Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

One World Trade Center declared the tallest building in the US at 1,776 feet ....
The Daily Mail Online ^ | November 13, 2013 | Daily Mail Reporter

Posted on 11/13/2013 10:08:16 AM PST by Uncle Chip

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: who_would_fardels_bear
What about those native huts in the highlands of Peru? Or the tents at base camp near Mt. Everest?

Normally I would say no to huts, but since we now have America's first mud-hut president, huts probably do count. Definite no on tents.

21 posted on 11/13/2013 11:02:52 AM PST by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dixie Yooper

Then any cabin in Leadville Colorado is about four times higher.


22 posted on 11/13/2013 12:09:41 PM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dixie Yooper

That can’t possibly be even close to true. It cannot even be the tallest building in the US by that measure. The Willis Tower is under 1,730 ft tall to the top of the roof antenna, and officially 1,451 ft. The highest point in Chicago is 672 ft. above sea level. Thus, even if we go by the top of the antenna and assume that the Willis Tower is located at the highest point in Chicago, the top of the building is 2,402 ft. above sea level.

The lowest point in Denver, CO has an elevation of 5,130 ft. above sea level. Therefore, ANY building located in Denver must be higher above sea level than the Willis Tower, and it’s not really even close. A 1 story house in Denver, must have a roof at least 5,140 ft. above sea level, or 2,738 ft. higher than the top of the antenna on Willis Tower, more than double the elevation of the WT antenna.


23 posted on 11/13/2013 12:09:55 PM PST by stremba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: duckworth
does anyone else get a creepy feeling that it’s called “One World Trade Center?”

"One" in the name represents only a numerical designation for the building, as there are other WTC buildings as well. I don't get the creepiness you feel.

24 posted on 11/13/2013 12:26:56 PM PST by Lou L (Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lou L

I don’t really think it’s creepy, but it is likely that the numerical designations of the surviving WTC buildings will not be changed. Therefore, there will be a 1 WTC, and a 3 WTC, but no 2 WTC. Not necessarily creepy, but it is a reminder of what happened there on 9-11.


25 posted on 11/13/2013 12:44:37 PM PST by stremba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lou L

BTW,

You seem to know more about the WTC than I do. There was another building besides 1 WTC and 2 WTC (the twin towers) which did not survive the attacks on 9/11. Which one was that?


26 posted on 11/13/2013 12:46:18 PM PST by stremba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: stremba
I really don't claim to know that much about the WTC. I had the pleasure to drive by the new Freedom Tower earlier this year, and that's about it, other than what I've read.

I seem to recall there was another WTC building that maybe had structural damage, and either came down, or was torn down. Perhaps a Bing search would reveal the answer?

27 posted on 11/13/2013 1:08:07 PM PST by Lou L (Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

I think it is interesting that this article did not include the ‘intelligent’ and ‘insightful’ comments made yesterday on this subject by the ‘honorable’ mayor of Chicago, Mr. Ramadan Emmanuel...


28 posted on 11/13/2013 1:32:57 PM PST by WayneS (No problem is so great that it cannot be made worse by a "progressive" solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stremba

WTC 7 was the 46 story building destroyed on the site in the 9/11 attack. It burned for hours, then collapsed. I’m pretty sure nobody died in that building, as it was not hit directly and they had plenty of time to evacuate.


29 posted on 11/13/2013 1:43:00 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; PhilCollins; GOPsterinMA

As far as I’m concerned the SEARS Tower is still the tallest building in the country. I will never use the new name nor care about the decoration on top of 1 WTC.

I still say they should have rebuilt the towers to look the same, maybe with a missile battery on top, instead of building that mirrored thing.


30 posted on 11/14/2013 9:00:50 PM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy

“One World” Trade Center

They might have well have called Muhammad & Allah Trade Center


31 posted on 11/14/2013 9:02:54 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Impy
As far as I’m concerned the SEARS Tower is still the tallest building in the country.

That may be so but the One World Trade Center is clearly the tallest Minaret in the world.

32 posted on 11/15/2013 3:37:36 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson