Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What did Kennedy do for the history of this country?(Canada)
nationalnewswatch.com ^ | Nov 20, 2013 | CP staff

Posted on 11/20/2013 6:46:51 AM PST by headsonpikes

WASHINGTON - John F. Kennedy's personal pollster came to Canada with an assumed name, the blessing of the president and a secret objective: help defeat the Diefenbaker Tories.

Canadians might be surprised by the extent to which political events in this country were shaped by the charismatic U.S. leader, famously assassinated 50 years ago this week.

Helping to elect the Pearson Liberals, for starters, who would go on to introduce a new national flag, expand the welfare state and create medicare, the old-age pension system, and the royal commission on bilingualism.

The Liberals got tactical support, with state-of-the-art polling. Diplomatic rockets rained down on their opponents. And in the heat of an election campaign, the opposition leader was invited to the White House as an honoured guest.

The perceived interference became so acute that a fuming John Diefenbaker eventually took the extraordinary step of recalling Canada's ambassador to the U.S.

That diplomatic riposte failed to stop the Diefenbaker Conservatives from disintegrating, through internal divisions and a non-confidence motion that focused specifically on relations with the U.S.

Did Kennedy play a determining role?

"I think he played a very major role in Canadian history," John English, Pearson's biographer and a one-time Liberal MP, said in an interview.

"He definitely influenced Canadian history through the 1962-63 election period. There's no doubt that his animosity to Diefenbaker made his position very difficult not only with the broader public, but within his own party."

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalnewswatch.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: canada; diefenbaker; kennedy; pearson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-79 next last
This is a good overview of the politics of the time.
1 posted on 11/20/2013 6:46:51 AM PST by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

ping


2 posted on 11/20/2013 6:48:33 AM PST by headsonpikes (Mass murder and cannibalism are the twin sacraments of socialism - "Who-whom?"-Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes

The world would be a much better place had Old Man Joseph K. been sterile


3 posted on 11/20/2013 6:56:42 AM PST by A_Former_Democrat ("I was all for Obamacare until I found out I was paying for it,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes

The world would be a much better place had Old Man Joseph K. been sterile


4 posted on 11/20/2013 6:56:42 AM PST by A_Former_Democrat ("I was all for Obamacare until I found out I was paying for it,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes

Kennedy was assassinated, that’s about it.


5 posted on 11/20/2013 6:59:05 AM PST by svcw (Not 'hope and change' but 'dopes in chains')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes

lets see now could itbe screwed Monroe..along with the rest of the brothers


6 posted on 11/20/2013 7:01:30 AM PST by PLD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive; exg; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; Cannoneer No. 4; ...
To all- please ping me to Canadian topics.

Canada Ping!

7 posted on 11/20/2013 7:01:31 AM PST by Squawk 8888 (I'd give up chocolate but I'm no quitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes

So JFK played a major role in turning Canada left.


8 posted on 11/20/2013 7:01:50 AM PST by Fiji Hill (Io Triumphe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

...or if he and his wife had been into abortion.


9 posted on 11/20/2013 7:02:58 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: svcw

“Kennedy was assassinated, that’s about it.”

You’re right-—the “Died Young Syndrome”.

Instant sanctification.

.


10 posted on 11/20/2013 7:03:01 AM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
I don't think Pearson or Diefenbaker were good for Canada. I didn't like either one. That said, I don't appreciate US involvement in domestic Canadian politics.

Ironically, the best PM of that time would have been an American capitalist who sat in the commons as a liberal, C.D. Howe.

11 posted on 11/20/2013 7:03:38 AM PST by Former Proud Canadian (Cruz/Palin 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
JFK lowered taxes and gave a great inaugural Speech.

I can not imagine a Democrat uttering those words today.

President Kennedy's inaugural address in Washington D.C. In his speech President Kennedy urges American citizens to participate in public service and "ask not what your country can do for you- ask what you can do for your country." Democrats today will ever utter those words today nor vote to reduce taxes

The only part they accept that is he was weak at foreign policy.

12 posted on 11/20/2013 7:05:04 AM PST by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes

If Kennedy hadn’t run like a rabbit at the Bay of Pigs Khrushchev never would have found the courage to move missiles into Cuba. Kennedy’s supposed finest hour, the Cuban Missile Crusis was a self-imposed near disaster. It was a product of his cowardice.


13 posted on 11/20/2013 7:05:15 AM PST by muir_redwoods (Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
I remember.

