Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grania
I don't know if this meta-study was based on self-reporting (always the least reliable way to get information) or correlating medical records, or both.

Meta-analysis is even trickier when different studies use different definitions, different data sources or different verification criteria.

However, the article implies that the statistical methodology here was quite sound. I expect the Abortion Industry to come down on it with a blizzard of obfuscation, shuffling and denial in 3 - 2- 1 . . . . .

3 posted on 12/02/2013 8:00:57 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("If you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullsh*t.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o

I’d think the Chinese study would be MORE accurate than the others. They’d have more complete records about abortions a woman has had.


4 posted on 12/02/2013 8:05:49 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson