Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LAWMAKERS RUSH TO CATCH UP ON GAY MARRIAGE
Associated Press ^ | December 12, 2013 | Josh Lederman

Posted on 12/12/2013 8:41:08 AM PST by kobald

For years, American opinion on gay marriage has been shifting. Now lawmakers are in a mad dash to catch up.

In less than two weeks, seven senators--all from moderate or Republican-leaning states--announced their support, dropping one by one like dominos. Taken together, their proclamations reflected a profound change in the American political calculus: For the first time, elected officials from traditionally conservative states are starting to feel it's safer to back gay marriage than risk being the last to join the cause...

"They're reflecting what they're seeing in the polls--except the most extreme of the Republican base," former New Jersey Gov. Christine Todd Whitman, a Republican who supports gay marriage, said in an interview. "From a purely political perspective, if you want to be a leader of the future, you look at the next generation. They are overwhelmingly in favor of this."..

Among Republicans, whose party platform opposes gay marriage, the shift in position has mostly been limited to former lawmakers and prominent strategists. Still, a distinct change in tone was palpable this month when Ohio Sen. Rob Portman, a Republican whom presidential candidate Mitt Romney vetted last year as a potential running mate, declared his support, citing a personal conversion stemming from his son coming out to him as gay.

Rather than blast Portman for flouting party dogma or failing an ideological litmus test, Republican leaders shrugged, indicating that even if Republicans, as a party, aren't prepared back gay marriage, they won't hold it against those in their ranks who do...

"It's like immigration. The party realizes they are on the losing side of some of these issues," said former Rep. Jim Kolbe, an Arizona Republican...

(Excerpt) Read more at the-review.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: culturaldecay; equality; gaymarriage; homonaziagenda; homosexualagenda; politics; trends
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: Oliviaforever
“For years, American opinion on gay marriage has been shifting.”

Americans are now, have been and forever will be against gay marriage.

You've got that right. What's been shifting is the poll language and the propaganda. There has been at least 3 poll language changes in the longest running poll on the subject, each time neutralizing more the concept of what is really happening.

Homosexual --> Gay
Gay --> Same-sex
etc.

41 posted on 12/13/2013 2:20:09 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: highball
If we continue to hold on to that statement in the face of all contrary evidence, we’ll never reverse the tide. We used to hold on to the statement that “Americans have never voted for gay marriage and never will.” It’s only true until it isn’t.

Only, they haven't. Virtually every time citizens are allowed to vote on the subject, they reject it. The elections in 2012 were some of the most corrupt, fraudulent elections in our nation's history. I fully contend that NONE of the marriage redefinition state elections really fell on the side of the sodomites. There is massive circumstantial evidence to back that assertion up.

And Obama didn't even fairly win. All of the swing states fell to him, against almost all the current polls, and there was, again, massive evidence in each of these states of election fraud.

42 posted on 12/13/2013 2:25:27 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

I’m sorry, but there’s so much in there that’s simply not true.

There is no credible evidence of systemic voter fraud. That’s sore-loser excuse making. It gives us a convenient out to avoid a hard look at our strategy and tactics.

Not to mention that everyone who was actually paying attention to the polls in the last month of the election knew without a doubt that Obama was going to be re-elected. Couldn’t have been more clear. The only people thinking otherwise were the ones like Dick Morris, who are paid lots of money to lie to us and tell us what we want to hear, no matter how silly or false.

And here’s the problem with listening to those liars - it’s dangerous. Dangerous because we convince ourselves that we’re doing fine and then get killed on Election Day. Romney fell for this - he swallowed the “un-skewed polls” lie so hard that he more or less shut down his GOTV operations, leaving his volunteers stranded without tools or instructions. If he had instead looked at the situation objectively, he would have doubled and tripled those efforts, rather than canceling them in favor of victory parties.

That’s also the problem with burying our heads in the sand and pretending that voter fraud is somehow widespread and rampant. It excuses our failures and lets us avoid having to figure out where we messed up. So we can go on repeating those mistakes.

I was first attracted to conservatism in high school because the conservatives I knew were steely-eyed realists who saw the world as it was, not as they wanted it to be. Liberals lived in a utopia of their own imaginations, refusing to accept unpleasant truths about the world. What a difference a few decades make - too many conservatives are now living in their own fantasies (dystopias this time). We didn’t lose that election, we were cheated. Nonsense.

I don’t want to repeat 2008. Or 2012. I want a new outcome next time, but we won’t get one if we can’t honestly acknowledge out faults. That’s long past time.


43 posted on 12/13/2013 4:51:55 PM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: highball

Yep. The first step toward finding a path to victory is “pull your head out of you @$$ so you can see where you are”.


44 posted on 12/15/2013 10:59:47 AM PST by kobald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
Sorry, but you have to deal with the facts as they are, not the facts as you would like them to be.
45 posted on 12/15/2013 11:01:36 AM PST by kobald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: kobald

You’re quoting Wikipedia as some sort of authoritative source? Please!


46 posted on 12/15/2013 11:26:55 AM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: highball
"I want a new outcome next time, but we won’t get one if we can’t honestly acknowledge out faults. That’s long past time."

So if you can't beat the sexual fetish promoters, join them and be full of "pride"? Your brand of "conservatism" is more idealistic rather than realist, lol. Seamen and feces just produces a mess. Bumping vaginas and using the sexual organ for synthetic plungers produces nothing. Just like your idealistic same sex marriages in the face of what is natural.
47 posted on 12/15/2013 11:50:29 AM PST by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: highball
Semen interaction with feces just produces a mess as well, lol.
48 posted on 12/15/2013 11:52:30 AM PST by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: kobald

“Support for same-sex marriage generally correlates with lack of religious fundamentalism, young age, higher education, and residence in the Northeast and West Coast.”

So says a CNN (mostly gay employees) poll...

And Hollywood, television shows shove it down our throats...


49 posted on 12/15/2013 1:45:35 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: rollo tomasi

Look, if I actually wanted anything you seem to think I do, I’d say “sure, let’s keep on doing what we’re doing, because it’s secretly working really well!” Because it isn’t.

If we want to even try to stem this tide, as I’m sure you do too, we need to be honest with ourselves as to what’s working and what’s not. Hint: our strategy of the last half-decade or so is not working.

It’s not surrender to admit that you’re losing, so long as you are willing to change your losing ways.

Too many here would rather hide their heads in the sand and pretend that we’re really winning. That’s a recipe for gay marriage in all 50 states. Myself, I’d rather figure out a better way to stop it. You’ll have to choose which side you want to be on.


50 posted on 12/15/2013 6:20:24 PM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: fwdude; kobald

He doesn’t have to - there are plenty of polls showing that gay marriage has surpassed 50% nationally. And even though that is inflated by overwhelming support in certain large blue states, the overall trend in everything but the darkest red is still very, very disturbing.

So ball’s in your court - why is all of reality wrong and your hopes are correct? Why should we believe that we’ve already won this fight, against all actual evidence?


51 posted on 12/15/2013 6:32:13 PM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: highball

The “polls” you refer to are nearly all polls commissioned by homosexual groups. Therefore, the polling questions and the results are suspect.

Consider that wherever counterfeit marriage is enacted, it is nearly always by force, not by a direct vote of the people. This was even true in California, where homo-activists had to go federal to get their will imposed against the people.

And, no, I don’t believe that the four state referendums showing support for marriage redefinition were truly fair elections. There were massive, widespread irregularities in the 2012 elections, and they did NOT represent the views of the people.


52 posted on 12/15/2013 9:15:57 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: kobald

Get government out of marriage altogether. Leave it to the churches and the civil stuff to contracts.


53 posted on 12/15/2013 9:18:55 PM PST by Darren McCarty (Abortion - legalized murder for convenience)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

What is homosexual marriage without sodomy?


54 posted on 12/15/2013 9:19:22 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: highball

>> Why should we believe that we’ve already won this fight, against all actual evidence?

You should know that the pronoun “we” is something of an anathema to conservatives.


55 posted on 12/15/2013 9:46:28 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: highball
Only way to stop this is to hold fast to policies that are fruitful and to articulate, unabashedly and without concessions, those truths which the GOP are failing to do.

Also having to deal with a Marxist construct which emerged through academia starting in the "most prestigious Universities" that has spread and infected the corporate world along with the governing sector does not help either.
56 posted on 12/16/2013 9:10:38 AM PST by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

“I don’t believe that the four state referendums showing support for marriage redefinition were truly fair elections. There
were massive, widespread irregularities in the 2012 elections, and they did NOT represent the views of the people.”

The longer we hold on to such bizarre falsehoods, the harder it will be to win national elections. I propose we set aside the loony conspiracy theories and start as soon as possible.


57 posted on 12/16/2013 9:14:09 AM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: highball

You’re deluded. Drink up.


58 posted on 12/16/2013 9:26:13 AM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

So... that would be an admission that you don’t have any actual evidence, then?


59 posted on 12/16/2013 11:33:01 AM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson