Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paul Ryan tells Tea Party to keep budget disagreements ‘within our conservative family’
The Daily Caller ^ | 12-15-2013 | Brendan Bordelon

Posted on 12/15/2013 4:30:03 PM PST by servo1969

Wisconsin Republican Rep. Paul Ryan tried to calm the burgeoning feud between Republican Party leadership and its conservative critics over the budget deal passed in the House this week, requesting that the Tea Party “keep these conversations within our family.”

Ryan appeared on “Fox News’ Sunday” with Chris Wallace to discuss the budget deal he brokered with Washington Democratic Sen. Patty Murray. The agreement, which passed the House on Thursday, scraps nearly one third of sequester cuts and replaces them with promised future reductions. Conservative groups largely came out against the deal, prompting an angry tirade from Speaker of the House John Boehner this week against the tea party. Wallace asked Ryan about the split:

WALLACE: Are you getting fed up with these outside groups who talk tough from the sidelines?

RYAN: Look, I think John just got his Irish up there. I think these groups are valuable. They way I look at it is this: they’re part of our conservative family. I’d prefer to keep these conversations within our family. John was frustrated because they came out against our agreement before we even reached an agreement.

I was frustrated about that as well, but I see the tea party as indispensable and valuable in helping keep the taxpayer in the game, keep Washington accountable. When we lost our majority in ’06 we deserved to lose it then, and they helped us get our ship righted again by being fiscally conservative. I think what we’re doing here today — we’ve tw0 thirds of the house conservatives voting for this — i think this is a step in the right direction. It’s not as far as I want to go, but it’s a step in the right direction.

Ryan later added he’d “love to talk to” Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, who claims the deal will add to spending now without reducing the debt in the future. “Marco’s a good friend of mine. I disagree with him respectfully.”

The congressman repeated his claim that the deal will maintain 92 percent of the sequester while avoiding government shutdowns, which have been political poison to Republicans in the past. He also cautioned that this deal didn’t mean serious disagreements between Democrats and Republicans were a thing of the past.

“Look, one step at a time Chris,” he said. “Patty Murray and I knew we weren’t going to solve every problem — like the debt limit problem — so we sought to find common ground to solve this problem, this problem being a shutdown possibly in January and then another shutdown possibly in October. And [Republicans] have got our principles established here.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 113th; budget; ryan; sequester; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: servo1969

The cheating dad says to keep his mistress out of the family breakup.


21 posted on 12/15/2013 4:46:16 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Fight Tapinophobia in all its forms! Do not submit to arduus privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

“I think these groups are valuable.”

IOW, we need your votes, now just shut up and vote for us.


22 posted on 12/15/2013 4:46:37 PM PST by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
This clown just plopped his rear down and made a deal with none other than Patty Murray, who is arguably the most leftist and dumbest Senator around, and completely surrendered whatever remaining conservative principles he had.

And he has the nerve to tell conservatives to pipe down?

What about the RINOs, who are out there surrendering, groveling, and compromising this nation away to oblivion?

23 posted on 12/15/2013 4:47:05 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Governor Sarah Heath Palin for President of the United States in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Zuckerberg-f**ker, Paul Ryan. Somebody make an anagram out of that!


24 posted on 12/15/2013 4:48:06 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

We aren’t family, Ryan and you are not Reagan. Nice try though.


25 posted on 12/15/2013 4:53:13 PM PST by stilloftyhenight (call it ODemocratcare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Tell that to Boehner.


26 posted on 12/15/2013 4:55:42 PM PST by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Ryan left the Tea Party when he make that god awful deal on the bidget with the Rats.


27 posted on 12/15/2013 4:59:52 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (From time to time the.tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Part of that bill, if I read it right, cuts the early retirement benefits of our military veterans, whom Ryan had well cuddled all during his election bids.

He’s becoming a turncoat.


28 posted on 12/15/2013 5:00:30 PM PST by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: INVAR

Guess now the Tea Party officially is an abused “woman/person.”


29 posted on 12/15/2013 5:03:23 PM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VRWC For Truth

“The agreement, which passed the House on Thursday, scraps nearly one third of sequester cuts and replaces them with promised future reductions.”

So, Ryan traded assured cuts for libtard promises of future cuts? Good move there, Skippy!

This is yet another piece of legislative tripe from the RINO’s and the socialists.


30 posted on 12/15/2013 5:08:58 PM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2016; I pray we make it that long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Too late, Paul. Your daddy Boner already told the world, loudly, that we conservatives have no credibility.


31 posted on 12/15/2013 5:11:56 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

“2-3 years” starts in a few months, Rep Ryan...

Hannity show, Mar 27, 2012:
HANNITY: What happens in two to three years if the bond market says, too much debt, we can’t give it to you anymore.

RYAN: We have a massive spike in interest rates. All the experts are telling us, we have about two to three years is the time frame they tell us, which is the bond markets. Remember, half of our debt is owned by foreigners. And 40 cents of every dollar government spends is borrowed money. So we are really in debt, I mean, to a huge amount. So the bond markets if they turn on us then our interest rates go up tremendously. That means car loans, housing loans, business loans, home loans, all of that is really expensive. It shuts down and slows down the economy. At the same time, you can have an inflation problem that can get out of control. So your money isn’t buying much as it used to because of the Federal Reserve hasn’t gotten inflation under control, we’ve got a real problem on our hands.


32 posted on 12/15/2013 5:12:10 PM PST by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

We’ve been telling the GOP party hacks for 2 election cycles now that we Conservatives are done with Battered Wife Syndrome.

We’re officially divorced from the party.

Anyone else who wants to continue to suffer abuse at their hands - no promise they make will ever be upheld, and no order of protection is going to save you.


33 posted on 12/15/2013 5:13:10 PM PST by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

FU Ryan!


34 posted on 12/15/2013 5:15:08 PM PST by tennmountainman (Just Say No To Obamacare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

We’re not related, Paul.


35 posted on 12/15/2013 5:19:31 PM PST by bergmeid (Resist we much!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

The problem, Cuzzin Paul is, you went against the family and we done kicked you out of the clan. Since you’re sleeping with the enemy, you can go hang with yer new in-laws now, just follow the smell of donkey crap...


36 posted on 12/15/2013 5:20:53 PM PST by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969; All

Well-stated right out of the box, servo1969.

FUPR

BUMP for GRRRRREAT FReeper comments.


37 posted on 12/15/2013 5:26:53 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

We are beginning to see the slightest sparks of intelligence from the R party. Some of them are seeing that the 2014 elections are coming and they will need more than a few dollars from big donors to cover the expenses AND they will actually need votes to win. That has not apparently been a concern to them previously. It has even been said the R party is willing to “lose a few elections” to purge the conservatives from the R party.

If they purge the conservatives, they will lose a little more than a few elections. Don’t these fools realise the Dem party is playing for complete control. When Reid changes the filibuster rule, it should be a clue that the Dem party, if in control for long, will change the system to one-party rule. The judiciary is being permanently altered to one-party socialist control. The Senate is very far into socialist control, the executive branch is firmly in socialist control, and the regulatory branch is filled with leftist idealogues.

So, R party, where are you looking to operate in the future federal government? And, why would anyone vote for an R if there is nothing substantive associated with the R party. If it doesn’t mean anything, who will know about the R party?

Where is the strategy? Where is the leadership? This is the worst I have ever seen in political party management.


38 posted on 12/15/2013 5:42:01 PM PST by iacovatx (Conservatism is the political center--it is not "right" of center)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Peter Schiff:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-12-15/peter-schiff-bashes-feeble-and-fictitious-budget-deal


39 posted on 12/15/2013 5:42:49 PM PST by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
There must be something in the water in Southern Wisconsin.

Nah, nothing in the water.
You just had a bright kid who was a rising conservative star become consumed by the Beltway. He's well on his way to being a high-paid lobbyist after his defeat next year, so he doesn't give a rat's rear about the base anymore.

40 posted on 12/15/2013 5:45:25 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Governor Sarah Heath Palin for President of the United States in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson