Skip to comments.Pakistan 'ready to deliver nuclear weapons to Saudi Arabia'
Posted on 11/07/2013 1:57:38 AM PST by markomalley
Saudi Arabia has a secret deal with Pakistan offering funding for Islamabads nuclear weapons programme in return for access to warheads, according to the BBCs Newsnight show.
Rumours of a deal have long circulated in the Middle East, amid Saudi anxiety at its principal regional rival Iran developing a Shia bomb.
Fresh details emerged on the eve of talks in Geneva to find a deal on Iran's nuclear capabilities.
Citing American intelligence reports and a former Pakistani security officer, the BBC said nuclear weapons made in Pakistan for Saudi Arabia were ready for delivery.
However, the Pakistan government dismissed the reports as baseless and AQ Khan, the nuclear scientist accused of selling atomic secrets to Libya and North Korea, said such a deal would harm the interests of both countries.
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
Sand monkeys with NUKES... What could go WRONG?....
Saudis with nukes is like giving pyromaniacs gasoline.
Why do I see a whole bunch of trinitite showing up in the future?
Seriously though, for decades the middle east has always been considered ‘the’ world’s flash point because tempers run so hot there and so many of them don’t think beyond today and getting their own ‘way’. And of course as had been mentioned earlier on this site the poorest of the moslems think that the fastest way to ‘paradise’ and the 72 virgins and houris is to go around killing Jews and the other varieties of infidels.
So with that mindset and historical way of looking at the world and having nuclear weapons available means that they aren’t considered a ‘deterrent’ so much as they are considered in the same league as a much larger ‘truck bomb’.
To my mind that means the will be used, the question is where and when?
The nonproliferation treaty has been shattered ages ago. You cannot have treaties and muslims in the same world.
Simply not possible.
Tel Aviv, maybe London, Moscow. Maybe somewhere in the States.
Eventually someone is going to get their hands on one, and they will use it somewhere. It’s not a matter of if, it’s a matter of when.
“the poorest of the Muslims think that the fastest way to paradise and the 72 virgins” snip “to go around killing Jews and the other varieties of infidels.”
Suicide is not just for the poor. The World Trade Center attackers and several suicide bombers were from privileged upper classes. Also, the Jews have less to fear from a nuclear armed Saudi Arabia or Iran than the Iranians and Saudis. The Arabs respect the Jews but they don’t fear them as they know as long as they don’t attack they won’t be attacked. But they fear each other because they know when the other side (Sunnis/Shia) gets the bomb they’ll first use it to eliminate each other.
The Arabs respect the Jews but they dont fear them as they know as long as they dont attack they wont be attacked. But they fear each other because they know when the other side (Sunnis/Shia) gets the bomb theyll first use it to eliminate each other.
Good points, sectarian violence does seem to be worse doesn’t it?
While Americans consider Baseball or football as sport, the Islamics enjoy killing each other or beating their wives and stoning them as their sport.
Sound insight. Thanks.
These guys hate the Iranians. They want a bomb to offset the ones across the Gulf. They really haven’t had a big beef with Israel in decades.
Even greater urgency to stop irans development
Another Hillary Clinton success story.
After reading this you can see why liberals hate Palin. What’s Palin ever done?
They’ll be used locally and the likely targets will be in Iran and SA. They can always kill Jews later, after they’ve conquered each other.
Sort of like our own monkey with grenades, in the WH
You forgot the most important feature of the WTC attackers...they were Saudis.
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
You forgot the most important feature of the WTC attackers...they were Saudis. “
In many ways the Saudi government is reminiscent of the Soviet government; old men more interested in their comfort, prestige and power than their ideology. Both governments actively promoted an ideology they didnt believe in, or at least didnt demonstrate by living it. Nobody, other than Shias, have anything to fear from the Saudi government. But the Saudi true believers are dangerous to the bone. The government may not realize that the ideology, unlike the Soviets communism, that theyve promoted in their own people is at least as dangerous to them as it is to the western world.
The Saudi government probably envisions using Pakistani nukes as a permanent mutual assured destruction mechanism to hold Iran at bay. But both cultures are teetering on becoming rabid suicide cults with the bomb. The Shias will incinerate the Sunnis as soon as look at them. But the Sunnis will fire second, which in the world of nukes, may mean not at all. (This is probably why the Saudis are negotiating to purchase German made submarines so they can have a second launch capability.)
As long as they keep the nuke strikes in the population centers and avoid the oil fields,sounds OK to me.
islamics = Moslems.
Well, Iran has had about 10 years to refine and make bombs.
As far as I know they haven’t tested yet. I’m sure they are getting help from the Norks. Perhaps the last test was theirs.
As long as Iran has a bomb, they will not use it directly. Iran has always fought wars by proxy. They will give a bomb or two to Hezbollah, or Al’Qaeda, and a city will go up.
The thing that worries me the most are small aircraft, and boats. Would not take much to carry it on a small rubber raft some miles offshore at night into a big port city. Like Seattle, or San Francisco, New York, DC, etc.
I have often wondered why the left think Hillary is the most qualified person alive to be president of the US? I can't think of one single (public service) accomplishment. All I see is a horrendous record of failure. Losing the middle east to radical Islam and Russia being her most recent "accomplishment". I don't think the US dollar can take much more of this.
I suspect that this is SA’s way of making it clear that the Obama Admins approach is unacceptable. They don’t trust him and neither should we.
They generally support her over her “feminist” bona fides, but there aren’t any. She followed Bill like a lovelorn sheep. She did the dirty work in collecting monies once his political career took off. She even had a baby for Bill, to cover all of his philandering. He had to seem like a good husband and father.
Since then, all her “achievements” are a direct result of her husbands offices and positions in government. Her jobs in Arkansas, her attempt at Hillarycare which we luckily dodged, her election not to Arkansas’ or Illinois’ Senate seat, but to NY’s where she is a carpetbagger (but tight with the moneyed elites), finally she lost her first run at the Presidency and got the booby-prize of being Sect. of State to an anti-American, anti-colonial, anti-stability and pro-Islamist Barak Obama. She then failed at a new détente with Russia, blew the ME up into the least stable its been since the 1960/70s, and made America a laughingstock to the international community. Wow, great resume of losing.
We’d never have heard of Hillary Clinton, but for Bill. She’s ridden his coattails all the way, yet she’s the feminist ideal. Is it a mental illness or are they that mind-blind?
Yes to both questions!!!
And President Obama is working to take our own arsenal down to ZERO, wants to end new weapons development/production, and has essentially said that a nuclear response is off the table regardless of anything that happens on his witch.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.