Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Middle Class Is the New Poor
Frontpage Mag ^ | 11/01/2013 | Daniel Greenfield

Posted on 11/11/2013 7:01:13 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Uncertainty and struggle are what we most often associate with poverty. Not knowing if you can still afford to pay next month’s bills and worrying over how much more you can cut back when you’re already barely getting by. This way of life has become more associated with the middle class than with those at the very bottom.

The statistic that shows that average black household worth is at $4,955 while average white household worth is at $110,729 is often quoted, but these numbers are not comparing similar things.

The $110,729 and $4,955 don’t reflect different standards of living; but different ways of living.

The $110,729 and $4,955 families both have large flat screen televisions, smartphones and the usual consumer toys. They could both eat equally well, except that the $4,955 family doesn’t bother watching its food budget. It just takes whatever it wants off the shelf and worries about prices later.

In terms of personal satisfaction, the $4,955 family is happier than the $110,729 family.

To understand this, think of the “Cloud.” You can buy a laptop powerful enough to store all your programs and data. Or you can get by with a mobile device whose apps connect online to a “Cloud” of someone else’s servers which store your data. The laptop is heavier to carry than the mobile device, but makes you more independent. Or you can just live in the “Cloud” confident that no matter how you mess up your device; your data will be backed up.

America is being divided between the workers and the dwellers in the government cloud.

The $110,729 families are independent while the $4,955 families are living in the cloud. Their cloud is “Social Capital.” Instead of using real capital, they use the collective Social Capital of family resources and government aid.

The $110,729 family pays for everything. The $4,955 family pays for very little. The $110,729 family earns and saves money because that is its medium of exchange which it uses to obtain food, shelter and clothing. The $4,955 family uses money for luxury goods like televisions or sneakers. It doesn’t need to save money because cash is just bonus points. Its necessities like food, medicine and shelter are covered by the social capital of the government.

The $110,729 family is isolated while the $4,955 family is part of a social network that extends to the entire government. It’s no wonder that the $4,955 family also has much less worries than the $110,729 family living in the house they don’t own and worrying what will happen to their standard of living if they lose their jobs tomorrow.

The $4,955 family is single parent, but is built around a large extended family, mostly female, and mostly on various government benefits. That family is capable of providing valuable aid, not just in government money, but also by babysitting and helping out at home.

That extended family is one reason why Clan $4,955 has 5 to 8 kids, while the mother of the two-parent $110,729 household is tearing her hair out trying to figure out how to manage two kids and a full-time job.

Since the $110,729 family is actually funding the lifestyle of the $4,955 family, that’s a problem, but it’s a problem that no one talks about. And when social capital gets tight, Medicare for the $110,729 family’s grandpa is more likely to be cut than the endless community grants that help keep the $4,955 family and all their kids comfortable and voting Democrat early and often.

The $110,729 family is responsible. It understands that money is finite and that the government can only do so much. The $4,955 family doesn’t understand that and won’t accept it and has a lot more free time and energy to do something about it. The $110,729 family looks at a variety of factors before voting. The $4,955 family is practical; it looks only at its own bottom line.

No money, no vote.

On paper, the $4,955 family is poor. But in a society where hundreds of billions of dollars go into funding social capital, the old dollar-and-cent household values no longer apply.

On paper, the $110,729 family has an impressive household worth, but much of that worth comes from a mortgaged home that it is struggling to keep up the payments on. The $4,955 family lives in a housing project that they can’t lose no matter how many payments they miss on their high interest credit cards.

There are still plenty of working poor in America, but the broken families that pad out the bottom of that $4,955 statistic rarely work for a living. They work for extras. Social capital has freed them of the need to work for anything except luxuries.

The middle class is trapped by its own aspirations. Though the middle class still has the majority of the vote, it has the least political influence because it has the least disposable time and wealth, and lacks a dedicated political class to represent its interests.

The United States is no longer a middle class country. Politicians have a vested interest in catering to very rich donors or welfare voters because they have the time, money and organizations to get their way. And what they want is more wealth redistribution upward and downward from the middle class.