He demonstrated the value TV would be for politics. He was telegenic.. that is the lone reason that made him a "great" president.

14 posted on 11/20/2013 7:06:35 AM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
So much for the fantasy that JFK was a closet conservative.
15 posted on 11/20/2013 7:09:23 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Who knew that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional journalism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

C.D. Howe, eh? That d*mned Liberal!

My old man would have chased you around the yard!

Cheers!

In the aftermath of the Dief debacle and Liberal triumph, I was a Davie Fulton supporter, which I acknowledge to have been a futile gesture.


16 posted on 11/20/2013 7:11:15 AM PST by headsonpikes (Mass murder and cannibalism are the twin sacraments of socialism - "Who-whom?"-Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All

I think conservatives let the Left off easy on JFK.

” Lower rates of taxation will stimulate economic activity to yield and INCREASED... flow of revenues to the federal government “

...JOHN F. KENNEDY...(what Democrats used to be)

We should hammer them on the fact that the Leftists have taken over their Party.

Hell Kennedy was to the right of Reagan and Bush on foreign policy. He actually supported fighting for freedom everywhere and sent 15,000 advisers and Special Forces he invented just for Vietnam, to fight for freedom in Vietnam.

Think about it.

He was George W Bush before Bush an without a 9-11 to provoke him.


17 posted on 11/20/2013 7:13:43 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Ted Cruz...2016-24 ...A New Conservative Era)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

The speech may have had some catchy lines but it was not a great speech. Kennedy stated that we held the power to end poverty for mankind. Christ said the poor are with you always but here was JFK saying that with innovative progressive initiatives (proper liberal programs, foreign aid, the UN) poverty would be a thing of the past worldwide.


18 posted on 11/20/2013 7:19:48 AM PST by Monterrosa-24 (...even more American than a French bikini and a Russian AK-47.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
Liberal meant something else then. C.D. helped win the war and was partially responsible for the growth of manufacturing in Canada.

Dief killed the Arrow, Howe would have built it. What kind of a nation would we be now if we had built the Arrow?

19 posted on 11/20/2013 7:22:38 AM PST by Former Proud Canadian (Cruz/Palin 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PLD

“.. it be screwed Monroe.. along witht he rest of the brothers”.

He screwed Monroe’s brothers?!! /s


20 posted on 11/20/2013 7:32:09 AM PST by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: scooby321
He was not a Keynesian.

This was his high point.

He had great speech writers.

He was great at rhetorical delivery.

Never did understand what a
Jelly Doughnut is called in Berlin.

Passed woman around as if they
were pieces of meat.

Had an affair with a Nazi spy in Washington DC

Sent to war in the Pacific.

Abysmal sailor, turned off his engines
in enemy waters.

Allowed his ship to be destroyed by an enemy cruiser.

Other than the first item listed
he was a run of the mill Kennedy.


21 posted on 11/20/2013 7:32:34 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your teaching is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

“...sent 15,000 advisers and Special Forces he invented just for Vietnam...”

And this concept of Special Forces should have been used to train and assist the host government forces while on the strategic level conventional forces cut off and punished the aggressor nation. So eventually we had conventional forces in Vietnam playing a counter-insurgency game while the NVA were able to march down unopposed.

A well-engineered menacing and conventional (Maginot) Line along the 17th parallel all the way through Laos and into Thailand is what was needed. Not just a static defense but also a launch area for operations oriented toward the north when the NVA created mischief. The counter-insurgency part would have been successful.

Kennedy does not deserve the blame for putting half a million men in a counter-insurgency roles while the NVA invasion was allowed to continue unchecked. That was all LBJ and the “best and brightest” JFKers he retained.


22 posted on 11/20/2013 7:38:39 AM PST by Monterrosa-24 (...even more American than a French bikini and a Russian AK-47.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: UriÂ’el-2012
"he was a run of the mill Kennedy."

Kennedys' got their $$ from bootleg whiskey.
The bible says you will reap what you sow.
I think they reaped a lot of bad luck.
They are Yankee rednecks with money; ill gotten money.

23 posted on 11/20/2013 7:44:37 AM PST by DeaconRed (RL Burnside sings a song about the Zero Administration. "Everything is Broken")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
Kennedy made one of the most, if not the single most disastrous American foreign policy decisions ever made by an American President.

Specifically, in 1963, Kennedy gave the green light for the assassination of Ngo Dinh Diem, who was the President of South Vietnam. As a result of Diem's assassination, Prince Norodom Sihanouk, who was the leader of Cambodia, declared Cambodia to be a neutral party in the war between North and South Vietnam. At the same time, Sihanouk kicked American military advisers out of Cambodia. Sihanouk took these actions because he believed that if Kennedy was willing to have an ally like Diem assassinated, he might very well do the same thing to Sihanouk.

As a result of Sihanouk's actions, Cambodia became a safe haven for the Viet Cong and the NVA and the Ho Chi Minh trail, thru which the Viet Cong was supplied, was extended for hundreds of miles south along the eastern border of South Vietnam. This made South Vietnam's war with North Vietnam a much tougher fight and ultimately led to the takeover of South Vietnam by Norht Vietnam in 1975.

24 posted on 11/20/2013 7:47:28 AM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

eastern border = western border


25 posted on 11/20/2013 7:54:35 AM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DeaconRed
;-)

26 posted on 11/20/2013 7:55:38 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your teaching is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Monterrosa-24

“Kennedy does not deserve the blame for putting half a million men in a counter-insurgency roles while the NVA invasion was allowed to continue unchecked. That was all LBJ and the “best and brightest” JFKers he retained.”

Absolutely. Johnson was a horse’s azz on domestic and foreign policy.

And my point regarding Kennedy, is not that he was perfect, but he was a supply sider and hardly a shrinking violet on the world stage.....compare that to todays Democrats, who are full fledged Marxists.


27 posted on 11/20/2013 7:59:02 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Ted Cruz...2016-24 ...A New Conservative Era)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes

So JFK undermined the government of John Diefenbaker, a conservative and a strong US ally—just as he undermined the Adenauer government of Germany and Ngo Dinh Diem’s in South Vietnam. For the West, JFK’s legacy was abominable.


28 posted on 11/20/2013 8:01:22 AM PST by Fiji Hill (Io Triumphe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

“Hell Kennedy was to the right of Reagan and Bush on foreign policy.”

ummm, Bay of Pigs .....


29 posted on 11/20/2013 8:02:04 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DeaconRed
They are Yankee rednecks with money; ill gotten money.

In my family circles they were known as "shanty Irish"
pretending to be "lace curtain" Irish.

30 posted on 11/20/2013 8:04:57 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your teaching is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

The whole country on any number of issues was more conservative—and sensible—than the Baby Boomer controlled country, so of course Kennedy, and the Democrats were too.

You can bet though, had he lived....JFK would of become as liberal as his brother Ted became.

Liberalism is a progressive wasting disease....


31 posted on 11/20/2013 8:05:50 AM PST by AnalogReigns (Real life is ANALOG!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

That’s fair.

History shows he pussed out at the last minute.

But, he planned an invasion with US air support originally.

Could you see Reagan or Bush doing this in Cuba or Venezuela or Iran?

Reagan did take action in Grenada, once he knew Cuban military was there and US citizens wee being detained. But nothing on the scope of planning an invasion to free the Cuban people.

Bush Herbert Walker, did invade Panama, but this was due to US military personnel being shot after our man in Panama, Noriega, wouldn’t play ball.

So, yes invasion with US miltary, but provoked by armed assaults on our military in Panama.

Kennedy planned an invasion to rid a communist cancer from our Hemisphere. Now, don’t jump the gun, Reagan won the Cold War. I’m just saying, Kennedy was a Democrat...comparing him to our modern “hate America, espouse Socialism Dems of present day.


32 posted on 11/20/2013 8:11:18 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Ted Cruz...2016-24 ...A New Conservative Era)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
RE: "Hell Kennedy was to the right of Reagan and Bush on foreign policy. He actually supported fighting for freedom everywhere and sent 15,000 advisers and Special Forces he invented just for Vietnam, to fight for freedom in Vietnam."

JFK wasn't quite that noble. He was mostly thinking about himself.

Why JFK picked Viet Nam. I believe it happened this way.

James "Scotty" Reston revealed this in 1966 IIRC.

The hapless Kennedy was savaged by Khrushchev in Vienna in 1961, especially over being chicken at the Bay of Pigs. So badly did JFK represent his Country that he asked for one more chance, a personal meeting with Khrushchev with only the two of them and two interpreters. JFK agreed to meet with Reston first after the meeting. This account is from, "Scotty," by John F. Stacks.

'How was it?' Reston asked casually.

'Worst thing in my life. He savaged me,' Kennedy responded. The president seemed to Reston to be almost in shock, repeating himself and speaking with astonishing candor to the journalist. 'Not the usual bullshit,' Reston wrote in his notepad. 'There is a look a man has when he has to tell the truth.' Kennedy went on to say that to counter the battering by Khrushchev, which he attributed to the Soviet leader's underestimation of Kennedy's resolve, the United States would have to stand more firmly against the Soviets' demands in Berlin and against the mounting Communist insurgency in South Vietnam. Reston wrote later that he was 'speechless' when Kennedy mentioned Vietnam, since that troubled country was at that point nowhere near the heart of the Cold War conflict and, in Reston's estimation, did not carry much weight in the superpower tug-of-war. Ever afterward, Kennedy's remark to Reston was seen by historians and by Reston himself as the moment marking the beginning of America's long slide into the tragedy of Vietnam." [End excerpt]

Yes sir, the JFK people took tens of thousands of Americans into war with the same "resolve" as they had at the Bay of Pigs.

Then LBJ took over caring more about his "Great Society" plans than any thing else including war -- fight the war but it must not in any way hinder getting his "Great Society." Lie, lie, lie whatever it takes. (see McMaster's. "Dereliction of Duty")

Not knowing this in 1961-62 I actually believed that Africa would be the place we'd confront the U.S.S.R.'s wars of liberation.

33 posted on 11/20/2013 8:15:41 AM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

“But, he planned an invasion with US air support originally.”

Wrong. Eisenhower approved the project. Kennedy wimped out.

“Could you see Reagan or Bush doing this in Cuba or Venezuela or Iran?”

I will let Reagan’s and Bush’s record speak for themselves.


34 posted on 11/20/2013 8:18:17 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: momtothree

According to friends of Marilyn, a relationship developed between Marilyn and the two Kennedy brothers. She was believed to have had separate affairs with the two men simultaneously. Her relationships with Robert and John, unknown to the public, became the talk of Hollywood. Marilyn was often seen dancing or in intimate conversation at private parties with Bobby or John. According to her closest friends, her heart belonged to the elder brother, John.

IS THIS BETTER?I think you were the tattle teller at school so it made you look good..Is that so?

http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/notorious_murders/celebrity/marilyn_monroe/6.html


35 posted on 11/20/2013 8:20:50 AM PST by PLD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

“Wrong. Eisenhower approved the project. Kennedy wimped out.”

Ike didn’t pull the trigger. Kennedy did, albeit with trying to do it half assed.


36 posted on 11/20/2013 8:27:49 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Ted Cruz...2016-24 ...A New Conservative Era)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

“Kennedy planned an invasion to rid a communist cancer from our Hemisphere. “

The action was planned by the CIA under Eisenhower. Kennedy was briefed on the mission Nov. 20, 1960.


37 posted on 11/20/2013 8:28:14 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

Me: “Wrong. Eisenhower approved the project. Kennedy wimped out.”

You: Ike didn’t pull the trigger. Kennedy did, albeit with trying to do it half assed.

Ike would have but Kennedy was elected over Nixon. Kennedy pulled our support and doomed the mission.


38 posted on 11/20/2013 8:29:56 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

“Kennedy did, albeit with trying to do it half assed.”

For which Che wrote him a thank you note!


39 posted on 11/20/2013 8:32:06 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
What did Kennedy do for the history of this country?

He got a BJ from Ellen Rometsch.

But then, so did Gerald Ford.

Sex in the Senate

"Ellen Rometsch was … as pretty as Elizabeth Taylor. … She was sort of like me. She’d come from Germany broke. She really loved oral sex. So any time – 90 percent of the people who give you money want to know if you can get them a date. I don’t give a damn who they are. They’re away from mama and their wives and they have a tremendous desire to party. … Bill Thompson [a lobbyist] … said [of Rometsch], ‘Baker, where did you get that good-looking woman? ... You think if I invited her to my apartment she’ll go to the White House and see President Kennedy?’ I said, ‘She would jump at the chance.’ So she went to the White House several times. And President Kennedy called me and said it’s the best head-job he’d ever had, and he thanked me….

Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2013/11/sex-in-the-senate-bobby-baker-99530.html?hp=t2_3

40 posted on 11/20/2013 8:34:27 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael

“JFK wasn’t quite that noble. He was mostly thinking about himself.”

Noble? I’ve seen enough to put that word away when talking about nearly every politician, especially on the conservative side.

Liberals/Socialists...many of them actually fight for their principles and will do anything to win.

No. Kennedy was not the Liberal Socialist view of Camelot. He was the opposite. But he came from a different set of values than our present day Dem/Socialist/Communists.

He saw the Berlin Wall, Vietnam, and Cuba as good vs. evil fights. He knew the coercive nature of Khrushchev’s Soviet Russia. He saw the brute for of it up close and personal.

At the same time little brother Bobby was in now way, ideologically, like his older brother, and eventual killer and Socialist Teddy.

Care to trade two Clintons and an Obama for a John Kennedy. I’d give my left peanut for that trade.


41 posted on 11/20/2013 8:38:32 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Ted Cruz...2016-24 ...A New Conservative Era)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: PLD

I’ve read that Joe DiMaggio thought the Kennedys had Marilyn killed—apparently Joe and Marilyn were about to remarry at the time of her death.


42 posted on 11/20/2013 8:40:03 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

LOL...great stuff.

Dems love their head.


43 posted on 11/20/2013 8:40:43 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Ted Cruz...2016-24 ...A New Conservative Era)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
Playboy contributor Lisa DePaulo talked exclusively to June DiMaggio, close friend of Monroe and niece of Monroe;s ex-husband, Yankee legend Joe DiMaggio. June and other DiMaggio friends talked openly about a last-minute second wedding allegedly planned by Monroe and DiMaggio, and Monroe& last night alive. The article also features uncensored and expanded transcripts of audio tapes of Monroe& psychotherapy sessions. The tapes, which were detailed in part by the Los Angeles Times in August, reveal for the first time, in Monroe& own words, that the actress was not suicidal at the time of her death. this is what I found on it..I have never head the rumor..
44 posted on 11/20/2013 8:50:29 AM PST by PLD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
RE: "He saw the Berlin Wall, Vietnam, and Cuba as good vs. evil fights. He knew the coercive nature of Khrushchev’s Soviet Russia. He saw the brute for of it up close and personal."

If he was all that how come Khrushchev made an ass of him and he had to find some way to save his manhood?

If he hadn't been doped-up or whatever his problem was when he met Khrushchev the events in VN would likely to have been entirely different.

.. and yes the Democrat Party of Kennedy is no longer.. the 1960's Marxist-Alinksy campus radical, psycho spoiled brats took over the Party in the 1970s.

45 posted on 11/20/2013 9:04:35 AM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: scooby321
President Kennedy's inaugural address in Washington D.C. In his speech President Kennedy urges American citizens to participate in public service and "ask not what your country can do for you- ask what you can do for your country."

Speechifying is what Dems do.

Obama/Clinton both blatherers that convinced millions how wonderful they were. Both blatherers and both liars.

JFK was way overblown. Weak on communism which encouraged Russia and led to Vietnam.

46 posted on 11/20/2013 9:27:47 AM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
Special Forces he invented just for Vietnam

Are you democrat worshipers now saying that JFK "invented" the Army Special Forces?

47 posted on 11/20/2013 9:37:31 AM PST by ansel12 ( Democrats-"a party that since antebellum times has been bent on the dishonoring of humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
He saw the Berlin Wall, Vietnam, and Cuba as good vs. evil fights.

Are you kidding? The weak, incompetent, arrogant fool, gave us the Berlin Wall, Vietnam, and Cuba, now you democrat worshipers want to make his disasters his victories?

Yet you want to want to attack Reagan, the man who ended the Cold War.

48 posted on 11/20/2013 9:40:56 AM PST by ansel12 ( Democrats-"a party that since antebellum times has been bent on the dishonoring of humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: All
"ask not what your country can do for you- ask what you can do for your country"

Some claim it came from JFK's youth. A private school refrain: ". . . the youth who loves his Alma Mater will always ask not 'what can she do for me? but 'what can I do for her?'"

49 posted on 11/20/2013 9:52:31 AM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael

“If he was all that how come Khrushchev made an ass of him and he had to find some way to save his manhood?”

I take it from the Reston report, which is unconfirmed, that Kennedy was in shock at the intensity and brazenness of Khrus.

“If he hadn’t been doped-up or whatever his problem was when he met Khrushchev the events in VN would likely to have been entirely different.”

What is your perspective on that? I don’t see any linkage at all to their meeting.


50 posted on 11/20/2013 10:00:39 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Ted Cruz...2016-24 ...A New Conservative Era)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson