Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UC BERKELEY STUDENT GOVERNMENT BANS TERM ‘ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT’
The College FIx ^ | 8 Nov 2013 | JENNIFER KABBANY

Posted on 11/08/2013 3:28:24 PM PST by mandaladon

The UC Berkeley student government has banned the term “illegal immigrant” from its discourse, deeming the phrase racist, offensive, unfair and derogatory.

In an unanimous vote, student senators passed a resolution that stated the word “illegal” is “racially charged,” “dehumanizes” people, and contributes to “punitive and discriminatory actions aimed primarily at immigrants and communities of color.”

The “resolution in support of drop the I-word campaign” was approved 18 to 0 with one abstention on Oct. 30, according to a copy of the meeting’s minutes obtained by The College Fix.

Its approval marks at least the second time this semester that a public university’s student government has voted to eradicate the phrase. UCLA passed a nearly identical measure in late August.

There are an estimated 900 students in the country illegally who are currently enrolled in the 10-campus, University of California system, according to UC officials. These students live in “fear” because former Homeland Security secretary Janet Napolitano is now president of the UC system, according to the resolution, which aims to “create a safe campus environment for all students.”

“The ‘I’ word is legally inaccurate since being out of status is a civil rather than criminal infraction,” states the resolution, which notes some journalists have stopped using the term.

“No human being is illegal,” the resolution continues. “ ‘Foreign nationals,’ ‘undocumented immigrants,’ ‘immigrants without papers’ and ‘immigrants seeking status’ are examples of terms we can use that do not dehumanize people.”

The resolution also calls for administrators and faculty to attend an “UndocuAlly training workshop.”

(Excerpt) Read more at thecollegefix.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: academia; foreigner; illegal; illegalalien; illegals; leftismoncampus; liberalfascism; obamaca; speechcodes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: mandaladon

Fine by me. Just call them criminals.


41 posted on 11/08/2013 4:50:23 PM PST by chae (I was anti-Obama before it was cool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

They are coming through sophisticated tunnels now, so I guess we have to call them “drybacks”


42 posted on 11/08/2013 4:51:05 PM PST by ImNotLying (Obama's Biggest Lie: If you like your Constitution, you can keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

The correct term is “illegal alien.”


43 posted on 11/08/2013 4:51:57 PM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

Ah, you pointed it out before I did!


44 posted on 11/08/2013 4:53:11 PM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

I guess they’re still OK with wetback?


45 posted on 11/08/2013 5:01:02 PM PST by cherokee1 (skip the names---just kick the buttz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Foreign Criminal Alien


46 posted on 11/08/2013 5:16:19 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

fine, “foreign invaders” it is.


47 posted on 11/08/2013 5:18:23 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImNotLying
My how times have changed. They went from wetbacks to illegal immigrants to illegal aliens to Obama voters.

You left out "protected class".
48 posted on 11/08/2013 5:19:20 PM PST by 867V309 (Obama- he's just crazy enough to do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

“No human being is illegal,”

Technically true...but irrelevant sophistry. It is their location that is illegal.


49 posted on 11/08/2013 5:26:22 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

after they pick up a dictionary (a foreign language book to many of these so-called students) and see the definition of “illegal” and “immigrant” or “alien”, they should also pick up and read a copy of the Constitution of the USA (perhaps for the first time).

Then they must read the “Bill of Rights” esp. the First Amendment. Nah, that won’t happen in their miserable lifetime. They are so anally PC that you couldn’t get a colonoscope in there.

The “Free Speech Movement” in Berkeley, was, in part, Mario Savio anarchy and Communist Party totalitarianism, led by Bettina Aptheker, CPUSA, and daughter of Party theoretician Herbert Aptheker (Moscow’s so-called Party ideologue master).

Bettina’s name was unaffectionally “Bettina Batcrapper”.

I once asked old Herb, before an audience of about 500 people at a Temple Un. guest speaker’s program, about his talk on “self determination of people”.

I asked him that since he was so in favor of the “self determination of people” against repression, was he also in favor of the rights of the people of Hungary in 1956 to rise up against their Soviet/Communist slavemasters in order to exercise their right of “self-determination”.

My question got a few boos from the resident reds.

His answer as that this wasn’t an act of “self determination” but an attempt to reimpose fascism on Hungary.

The audience back then was smart enough to see through his dialectical bullshit. Point scored for the good guys.

Today, Aptheker would be the head of the Political Science department in most universities (even though he’s been dead for years).

You know the old saying: “Old reds never die; they just smell that way”.


50 posted on 11/08/2013 5:33:09 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

I hope they try to enforce their policy. I truly do.


51 posted on 11/08/2013 5:39:26 PM PST by Slings and Arrows (You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Undocumented Democrats.


52 posted on 11/08/2013 5:46:50 PM PST by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

I like “WETBACK” or “spic.” The former was used in a govt program to relieve America of those turd world savages: “Operation Wetback.” Of course, we don’t much care for real history.


53 posted on 11/08/2013 5:47:10 PM PST by LouAvul (In a state of disbelief as to how liberals destroyed America in a mere 40 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Did they ban the term collaborator too?


54 posted on 11/08/2013 6:06:52 PM PST by DoughtyOne (People will retain the power to control the Government, or it will retain the power to control them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

They should change it to undocumented democrats


55 posted on 11/08/2013 6:15:31 PM PST by saintgermaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
I, too, object to the term "illegal immigrant." They are illegally here, but they are not immigrants. They are "invaders." When they cluster together and replicate the place they came from, they are "colonists." Let's call as spade a spade. And, if necessary, call it a bloody shovel. But let's quit using weasel words.
56 posted on 11/08/2013 7:09:52 PM PST by JoeFromSidney ( book, RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY, available from Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

This is what it looks like when the inmates run the asylum.


57 posted on 11/08/2013 9:14:08 PM PST by Spok ("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
“No human being is illegal,” the resolution continues. “ ‘Foreign nationals,’ ‘undocumented immigrants,’ ‘immigrants without papers’ and ‘immigrants seeking status’ are examples of terms we can use that do not dehumanize people.”

Yet they are probably among those that wanted George Zimmerman prosecuted.

I wonder if they have the brains to realize the implications of "no human being is illegal" and "no act by a human being can be illegal".

If they get their way, we get to clean out the rats nest without worry of prosecution.

58 posted on 11/09/2013 3:22:36 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson