Skip to comments.Pakistan 'ready to deliver nuclear weapons to Saudi Arabia'
Posted on 11/07/2013 1:57:38 AM PST by markomalley
Saudi Arabia has a secret deal with Pakistan offering funding for Islamabads nuclear weapons programme in return for access to warheads, according to the BBCs Newsnight show.
Rumours of a deal have long circulated in the Middle East, amid Saudi anxiety at its principal regional rival Iran developing a Shia bomb.
Fresh details emerged on the eve of talks in Geneva to find a deal on Iran's nuclear capabilities.
Citing American intelligence reports and a former Pakistani security officer, the BBC said nuclear weapons made in Pakistan for Saudi Arabia were ready for delivery.
However, the Pakistan government dismissed the reports as baseless and AQ Khan, the nuclear scientist accused of selling atomic secrets to Libya and North Korea, said such a deal would harm the interests of both countries.
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
islamics = Moslems.
Well, Iran has had about 10 years to refine and make bombs.
As far as I know they haven’t tested yet. I’m sure they are getting help from the Norks. Perhaps the last test was theirs.
As long as Iran has a bomb, they will not use it directly. Iran has always fought wars by proxy. They will give a bomb or two to Hezbollah, or Al’Qaeda, and a city will go up.
The thing that worries me the most are small aircraft, and boats. Would not take much to carry it on a small rubber raft some miles offshore at night into a big port city. Like Seattle, or San Francisco, New York, DC, etc.
I have often wondered why the left think Hillary is the most qualified person alive to be president of the US? I can't think of one single (public service) accomplishment. All I see is a horrendous record of failure. Losing the middle east to radical Islam and Russia being her most recent "accomplishment". I don't think the US dollar can take much more of this.
I suspect that this is SA’s way of making it clear that the Obama Admins approach is unacceptable. They don’t trust him and neither should we.
They generally support her over her “feminist” bona fides, but there aren’t any. She followed Bill like a lovelorn sheep. She did the dirty work in collecting monies once his political career took off. She even had a baby for Bill, to cover all of his philandering. He had to seem like a good husband and father.
Since then, all her “achievements” are a direct result of her husbands offices and positions in government. Her jobs in Arkansas, her attempt at Hillarycare which we luckily dodged, her election not to Arkansas’ or Illinois’ Senate seat, but to NY’s where she is a carpetbagger (but tight with the moneyed elites), finally she lost her first run at the Presidency and got the booby-prize of being Sect. of State to an anti-American, anti-colonial, anti-stability and pro-Islamist Barak Obama. She then failed at a new détente with Russia, blew the ME up into the least stable its been since the 1960/70s, and made America a laughingstock to the international community. Wow, great resume of losing.
We’d never have heard of Hillary Clinton, but for Bill. She’s ridden his coattails all the way, yet she’s the feminist ideal. Is it a mental illness or are they that mind-blind?
Yes to both questions!!!
And President Obama is working to take our own arsenal down to ZERO, wants to end new weapons development/production, and has essentially said that a nuclear response is off the table regardless of anything that happens on his witch.