Skip to comments.Tear Down this What? The Common Core on the End of the Cold War
Posted on 11/11/2013 10:24:49 AM PST by Kaslin
The ninth of November marked the twenty-fourth anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, probably the most important historical event since World War II and the most important lesson about human freedom experienced within the living memory of most of us. Presumably, next year there will be more of a commemoration, but the salient question now is how this lesson is being taught in the nations classrooms. For while those of us in our forties and older remember the fall of communism and its causes, todays teenagers are wholly in the dark. What, then, are the high-school students of today being taught about what exactlywhat principles, what forces, which peoplebrought down the Wall?
It is actually fairly easy to answer this question since forty-five states are now controlled by the testing and curricular regime known as the Common Core. The Common Core documents themselves, admittedly, are sometimes what Churchill called the Soviet Union, a riddle wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. If we just take a quick glance at Appendix B of the Common Core English Standards, which recommends exemplar texts for reading, we find the addresses of a host of worthy historical figures: Patrick Henry, George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Franklin Roosevelt, Martin Luther King, and, yes, Ronald Reagan. What a model of non-partisan selection!
But it would behoove us to look at which speech of Reagan is being recommended: Address to Students at Moscow State University. Now that is rather odd. Would that speech be the first that comes to mind when we consider the best of Reagan? Was that address the most historically significant? Why not the First Inaugural or his acceptance speech at the 1980 Convention or his important addresses on foreign policy or even his 1964 A Time for Choosing on behalf of Barry Goldwater that launched him to political prominence? Might this be a case of the architects of the Common Core wanting to look non-partisan by having Reagans name on the list while actually trying to take away the force of his message to America? We can solve the mystery by finding out what will take place in classes across the land, neatly packaged for us in a textbook that bears the Common Core logo: two Cs inside a bright red ball.
On pages 403-4 of Pearson/Prentice Halls LITERATURE, Grade Ten, Common Core Edition, we see an editorial written on the tenth anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall. It appeared in The New York Times. It begins, The Berlin Wall was bound to fall eventually. Thats interesting. Was the editorial board of The New York Times writing in 1980 that the Berlin Wall was bound to fall eventually? The editorial continues:
But that it came down as bloodlessly as it did 10 years ago this week is largely a tribute to one leader. Today Mikhail Gorbachev is a political pariah in Russia and increasingly forgotten in the West. But history will remember him generously for his crucial role in ending the cold war and pulling back the Iron Curtain that Stalin drew across Europe in 1945. [Emphasis added.]
So there you have it. Gorbachev brought down the Wall. Why? Well, evidently because he was a good guy. In one line of the editorial we are treated to a masterful use of elliptical prose: As political pressures began to build in the late 1980s, Mr. Gorbachev was left with two options. Etc. What political pressures? Who or what brought those pressures? We are not told. The New York Times editors assign the words enlightened, idealism, and pragmatic to Gorbachev. Indeed, the General Secretary of the Communist Party is said to have had a wisdom and decency that is sadly rare in international power politics. Does that comment extend to American participants in international power politics, particularly at that time?
Those of us who lived through those years and kept up with events might wonder what role, if any, Ronald Reagan played in this drama, according to the textbook editors. Will the adjectives enlightened, pragmatic, wise, and decent be applied to him? His name is not to be found in any of the documents concerning the fall of the Berlin Wall. But on page 449, we do find, as promised in the Common Core, his Address to the Students of Moscow State University held up as a model exemplar text. Unfortunately, the address is so heavily highlighted with shades of green, blue, orange, gray, purple, and pinkand so buried under the jargon of two-bit literary criticism (central idea and point of view, methods of development, organizational structures, rhetorical devices, figurative language, tone and word choice)that it is hardly readable. Worse still, in the textbook editors introduction to the speech, students are told the following:
Led by Mikhail Gorbachev, the Soviets were blazing through the greatest changes they had seen since the 1917 revolution. Although reforms were rapidly taking root, they were not far enough from communist ideology for Reagan. . . . In this excerpt, notice how Reagan restrains his strongly anti-communist sentiments while still extolling the ideals he represents.
The lesson? The enlightened, idealistic, wise, decent, and yet pragmatic Gorbachev had events well under control. The Soviets were blazing through changes; i.e. reform must have been their idea. But things were not moving fast enough for the strongly-anti-communist (i.e. stubborn, right-wing) Reagan. Nonetheless, we, the editors, have found a rare speech in which he actually moderated his tone. Thats Reagan at his best, insofar as he had a best.
Whats missing in this account? General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization: Come here to this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall! Those are the words that brought down the Wall. But they are not to be found in the Common Core and therefore in the classrooms of America.
The architects of the Common Core plainly do not want the young people of America to read or to watchfor it is on the Webthat speech. The progressive bureaucrats who are now in control of the nations schools do not want the young people of America to know that the Cold War was won on principle, that courage and resolution on the part of Americans were essential to the ending of tyranny in the communist-controlled countries and the protecting of freedom in the rest of the world. They certainly do not want young Americans thinking that we were in the right and had to be prepared to use force against an evil empire. Above all, the arch-testers do not want todays youth and tomorrows voters to know that in this contest for right and freedom a former actor named Ronald Reagan played the starring role.
The old Soviet Union fell, only to usher in a Communist takeover of the United States. Won’t be long until Russia becomes a more desirable place to live than the U.S.S.A.
Two of my grandchildren are attending public school in SoCal. I took them to the Reagan library a couple of years ago; looks I should take them a few more times.
The winner gets to write history and the conservatives didn’t win in the US.
Such a shame.
Russian ending Cold War is like saying extremist Islam is liberating women.
Do what Caligula told Tiberius: "First we make a list. A long, lonngg list!"