The middle class is being looted by crony capitalists and welfare clans. The liberal Robin Hoods who direct billions in stolen money to Green Energy companies and ghetto voters do their best to convince the middle class that it should vote for them because it’s actually poor.

The middle class is poor, but it has all the disadvantages of poverty and none of the advantages.

The Obama vision is a “Cloud” America where all the money is in the government cloud and each family is given support according to its needs and is taken for whatever its abilities earn. That vision is already true on the $4,955 scale and is coming true on the $110,729 level as well.

The government money “Cloud” works about as well as Healthcare.gov. Its brand of central planning has failed everywhere it’s been tried. But the experiment won’t completely crash until the middle class does.

Margaret Thatcher famously said that Socialism works until it runs out of other people’s money. The “other people” are the middle class who have the most money and the least ability to protect it from the cloud dwellers.

There are two Americas; the America of the working class and the Obamerica of the government class. Measuring poverty in net worth is relevant in only one of these Americas. To measure poverty across both nations, we must speak of the poverty of freedom, the poverty of marriage, the poverty of economic security and the poverty of leisure time.

These are the true measures of modern poverty in an America where some people are living in a postmodern government cloud that uses social capital instead of personal income and others are scratching out an uncertain living to support the “Cloud Dwellers” who manage the government bureaucracy, work at non-profits and squat in the $4,955 space.

Our postmodern economy punishes personal aspiration and rewards the surrender of economic independence to the government. More Americans are vanishing into the government cloud and dropping out of the system until the cloud becomes too heavy to float in the sky and sinks down to earth or until the New Poor get tired of living fearful lives to subsidize the $4,955.

An American workers’ revolution will not be a Socialist revolution, it will be an Anti-Socialist revolution of the new poor of the middle class.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: middleclass; poor

1 posted on 11/11/2013 7:01:13 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

And when that revolution occurs, I trust that progressives pay dearly with their lives and fortunes.


2 posted on 11/11/2013 7:07:23 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The United States is no longer a middle class country. Politicians have a vested interest in catering to very rich donors or welfare voters because they have the time, money and organizations to get their way. And what they want is more wealth redistribution upward and downward from the middle class.

Hollow out the middle class. The few remaining liberal elites then have their permanent underclass beholden to them thru the ballot box to provide them with a few crumbs. Perfect. That system is pretty much the model of the Roman Empire. That model "works". At least for awhile. Until the barbarians knock over the rotten system.

3 posted on 11/11/2013 7:24:21 AM PST by Flick Lives (The U.S. is dead to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If there is another revolution it will not be started by the conservative middle class. It will begin when the money dries up.

Socialism is a Ponzi scheme. Those in early benefit as there are few drawing benefits while a large number or paying. Eventually the numbers change places, and there are more drawing benefits then are paying. We are close to that point now.

The workers and savings adjust their life so they are not paying as much.

Those receiving the benefits keep wanting more.

Eventually there is no more to give and/or the entire system collapses. Either way the entitled class gets angry and the revolt is on.

Although I don’t wish it to happen, it would be interesting who the “winners” are and who the “losers” are.

Either way, because of the socialist policies of the last 100 year America as we know it will have changed.

Somehow I do not think that socialist will like the world they created.


4 posted on 11/11/2013 7:31:38 AM PST by CIB-173RDABN (I do not doubt that our climate changes. I only doubt that anything man does has any effect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The GOP would do well to stop wringing their hands over the “plight” of the rich and marginal tax rates for a while and start looking at ways to inspire the middle class to produce more.

As a factory worker it didn’t take me long to figure out that there was an overtime tipping point where I actually made less per hour due to being bumped into a higher bracket. Stop punishing the employee for producing more and reward him instead.

If you want to help the rich and the middle class, eliminate the idiotic tax on manufacturing so factories will hire more who produce more.


5 posted on 11/11/2013 7:34:45 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Greenfield smacks it out of the park once again. Right on the mark.


6 posted on 11/11/2013 7:43:29 AM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

I can tell ya this...the 2% hike in SS tax on my income and 2% hike on my spouse’s income sure was noticeable.

Rising health, homeowners, auto insurance rates.
Pay increases at work have stagnated.
Food prices up, gasoline up (until recently) and utility rates are up.

Yea.....I’ve notice a change and it ain’t for the better.


7 posted on 11/11/2013 7:43:51 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

*


8 posted on 11/11/2013 7:47:43 AM PST by Excellence (All your database are belong to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A friend of mine who homeschooled her children said that one advantage was that, if you want to go protest something, like a law that impacts homeschoolers, or a cause you believe in, like pro-life, you have the flexible schedule to do that.

Wonder if that is one reason why some would like to shut down the homeschoolers.


9 posted on 11/11/2013 7:49:28 AM PST by married21 ( As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives
That system is pretty much the model of the Roman Empire. That model "works". At least for awhile.

Its major drawback, even from a ruler's point of view, is that it doesn't correlate to a productive economy. So the ruling class, one or two or ten generations hence, will find themselves the king rats at the top of a garbage heap.

10 posted on 11/11/2013 7:52:01 AM PST by Oberon (John 12:5-6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

Won’t work here. The barbarians are already inside the gates.


11 posted on 11/11/2013 8:49:30 AM PST by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
How much is free time worth?

Working people have much less of it than those on assistance.

They lose part of their life to work while others get to enjoy theirs for free.

12 posted on 11/11/2013 8:52:30 AM PST by freerepublicchat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

In Stockman’s book he calculates that the number of USA “breadwinner” jobs peaked in 1998.

After that the growth is more people on the bottom and more $$ on the top.


13 posted on 11/11/2013 8:57:50 AM PST by nascarnation (Baraq's 3rd term: squaw Warren? Lord help us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Greenfield needs a bigger audience.


14 posted on 11/11/2013 9:03:37 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“The GOP would do well to stop wringing their hands over the “plight” of the rich and marginal tax rates for a while and start looking at ways to inspire the middle class to produce more.”

The problem is that all of these programs to soak the rich strike mainly at the middle class and working poor. Instead of having the opportunity to invest their money by hiring people, the payoff for doing so is reduced or eliminated...so they are convinced to not. Government jobs generally cost more than twice their number in lost non-government jobs.


15 posted on 11/11/2013 9:31:55 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777
Yea.....I’ve notice a change and it ain’t for the better.

It's mourning in America!

16 posted on 11/11/2013 9:55:04 AM PST by Flick Lives (The U.S. is dead to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lepton

Their whining will mean something when they have to wonder how they will pay their light bill or feed themselves.

Most are nothing but corporate welfare bums anyway. They could use their influence to crush the EPA or seek tax breaks for all but instead they use their influence to target the competition, suck up subsidies and now attack the tea party. They love socialism so let them wallow in it.


17 posted on 11/11/2013 10:04:08 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Now you understand liberalism. It’s a two-class scam.


18 posted on 11/11/2013 10:08:09 AM PST by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“They”?

What monolith is this “they”?


19 posted on 11/11/2013 1:17:13 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

“In Stockman’s book he calculates that the number of USA “breadwinner” jobs peaked in 1998.”
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

I would hazard a guess that that year may be late, I don’t think there is any chance that it is early. I can say for certain because I lived through it that there was a time when a young man could finish high school, go to work immediately, put his heart into his work and be an established family man with a wife, a couple of children and a house with a mortgage by the age when young people of today are at the very best finishing college with an undergraduate degree and a big student loan debt and prospects for employment MUCH WORSE than the eighteen year old just out of high school used to have. Many, if not most, who do find employment are taking the kind of job that once would have gone to a PUBLIC high school DROPOUT, not even a public high school graduate.

This situation did not come about by accident either. This country has been conquered by foreign invaders, they just didn’t use the kind of weapons people usually think of foreign invaders using.


20 posted on 11/11/2013 5:28:30 PM PST by RipSawyer (The TREE currently falling on you actually IS worse than a Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson