Skip to comments.Seven States Sue EPA To Crack Down on Residential Wood Burning
Posted on 11/17/2013 9:09:47 AM PST by rktman
A lawsuit filed against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by seven states is seeking to force the federal agency to impose stringent new regulations on residential wood-burning heaters, which they claim can increase particle pollution to levels that cause significant health concerns. (See EPA wood-burning lawsuit.pdf)
The lawsuit, filed last month in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by the attorneys general of Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Vermont, is directed against currently unregulated indoor and outdoor wood boilers, which have become an increasingly popular way to heat homes, particularly in rural areas.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
Only you can prevent forest fires.
health concerns.. haaa.
better to freeze to death, I reckun.. and how many times can ya shovel the snow off of solar panels.. or do they self clean?
How can this be?
Firewood is an American renewable biomass fuel.
All the things the treehuggers want for energy.
the epa is responsible for those fires too. this agency is insane with power
This is all about lost tax revenue. If you’re not buying electricity, or fuel from commercial sources the states are losing taxes. Sick, but par for the course in lib land.
The Bill of Rights at least nominally protects you from abuses by the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government.
There is no Bill of Rights to protect you from the regulators. There is no limitation on their powers. The other three branches of government have delegated power to them for precisely that reason.
Where in the Constitution is congress authorized to delegate its law making/changing authority to an unelected govt entity. It’s illegal but common.
And these states wonder why they keep losing residents in droves. I guess people will have to bundle up like Ralphie’s brother in “Christmas Story.’
i’m in NY...i’m having my fireplace flue cleaned tomorrow...i think this year we will have more fires than usual...
I just mentioned to a buddy of mine yesterday that the one thing I miss most about fall in Michigan is the smell of burning leaves......
Nazi’s being Nazi’s...
Peoples Republic of Austin Texas signed a deal to buy electricity from a Wood Burning Generator in East Texas.
Paid 5X the going rate for electric futures.
I was trying to buy some old railroad ties, was told they were all sold to the generators.
“but, but, we are doing it for our children...”
All blue states. Freeze to death you stupid bastards. Serve you right.
Let’s just ban fire and be done with it.
Rush covered this tactic, a group sues a govt agency just to give the agency cover to do what it wants to do. Now it can say we had to do this to end the law suit.
Do what people do here in eastern Oregon, build a big ass bonfire of scrub and brush, and dare the EPA to show up and put it out.
The EPA has caused more problems than they have solved, and they need to just go away, as in being defunded and eliminated.
Burning wood for heat has been going on since the beginning of time, and it’s no different than burning fuel oil or natural gas. The only difference is that the gas and oil players want the feds to guarantee and enforce their monopoly.
I will burn whatever I reasonably need to keep warm and cook my food, and if the feds don’t like it, tough shit!
Just put a catalytic converter on it. Then you can run your fireplace any time of year even when there are burn bans when a high pressure system is parked over you.
Up`n here in the mountains we dun got them Hickory wooden bullets so we don` pollute them Cuomounista revenooers `n Commie EPA guys.
They'd be much better off with heavily regulated solar power provided by some crony capitalist and a subsidy from the government they can think about keeping when going to the polls.
Well, you gotta admit they did wonders in the Klamath Basin. NOT! Go Bucket Brigade!
Well, they could build themselves a gasifier, continue to burn wood and make no smoke.
You can build it to utilize many different solid fuels, the gas it produces burns as a blue flame, or can run an engine.
Railroad ties are treated lumber, right?
Sue them for releasing toxins into the air, LOL
When I think of a rural area, I think of homes about 100 yards apart. Some may be a mile apart.
I’m sure there’s a real danger of those people being harmed by the neighbor’s wood fire. /s
Some leaders deserve to face the people they make laws for, with their backs to a wall when those people have a stone in their hand.
Better for people to freeze to death.
Good thing we lost our woodburner in that bad boating accident.
I think the epa is getting ready to send all the forests a memorandum of understanding that they should cease and desist from any and all fires henceforth. That ought to do it. /s
Those states are not known for balmy winters-they want everyone to freeze?
Well, with the rate of climb in temperatures they’re experiencing, they should be fairly warm within a year or two.
Thank goodness for glo-bull warming. I guess we’re fundamentally transforming the weather.
***I was trying to buy some old railroad ties, was told they were all sold to the generators.***
Creosote in those railroad ties burn real well! Makes a fire last a long time.
That was certainly the idea, and the Anti-Federalists almost defeated ratification of a constitution without one.
OTOH, James Madison knew bills of rights had proved to be mere parchment barriers that often went by the wayside. He determined the best way to secure republican freedom was through separation of powers. First and foremost was vertical separation, meaning a senate of the states.
Better for EPA lickspittles freeze to death (there, I fixed it).
These are not fireplaces or wood-burning stoves that are inside the house.
They are outdoor wood-fired boilers that make hot water which is piped to the house for heat.
They make SMOKE lots and lots of it. And it doesn't rise the way smoke usually does, the interior of the boiler is cool so the smoke is cool. The combustion is inefficient because of this. Because water is piped to the house, they can be installed far away from the house, say on the property line. The neighbors get enough smoke to make their houses unlivable, but the boiler owner gets the heat and not the smoke.
I don't know about you, but when my neighbor installs something that gives him heat and me unlivable smoke, I don't like it. He destroys much of my property value to save less that $1k per year on heating costs.
My question is,
does the problem between two neighbors that you describe
require a federal bureaucracy to intervene?
Actually, if you start with some money and work, a little or a lot, it makes a lot of sense to have what is called an oven-stove or tile stove. They are a heck of a lot more efficient than air convection stoves for heat, and the fuel is burned a lot more thoroughly, so produces very little smoke. Unless, of course, you *like* to chop wood.
(lots of pretty pictures of oven stoves and tile stoves.)
I agree. BTW, the tactic is called ‘sue and settle’.
Most of the warming alarmists have forgotten-or choose to ignore-that Greenland was actually green in the 9th-10th century, some of the Vikings went there to live, and left when it got cold again. Wine was once produced in England, from grapes grown there, too. Humans can’t control the weather or climate-the lunatics just can’t stand that some of us are smart enough to provide cheaper heat for ourselves, and insist on being left alone to do it.
It is a little colder here every winter, and a nice pile of wood for my fireplace and wood stove beats the price of furnace heat any day...
Great, you just gave the EPA their next idea.
They will want to raise our taxes to pay for it.
This is about DESTROYING SELF SUFFICIENCY!!!
They can’t CONTROL YOU IF YOU’RE SELF SUFFICIENT.
If you’re not DEPENDENT ON UTILITIES CONTROLLED BY THE GOV’T, their power is diminished.
Well, I know I for one will be more than happy to send them more money. If you got anything left over, you ain’t paying enough. LOL!
Snow covered self cleaning solar panels?
Attorneys general of Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Vermont, are showing extreme political cowardice. If they don’t like them ban them in your own state. Don’t look to the feds to provide political cover for you.
oh no your going to get a lecture from another Freeper on that statement.
We have a planet to save! Don't bother with the details? /s
Oh, wow-who is that? I’ve been in lots of pleasant and informative discussions here with other Freepers on everything from the last Ice Age to the Medieval Warming period to the present climate-I apparently missed any disagreements, and enjoyed the conversations.
BTW-I agree 100% with your tagline...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.