Skip to comments.Al-Qaeda: Death to Shi'ites for 'Damaging Mohammed's Legacy'
Posted on 12/07/2013 11:34:36 PM PST by Eleutheria5
Branch of al-Qaeda vows death to Shi'ites for 'cursing the prophet Mohammed'; urges terrorists to keep fighting in Iraq, Sinai peninsula.
A video has surfaced from the Al Qaeda-affiliated Islamic State of Iraq and al-Shams (ISIS) in Iraq and Syria advocating the systemic genocide of Shi'ite Muslims for allegedly "damaging Mohammed's legacy" in perpetrating their beliefs.
The video opens with a speech from a judge in the northern Syrian city of Aleppo, which has been a focal point of territorial fighting between the forces of Syrian President Bashar Assad and rebel forces. The judge's job: to establish rule over the Syrian city through the implementation of Sharia, or Islamic religious law - including doling out execution orders.
Brandishing a Kalashnikov assault rifle, the judge turns to jihadi fighters in the Sinai Peninsula, urging them to resist calls from the Egyptian army to back down from fighting.
"Don't fear the Egyptian or Israeli armies, the judge declares" and calls for jihadi fighters to renounce their commanding officers and remind them that on the Islamic Day of Judgement, they will be held accountable for calling off the (global) Jihad pan-Islamist organizations like Al Qaeda support.
(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...
Aren’t about half of the goathumpers shites? That works for me!
They rule in Iran. It’s like a buy-1-get-1-free sale.
ragheads killing ragheads? = cleaning up the planet
Once Jews are gone they will go back to killing each other.
Sounds good to me.
With these yellow-toothed dirtbags, it’s hard to tell whether they have a mustache or long, trained nosehair.
I have read that Obama always sides with the Sunnis, since he is a Sunni.
His latest deal with Iran seems to be an exception. Or am I mistaken in thinking the Iranian mullahs are Shi’ite.
To me, they’re all a heaping pile of Shi’it
Mad Mo is damaged goods for all of eternity. His legacy is sealed in cement.
Let them have their fun killing each other.
Better that than killing others.
...urges terrorists to keep fighting in Iraq, Sinai peninsula... the Al Qaeda-affiliated Islamic State of Iraq and al-Shams (ISIS) in Iraq and Syria advocating the systemic genocide of Shi'ite Muslims for allegedly "damaging Mohammed's legacy" in perpetrating their beliefs... Brandishing a Kalashnikov assault rifle, the judge turns to jihadi fighters in the Sinai Peninsula, urging them to resist calls from the Egyptian army to back down from fighting. "Don't fear the Egyptian or Israeli armies, the judge declares" and calls for jihadi fighters to renounce their commanding officers and remind them that on the Islamic Day of Judgement, they will be held accountable for calling off the (global) Jihad pan-Islamist organizations like Al Qaeda support.Thanks Eleutheria5.
There are a lot of morons out there who claim there’s a strict Sunni-Shia split, and that every jihadist is a Sunni. They are either ignorant or liars. Jihad is jihad — jihadists don’t care where the funding comes from or who writes the check.
Zero sided with the Iranian-allied Morsi regime in Egypt (and he still does); he pretended to support the uprising in Syria, but rolled right over on that; his let’s-give-mullahs-nukes deal with Iran isn’t new, it’s part of his pattern.
Obama bows to the Saudi kings. Then he acquiesces to the Iranian mullah’s demands for uranium enrichment on the way to the atomic bomb. Then he takes the side of the Al-Qaeda dominated Syrian rebels against Iran’s client, Assad, infuriating the Saudis.
WTF is going on here? Is it that he can’t deny anything to any Muslim who asks, but doesn’t want to take sides?
I wish I’d read your post before I wrote mine.
The perspective that jihad trumps the split, usually, and that Obama wasn’t as serious about Syria as he was about helping Iran is very interesting. It would explain why he backed Qaddafy’s overthrow—even though it gave Sunni (Al-Qaeda linked) radicals a lot of power. So, he’s a jihadist first, an Iranian sympathizer second (or maybe that’s Valerie Jarrett talking), and an overall Islamist supporter third.
We should always fund and send arms to whichever faction is losing......
Wer’nt they also known as Fatimads back in the Crusades and controlled Egypt for a while?
Yes, that way everything stays evenly balanced, and they keep at it.
Fat heads, who need to take their meds (well, that’s what Jethro done said it means, and he bin to Oxferd Elementary).
Behead one get one.
Let’s see what he says to a Suffi Kurdish nationalist about carving out a Kurdish state from bits of Iran, Iraq, Syria and Turkey.
Bring your own scimitar
Break In A Sex Slave
Islam seems to be at its rancid best in Syria, our national broadcaster SBS, tells us that there are some 2,000 militia groups in Syria, many fighting each other...and the latest ‘news’ was a video clip showing one group leader executing a kneeling row of muslim males ‘because they were not true muslims’ (maybe they were shia?)
With that many groups at each other’s throats, and more arriving every day, some from european countries, that’s a real honeypot going on there...while the perfumed princes of the House of Saud stay well away.
The Australian government has recently cancelled the passports of some 100 Lebanese suspected by ASIO of planning to go and fight in Syria. Four have already been killed, and the man who arranged their participation has been arrested.
Why keep them in Australia? Let them go get their heads blown off. Why let Muslims into Australia in the first place? There are more tropical diseases for them to die of in New Zealand.
‘’Since when did making [a] personal sacrifice to assist the oppressed become an immoral act? Why has it been made a criminal offence? Why is it OK for Australian troops to partake in conflicts overseas under the pretext of supporting the oppressed, but not so for Muslims?’’
Huge mistake to keep them here imo, I would let them ALL go, and would be happy to contribute to their air fares.
The Australian government maintains the concern is that when they return they will be so radicalized they will be a threat. I think it would make more sense to refuse re-entry.
But they are Australian citizens, many of them born here.
“I think it would make more sense to refuse re-entry.”
“But they are Australian citizens, many of them born here.”
Maybe change the constitution so they lose their citizenship the moment they fight in an armed forces other than Australia’s, but can get it reinstated by significantly demonstrating contrition.
I would skip that reinstatement offer, muslims lie and contrition wasn’t in mohammad’s instruction book.
He backed Qaddafy’s overthrow just as he backed Mubarak’s overthrow, and both were of benefit to jihad. I’m reminded of one of Voltaire’s:
[q] if I had to choose, I should detest the tyranny of one man less than that of many. A despot always has his good moments; an assembly of despots never. If a tyrant does me an injustice, I can disarm him through his mistress, his confessor or his page; but a company of grave tyrants is inaccessible to all seductions. When it is not unjust, it is at the least hard, and never does it bestow favours. [/q]
Saudi Arabia has been against jihad, although a lot of financing and volunteers have come from (shall we say) NGOs in the Kdm. The House of Saud was against the overthrow of Mubarak (which was an interal coup and removal), and for the overthrow of Morsi and that of Assad. Iran supports Assad and supported Morsi. Mubarak called for Assad to step down after the crackdown in Syria backfired, and Assad was happy to see Mubarak removed. Morsi’s closest ally was Iran, which condemned Morsi’s overthrow. Iran’s client Assad cheered when Morsi fell. Turkey was in favor of Morsi and against his removal, and has half-assed supported some of the forces fighting to topple Assad.
This is daffy:
> Muammar Gaddafi seized power through a bloodless military coup in 1969. Forty two years later, his life and reign ended violently as he was captured and killed when his convoy was attacked by NATO warplanes October 20, 2011.
But all they have to do to be allowed back in is take out a Qoran and piss on it;-)
Jews who go off to fight for Israel would have to piss on the Torah, and Christians who go off to fight for whomever would have to piss on the New Testament. Hindus, the Baghavad Ghita. Randies on Atlas Shrugged, and Commies on the Manifesto. That way it’s fair and unbiased. Proof of contrition is pissing on the most sacred text of your faith just to sing Waltzing Matilda over beer again. Exceptions would be made where the returnee got express written permission from the government to go off and join a foreign army.
They would be allowed to do that if some ugly fat imam in a filthy night-shirt and a flea-ridden beard gave them permission. There’s nothing that’s forbidden in that toilet-paper book as long as it furthers the aims of the dead pedophile-warlord-psychopath-most-perfect-man-who-ever-lived, plagiarist-epileptic prophet.
What I know about islam started in 2003 when I read this biography:
and if I were able, I would give every muslim male regardless of age, written permission and a ‘plane ticket to Syria, where they can eliminate each other, sect after sect. It’s what mohammad predicted would happen, and who am I to stand in the way of the ‘prophet’?
Oh, well there is that. I guess some poor fools will have to take the wrap and the everlasting infamy of topping the vile bastards one at a time, then. Not that I approve of that sort of thing, or advocate it.
But in case many, many people and I are all wrong about everything and we really are just lost among the stars with no final redemption forthcoming ever, It’d be nice to know that there’s a big island/continent somewhere to which I can escape with my family. That assurance helps give me the courage to believe and continue living in the eye of the Storm. I believe with complete faith, but just in case, there’s always Australia.
That’s spelled ‘the profit’. He was a true profit, very profitable.
The sand-monkeys had no idea what a prophet was until the feral mohammad heard what was written in the Original Testament, and attempted to become a phrophet as a means to an end, and was rejected.
How is al-Qa’ida different than the infamous, effective warrior, Muhammad, that forced his will into existence?
But he yielded such true profits.
‘profits’ only as the result of the possessions of others being nothing but ‘booty’.
I am currently reading, for the second time, ‘Arabia in the 19th Century’
It’s all about raiding, slaughter, stealing, cutting down date palms, poisoning wells and one tribe against another.
One tribe against another? That should be encouraged. Make sure that every Arab knows whether his neighbor is a Yemen or a Qys. None of them should ever forget their roots, and how wicked the other guys are.
‘Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the world, and all of us against the infidel. — Leon Uris, ‘The Haj’
Go for it.
Great book. One of Leon’s best.
Poor sentence structure, good thought.