Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists find second, 'hidden' language in human genetic code
Breitbart / United Press International ^ | December 12, 2013

Posted on 12/14/2013 12:28:54 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-64 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Remember that the theory of evolution only has 1) random selection and 2) mutation to explain existing complexity and invention (or future refinement).

It is not that DNA is getting more complex, it is how certain science has been at every step of discovery that they could finally fully understand it. The more complex that this explanation gets, the further it takes us from the supposition that the DNA-based architecture was itself the product of random selection and mutation.

The very mechanism of random selection and mutation, the DNA architecture, now becomes evolution’s own bete noire. The means by which evolution proposes to create new complexity is being shown instead as the means that new complexity cannot arise through random selection or mutation.


51 posted on 12/14/2013 6:57:12 AM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theBuckwheat
The very mechanism of random selection and mutation, the DNA architecture, now becomes evolution’s own bete noire. The means by which evolution proposes to create new complexity is being shown instead as the means that new complexity cannot arise through random selection or mutation.

It could well turn out to be that it isn't "random" at all, but that won't disprove evolution.

52 posted on 12/14/2013 7:06:20 AM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.


But assuming it is magic and not intelligence would be the mistake.


53 posted on 12/14/2013 7:10:49 AM PST by PeterPrinciple ( (Lord, save me from some conservatives, they don't understand history any better than liberals.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
HARVEST
54 posted on 12/14/2013 7:13:52 AM PST by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MuttTheHoople

How do they explain the origin of information? and now how will they explain it again?

“For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: .. “ Romans 1:20

The bible kindly inserts a perfect description of the r dawkins, n chomsky, b russell devotees in between with verses 1:21-24

“Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.” Romans 1:25


55 posted on 12/14/2013 7:27:40 AM PST by captmar-vell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Today’s word of the day is:

Palimpsest...


56 posted on 12/14/2013 8:07:21 AM PST by null and void (I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Evolutionists are left groveling in randomness in the only mechanism they have to explain DNA architecture. Sadly for them they have created a tautology: they believe that randomness is the only way to explain DNA architecture; DNA architecture is more complex than anyone can fully explain or even figure out in 40 years; therefore it must have been randomness that devised this; but there is not enough time in the life of the universe to provide even an improbable number of interaction opportunities to make this possible; but the only way to explain it is randomness, so this must prove that randomness was the creator of DNA architecture!

QED.

But one of the deans of modern evolutionary science, Richard Dawkins, admitted on camera that randomness was not the origins of DNA architecture. He said that intelligent aliens seeded life on earth. In a way he is right, but he quickly careens away from the compelling issue, the elephant in the room.

Evolution was devised to explain a creation without a Creator. Richard Dawkins admits to a creator, it is just a creator from some other planet. The Creator that Evolutionists are desperate to deny is the Creator God who will tell them things they don’t want to hear and judge them for their actions in their personal life that they do not want to acknowledge. If they can only prove that God doesn’t exist, that God cannot make demands on them, or judge them for their sins. And that is why people cling to evolution even as scientific research takes them closer to the Truth That Must Not Be Acknowledged.


57 posted on 12/14/2013 8:08:15 AM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai; Thylacine

Name him, ping him...


58 posted on 12/14/2013 8:08:44 AM PST by null and void (I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

But assuming it is magic and not intelligence would be the mistake.

Well said.

59 posted on 12/14/2013 8:14:42 AM PST by null and void (I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: theBuckwheat

Polemic is not a substitute for the scientific method.


60 posted on 12/14/2013 8:34:45 AM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; BwanaNdege
Just started to type the Pentecost reference when I saw your comment right below BwanaNdege's. Thanks! Saved me a lot of typing... '-)
61 posted on 12/14/2013 8:50:40 AM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias... "Barack": Allah's current ally...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: knarf; 2ndDivisionVet; SunkenCiv; All

By all means read Sean Carroll’s book Endless Forms Most Beautiful for what I think is a descriptive account of this second language in action.


62 posted on 12/15/2013 2:48:07 AM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
It's a before and after kind of thing, like Jeopardy uses, or like some online nicks. ;') It had actually been adopted by some skepticultists, they embraced it and made it their URL. My use of it seemed the road best travelled, since this had become a religion thread before I got here.
63 posted on 12/15/2013 4:25:56 AM PST by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
It had actually been adopted by some skepticultists, they embraced it and made it their URL.

That sounds an awful lot like "I saw it on the internet, so it must be true"

64 posted on 12/15/2013 4:28:42 AM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson