Posted on 11/16/2013 5:12:24 PM PST by NotYourAverageDhimmi
Edited on 11/16/2013 5:25:43 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
Think of it as a reverse form of “political correctness.”
The picture suggests an IQ of about 85 but, of course, we all know how culturally biased those tests are.
In today’s world, liberals set the criteria for talking about race.
In this case, apparently we’re not supposed to notice the inconvenient truth that these players are black, or notice that there is so much violence in the black community.
In the Trayvon Martin case, it was all about race, as liberals charged that race was THE issue in that case. In that case, we were supposed to repeatedly emphasize the race and ethnicity of those involved, because it allegedly signified some larger issue.
That was okay with liberals, but in this case, it is apparently verboten to make the observation that these players are black. Perhaps because it’s a case of black on black violence, which liberals also ignore.
Frankly, on this topic I don’t think can spell at all.
There is something going to in the Black community that allows folks like these to gang up on one person and beat them almost to death, or to death.
Please link us to even one instance where a group of five white men ganged up on a Black guy and beat him to death in the last year. For that matter, link us to a report of a group beating handed down by members of any other race in the last year.
Perhaps it is happening. I’m sure not seeing it.
Think of low intelligence: i.e. inability to foresee the consequences, coupled with low impulse control; i.e. the thought hits his moronic IQ “hit him” and the thought is immediately transformed into action. The two disabilities are largely genetic in origin and are endemic in certain populations.
Excellent point. The race angle is okay when it suits certain people, not so much when it doesn’t.
Whoa . . . wait a minute, cowboy. I understood this crime to be black-on-black. If you want to jumpstart a conversation about black-on-white crime, this might not be the thread.
Black football players get into a fight, therefore Trayvon Martin. Who says conservatives can’t do political correctness?
Who was the first guy on this thread to mention Whites?
You know, sometimes you should just give it some time before you introduce race to a thread. It wasn’t called for here, but you couldn’t wait to make some comment like Whites weren’t blameless either.
Good grief!
I made the same observation on another thread. Say what?
I don’t care what color these guys are, how can you do that to a fellow human being and it not be a felony?
This was a cowardly act.
I agree!
That’s it, dismiss legitimate observations from other FReepers, and denigrate them in the process.
If you can’t own up to what you do, don’t do it.
You know what, the thread stands. If you can’t see what you see because of your own bias, it’s not my problem.
Your post doesn’t even make sense.
The first comment regarding race was comment #8. By no coincidence, it was the first comment to which I responded.
So when Obama said Trayvon Martin looked like his son, it wasn’t racist, but when our people say a person looks like his son, it’s racist?
You’re kidding right? Nobody can be this stupid, unless their last name is Jackson or Sharpton, and they look like Obama’s son.
Too simple for you to understand, I suppose.
That is definitely true, although I ain't taking sides in your little "game"
My “game,” huh? LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.