Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas drivers get asked for saliva, blood at police roadblock
NBC ^

Posted on 11/20/2013 5:58:03 AM PST by Red in Blue PA

Some drivers along a busy Fort Worth street on Friday were stopped at police roadblock and directed into a parking lot, where they were asked by federal contractors for samples of their breath, saliva and even blood. It was part of a government research study aimed at determining the number of drunken or drug-impaired drivers. "It just doesn't seem right that you can be forced off the road when you're not doing anything wrong," said Kim Cope, who said she was on her lunch break when she was forced to pull over at the roadblock on Beach Street in North Fort Worth.

(Excerpt) Read more at usnews.nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dnadatabase; donutwatch; drill; dryrun; neoprohibition; orwelliannightmare; papersplease; policestate; test; texas; ussa; warriorcop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: Red in Blue PA

Liberal elite totalitarian thugs doing dry run research....


21 posted on 11/20/2013 6:18:31 AM PST by GOPJ (Was Obama giving nucluear information and equipment to Iran - through Benghazi?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

They’re checking how far citizens can be pushed....


22 posted on 11/20/2013 6:19:19 AM PST by GOPJ (Was Obama giving nucluear information and equipment to Iran - through Benghazi?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

Areas near Dallas are dry counties. You can bring it in and consume it but they still have the vestiges of prohibition.

They had a task force out busting people of “Public Intoxication” if they were observed drinking more than 2 beverages in an hour (no breath test or carnival games necessary to convict). $500 fine, thousands were written.

They’d bust people in the hotel bar of the hotel they were staying at.

Not rowdy people. But they were “drinking” beyond the arbitrary “legal limit”.

Good for financing.


23 posted on 11/20/2013 6:21:56 AM PST by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Damn....

4th Amendment? Unreasonable search and seizure? WTF?


24 posted on 11/20/2013 6:22:47 AM PST by ScottinVA (Obama is so far in over his head, even his ears are beneath the water level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

I would have refused, and then sued afterwards if my license was taken away. You’re correct. DNA data base and massive invasion of privacy. The test they ostensibly were looking at was for alcohol - you don’t need saliva and blood for that.


25 posted on 11/20/2013 6:24:50 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

If you do it at the point of a gun, you are part of the tyranny.


26 posted on 11/20/2013 6:25:32 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

The USSC ruled cops can take a DNA sample IF you’re suspected of a serious crime, but not otherwise.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/04/us/supreme-court-says-police-can-take-dna-samples.html


27 posted on 11/20/2013 6:26:29 AM PST by ScottinVA (Obama is so far in over his head, even his ears are beneath the water level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

And wink and sing some Bette Midler.


28 posted on 11/20/2013 6:40:09 AM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
The deeper problem--IMO

American do not know their Constitutional rights and how to assert them in the moment of decision.

All of these drivers merely "complied", failing to assert and refuse; And so surrendered their rights...

Pitiful/sad...
...again... JMO

29 posted on 11/20/2013 6:42:20 AM PST by Wings-n-Wind (The main things are the plain things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

This is a violation of the 4th Amendment, IMHO.

I always carry a copy of the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, my DL and CCW, and the Bible, just in case.


30 posted on 11/20/2013 6:45:40 AM PST by left that other site (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor
"the company contracted to perform this research"

After I read this article yesterday I looked the company up on the internet. They have been doing this type of work for the govt a long time. Some of it is eye opening.

For example, on drinking/driving limits you normally say that MADD was driving the lowering of limits, but this company was heavily involved with that.

31 posted on 11/20/2013 6:46:44 AM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

I happened to see this link on the TX message board and wanted to reply. Posted late yesterday with over 100 replies, but cross linking for others to see.


Texas drivers pulled over at random, told to turn over blood, saliva samples
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3093343/posts


32 posted on 11/20/2013 6:49:43 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (The Second Amendment is NOT about the right to hunt. It IS a right to shoot tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

The Supreme Court ruling on DNA samples concerned a lawsuit that was brought regarding a case in Maryland.

Legal experts, at least some of them, said the Supreme Court ruling was specific to that Maryland case.

If more widespread DNA samples are taken from “suspects” beyond the parameters of the Maryland case, these same legal experts believe the Supreme Court will have to re-visit the issue of DNA samples.

Personally, I was appalled at that Supreme Court ruling. DNA samples should only be taken from criminals who are convicted of certain felonies, such as murder, attempted murder, child kidnapping, rape, etc.


33 posted on 11/20/2013 6:49:53 AM PST by july4thfreedomfoundation (The Second Amendment makes all the other amendments possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

So what happens if you just say: “No, I don’t want to participate, and I’m in a hurry”?


34 posted on 11/20/2013 6:53:53 AM PST by Savage Beast ("We don't need this BLOATED FEDERAL GOVERNMENT!! They NEED US!!!!!" ~bandleader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
Areas near Dallas are dry counties

You're partially correct .....


35 posted on 11/20/2013 6:59:34 AM PST by al_c (Obama's standing in the world has fallen so much that Kenya now claims he was born in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor

This is ultimately being funded by the Tides Foundation.

John F’in Kerry’s wife’s entity.


36 posted on 11/20/2013 7:01:21 AM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

I’m on my way to work and if I am late again I get canned. I am stopped by flashing lights and told that I must pull over into a parking lot to give the government sample crew a sample of my spit. Now that just doesn’t seem right, does it?


37 posted on 11/20/2013 7:04:50 AM PST by Rock N Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes

Also George Soros.

I wish someone would file a class action lawsuit against George Soros. He is the one who is destroying our country. President Obamacare is just a sock puppet.


38 posted on 11/20/2013 7:10:55 AM PST by nanetteclaret (Unreconstructed "Elderly Kooky Type" Catholic Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: al_c

There is a dry neighborhood in Houston (the Heights) which I don’t understand because it isn’t even a separate city (such as West University or Bellaire or Jersey Village, etc.). Walgreen’s and Kroger cannot sell beer or wine. Restaurants cannot sell beer or wine. Only is the law for a half dozen blocks in any direction but they are large blocks.


39 posted on 11/20/2013 7:11:21 AM PST by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
It's pretty common to lie to research subjects about the actual point of the study. Apparently this is done so they can get a pure test. I think it's pretty obvious that this has nothing to do with impaired driving.

Go to a ‘bastion’ of ‘freedom’ and violate the hell out of it and see what the public outcry is. The real point of the research is to see if it's time to some more freedoms away from Americans, or if they need to wait a few year more years.

40 posted on 11/20/2013 7:12:58 AM PST by tfecw (It's for the children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson