagan, who was conservative but knew how to appeal to the center.

We need a media that will report the truth, which we won’t have for a while. I don’t mind losing elections, but I hate losing an election based on lies. This was a close race, and it is clear that at least 100,000 voters believed the lies of the democrats.


34 posted on 11/05/2013 8:15:06 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
Start backing Cruz now and stick with him to the end. The problem last time was conservatives went into the primaries without seeming to have even begun thinking about who to support. And then they changed their mind with every new debate. Time to start organizing now for Cruz.

That's fine as far as it goes. I certainly have no problem at all with Cruz. However I believe that he, Palin, Lee, and PERHAPS Sen. Paul need to retreat to the 2013 equivalent of the "smoky back room", out of the sight of you, me, and the media, break the huddle, and come out united.

Granted each and every one of them have egos. I do, however, believe that they all know what's at stake and therefore have the capacity to check said egos at the door for the sake of The Republic.

35 posted on 11/05/2013 8:24:16 PM PST by LaybackLenny (Sarah Palin - Last Man Standing (Ironic, ain't it?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: adorno

We were split then. We are split now but I see signs of coalescence around certain conservatives candidates. For instance Cruze, Paul, or Lee could win IF we get behind ONE of them early. But that is the key. And here is one other thing, if you are running and are not first or second after a few races Get Out Of The Race so a conservative can win! Simple.


36 posted on 11/05/2013 8:24:20 PM PST by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Libertarian stalkhorse sealed Viginia’s demo-gubnatorial victory.


37 posted on 11/05/2013 8:28:43 PM PST by mosesdapoet (Serious contribution pause.Please continue onto meaningless venting no one reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: LaybackLenny

I’m not worried about the rest of them. I don’t think Palin or Lee could win the general election. I think Cruz can. And I’m not a fan of Paul’s libertarian views when they differ from traditional, Reaganesque conservative thought.


38 posted on 11/05/2013 8:40:36 PM PST by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: randita
"The conservative Republicans will certainly take heart from the fact that Cuccinelli has done better than expected."

Better than expected by WHOM? Conservatives knew he'd do well, it's the media and folks like Sabato who didn't expect much! I'm sure the fact that he would have WON without the third party candidate scares the bejeezus out of the RINOs.

39 posted on 11/05/2013 8:43:07 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

Especially when it’s as good of a guy as Cuccinelli is. I find it almost impossible not to like the guy. And they did NOTHING for him. Against an outright crook.


40 posted on 11/05/2013 8:43:15 PM PST by CaspersGh0sts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson