I can certainly understand the upset of being able to deal with a deadly disease and the ramifications of Obama and the Democrat’s THREE YEAR old law designed to conveniently avoid critical voting milestones.
But, as will all deceptions, the truth must out, and I commiserate with those affected. However, this article does not name or describe the ‘victim’ in any specificity other than ‘she lost coverage’. I’d like to know a little bit more about it, myself. They had enough to put her picture in the article, why not a name and a description that fully describes the circumstances?
There is a video, did you see that?
My bad....they did give her name and show her husband - but nothing else.
She is obviously from another country married to an American. The place where they did the interview was strange and very expensive looking - they did not say if this was their home. It looked like a very expensive hotel lobby.