Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Danger of Maxine Waters Running the Banks is Real
Townhall.com ^ | December 3, 2013 | John Ransom

Posted on 12/03/2013 4:08:16 AM PST by Kaslin

Inflation has been tame in the U.S. during the Obama administration, at least in regards to things the government is worried about, like wages.

If one looks at the official CPI measurements, inflation isn’t a problem. Deflation however could be, according to the Fed’s Politburo of Governors.

Falling prices, which presumably would give the rest of us relief at the checkout counter, if it wouldn’t do anything to add to our paycheck, is the biggest danger to the safety of our Republic, say central bankers.

“The Consumer Price Index… decreased 0.1 percent in October on a seasonally adjusted basis, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Over the last 12 months, the all items index increased 1.0 percent before seasonal adjustment.”

That puts inflation just between one and none for the year.

Officially, anyway.

But the system of measurement that the government uses is geared to only record inflationary pressures in areas the government would like to control, like how much your paycheck and my paycheck is growing.

For the Fed, the ultimate sin of the economy is rising wages. When wages start to go up, look out. That’s when the Fed will start to hike interest rates to “cool” things off.

If you look at the way inflation was calculated prior to either the “reforms” in calculating CPI made by the government in 1990 or 1980, says the economic site ShadowStats, inflation is running near 5 percent or 9 percent respectively.

That rate includes the things that matter to you and me like food, energy, rents and clothes.

You know? The little things in life.

And those rates are quite unsettling considering how anemic our economy is.

I would say that anything above 10 percent inflation as calculated using the “prior to 1980” formula is likely a strain on the economy. The strain could cause—likely would cause-- the country to eventually go into a recessionary spiral no matter how low our wages remain or how anemic economic velocity is here at home.

The chart above tends to confirm that there was some link between spiking inflationary pressures and the financial crash of 2008.

As I have said before, I think the culprit was rising gas prices. Others may disagree.

Certainly consumers and producers are getting some relief today by lower gas prices, but that relief could be short term as long as our government pretends that low cost energy isn’t beneficial for the country.

But here’s the part that has me a little concerned and it’s tinged with good news and bad news: The good news is that bank lending is up and it’s helping both business and consumers.

Reports Reuters:

"I think what we're seeing in the U.S. is that capital ratios have improved. We're now seeing pretty robust lending," Boston Federal Reserve President Eric Rosengren told reporters on the sidelines of a conference in the United Arab Emirates on financial regulation.

Asked where U.S. bank loans were going, he replied: "It's going both to the C&I, commercial and industrial, sector - it's also going to the consumer sector. That's exactly what you'd want to get with what we're doing with monetary policy, with the banks providing lending to both the households and the firms."

The bad news is that that means that all that money that has been pumped into the system by the Federal Reserve through quantitative easing and other monetary stimulus efforts—a record amount of money now sits in accounts in the United States—will start to increase monetary velocity, meaning it will change hands more frequently.

And when that happens, inflation will surely follow.

Now imagine how bad things will get if Maxine Waters ends up running the financial services committee in the United States House of Representatives while we have an inflationary peak and the economy is in another crisis.

Today the essential element of inflation is the availability of credit, not necessarily money supply.

And Congress can put pressure on banks to loan money regardless of circumstances, income, credit or risk.

“We must ensure that reform of this complicated market is accomplished in a manner that provides opportunity to Americans on all income levels," said Waters recently about her proposal for the government to guarantee the housing market, "protects taxpayers and consumers, and brings equity and accountability to all actors within our financial system."

Note her omission of Congress when it comes to accountability.

Inflation, generally speaking, happens in a flash. Where there is no inflation, suddenly in a period of six months or so, inflation becomes a problem.

For example, from December of 1977 inflation went from a relatively mild 4 percent annualized rate to 12 percent by June 1978. And then it took until 1981 to stabilize and reverse the inflation trend.

One way of looking at it—I explain this especially for Rep. Maxine Water who WILL be the US House chair of the financial system if Dems win a majority in the House-- is to think of the money supply as fuel in a propane tank, the banking system as the hose that carries the fuel and inflation as the fire. If you suddenly expand the size of hose by loaning more money, you will add more fuel to your fire.

The mistake the government types are making has been they have been adding more fuel as a substitute for taking care for the size of the hose—the hose being the banking sector.

The private economy has a way of adapting, however, even to government policies that we have today. It wants a larger hose and will eventually get one by its own efforts. In the meantime the government has pumped the tank with more fuel under higher pressure.

When that record fuel under higher pressure meets that expanding hose, a conflagration is what we’ll get.

And it will be years in taming. Maybe decades if Maxine Waters gets her shot.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: maxinewaters

1 posted on 12/03/2013 4:08:16 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

We’re going off the rails on a crazy train!


2 posted on 12/03/2013 4:11:27 AM PST by windsorknot (>>>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
“The Consumer Price Index… decreased 0.1 percent in October on a seasonally adjusted basis, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Over the last 12 months, the all items index increased 1.0 percent before seasonal adjustment.”

That puts inflation just between one and none for the year.

Simply not believable.

3 posted on 12/03/2013 4:27:42 AM PST by Graybeard58 (_.. ._. .. _. _._ __ ___ ._. . ___ ..._ ._ ._.. _ .. _. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

It’s nothing but spin in favor of the 0bama administration


4 posted on 12/03/2013 4:31:11 AM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
One way of looking at it—I explain this especially for Rep. Maxine Water who WILL be the US House chair of the financial system if Dems win a majority in the House

Heaven help us. Out of a group of liberal morons in the house, she is among the bottom 4 or 5 in intellegence and that's saying a lot.

5 posted on 12/03/2013 4:34:05 AM PST by Graybeard58 (_.. ._. .. _. _._ __ ___ ._. . ___ ..._ ._ ._.. _ .. _. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The banking system is a creature of the state. Banks would be in no danger with Maxine Waters as chair of the committee. What banks fear most is an anti-statist (i.e. libertarian) getting the role.


6 posted on 12/03/2013 4:37:04 AM PST by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: windsorknot

at 82 miles an hour!


7 posted on 12/03/2013 4:39:49 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

First time I’ve heard of the “propane tank” analogy. So far the Fed has been socking away their electronically created money in the bond and stock markets and using them as reservoirs. Or propane tanks if you wish. They’ve been trying to do this to keep the money out of circulation, suppress the velocity, and keep inflation tamped down. One of two things will happen; the money will “leak” out of the tank sooner or later and trigger some Weimar-style inflation, or the money pumped in will create a bubble that will burst. The markets crash. I’m guessing the fed is hoping for the latter, as the crash causes the money the made to just as easily disappear.

Having Maxine Waters anywhere around the levers of the banking system guarantees whatever bad outcome happens will be much worse.


8 posted on 12/03/2013 4:54:39 AM PST by henkster (Communists never negotiate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

“That puts inflation just between one and none for the year.

Simply not believable.”

If you buy a new TV set and computer, and eat them over the course of a month or two, it makes perfect sense.


9 posted on 12/03/2013 5:32:27 AM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

For the Fed, the ultimate sin of the economy is rising wages. When wages start to go up, look out. That’s when the Fed will start to hike interest rates to “cool” things off.
...........................................................

So: Does this mean that the Government is trying to destroy us by wanting to raise the minimum wage?

The thought of Maxine waters rising to any level higher than a toilet maid at a Casino is frightening to me.


10 posted on 12/03/2013 5:41:17 AM PST by Venturer (Keep Obama and you aint seen nothing yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: windsorknot

Oh, just let her get in there and run it.
We’ve long passed the point of putting on the brakes and avoiding the bridge out ahead.

She’d at least rip the veil off and start blatant cash transfers from white people to black people instead of hiding this transfer behind proxy programs.


11 posted on 12/03/2013 5:43:39 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Just as a minority of Jewish people were often the face or front for others in the communist-Marxist takeover in the 20th century who would have thought Blacks would serve a similar function in the USA. Black run cities and in all Hollywood shows and in America. Banana republic for our own good you filthy racist.


12 posted on 12/03/2013 6:57:17 AM PST by Sheapdog (Chew the meat, spit out the bones - FUBO - Come and get me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Look at the idiot guy in the background!

Though in reality he’s probably a full-on liberal in full climax just to be sharing a stage with two of the most incompetent dolts in congressional history (and that’s saying a lot), he seems to be thinking “Wot da fock am I doing up here!?”


13 posted on 12/03/2013 8:59:38 AM PST by Husker8877
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
That group photo at the header is one of the ugliest, grimmest snapshots I've ever seen. Those people are grisly stupid and malicious.
14 posted on 12/03/2013 3:10:07 PM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson