Skip to comments.Liberal rhetoric goes nuclear in 2013
Posted on 12/10/2013 12:21:52 PM PST by Kaslin
Liberals took the nuclear option in 2013 and there may be no return to civil discourse. I'm not talking about curtailing Senate filibusters, although they did that, too, but to the shameful escalation in political rhetoric. Tired of calling conservatives "extreme," "greedy" or "heartless," and having overplayed more creative invectives like "tea-bagger," liberal pundits and politicians took the ad hominem argument to a new low this year.
During the Obamacare funding debate, Democrats called their rivals "anarchists," "arsonists," "extortionists," "jihadists," and "kidnappers," words normally associated with criminal activity. They had not quite hit bottom, however. A month later, former MSNBC commentator Martin Bashir suggested someone poop in Sarah Palin's mouth. Apparently Bashir was offended by Palin's comparison of the U.S. debt held by the Chinese to slavery.
"[I]t'll be like slavery when that note is due," Palin told a group in Iowa, "We are going to beholden to the foreign master." While not the most artful comparison, it wasn't deserving of an execrable mouthful from Bashir. Bashir has since apologized and resigned from the cable network, hopefully quelling any potential for a potty polemic craze on the left.
Just days after Bashir's gaffe, lefty singer Cher tweeted, "Go to the dictionary, & look up the 'C' word, ... next 2 the definition ... you'll see a pic of Sarah Palin! No ... wait ... she's under dumb C word." It's a slight improvement over Bill Maher's C-word attack on Palin last year. No self-censorship then, he actually said the full word.
While the Daily Kos/Moveon. org crowd favored Republican-Nazi comparisons during the Bush years, they prefer Tea Party-Nazi comparisons nowadays. This year, a campaign flyer by Rep. Alan Grayson, D-Fla., likened the Tea Party to the KKK, an ironic comparison given the Klan's political history.
Even though some politicians and pundits have apologized for their offensive remarks, the damage to political dialogue is done. Words cannot be unsaid. So why say such nasty things in the first place? There are a couple of reasons the left has gone rhetorically nuclear. Not only does it get media attention, but vitriol works. The point of vilifying opponents is to ostracize them. People don't want to be associated with tea baggers, political arsonists, or extremists. Calling someone names, even if one has to later apologize, is sometimes worth the gamble if it alienates one's political foes from the general public.
Understandably, decent people don't want to be called criminals, body parts or villains. To avoid being a target, it is all too easy to bow to political correctness and never speak up. The ultimate goal of ad hominem attacks is to silence one's opponents. Have nothing to counter an opponent's concern that $17 trillion in national debt can shackle the next generation? No worries, just suggest someone poop in her mouth. That'll choke off debate.
Last line makes the whole article!
I know: what leaders?
And that's why Democrats know they can say any incendiary thing they want and get away with it. Because no one in the worthless, ball-less, spineless GOP elite is willing to call them out.
We need a comprehensive list of liberal stupid and crazy for reminding people. It can include everything from voting for the bill to see what’s in it, tampon earrings, sacred abortion, to Sarah Silverman auctioning of her used maxi pads to raise money for Wendy Davis.
How dare these scum call us extreme and crazy.
Okay, you start.
The Pubbies are being “statesmen”. They are maintaining their decorum. They are getting their asses kicked.
In an ideal world, the media would police such language.
However, the media are collaborators, if not initiators of many such outrageous attacks.
On the other hand, Republicans have nothing to lose; and that’s an eviable situation to be in—No matter what you do, they can’t call you much worse than they already have.
Grow a pair and start busting heads—Literally. The press has shown that they are not worthy of the protections afforded to them in the Constitution.
Republican leaders are fighting back by cutting off funds to TEA party folks.
I wouldn’t put it past them to use PAC’s to fund dems where a TEA party might win.
Remember when Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital bought out a company and a woman lost her insurance? Think of the names that were thrown at Romney over that. Murderer. Vampire.
You ain’t seen nuthin’ yet.
IMO Obama has effectively just outsourced the remaining 3 yrs. of his Presidency to John Podesta and the Centers for American Progress. They are the ones driving this mantra of income inequality being the #1 most critical issue of our times.
And there is a whole lot more loopy lunacy lurking in THAT organization.
blah blah blah
The difference is, it wasn’t his company anymore.
That might be an exact quote from John Boehner or Mitch McConnell. Undistinguished and indistinguishable. Happy capons, both of them.
We need to have that list played at least once every day on radio!
Sharp as a marble; just like our GOP elitists. And almost half as eloquent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.