Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RegulatorCountry
“Stolen” is also misapplied when referring to Social Security. There always have been more benefits paid out to beneficiaries than paid in.

Not so. SS used to be a cash cow taking in more in revenue than it paid out in benefits. It is the reason why the excess was put into the SSTF in the form of interest bearing, non-market T-bills, which now total around $2.4 trillion.

In the early 1980s, SS went into the red, i.e., benefits exceeded revenue. It resulted in the Faustian bargain between Reagan and Tip O'Neil that increased taxes and reduced benefits, including raising the retirement age for full benefits from 65 to 67. They also forced all new hire federal employees into SS.

Now SS is costing us money as the General Fund must redeem T-bills from the SSTF to make up the shortfall.

Source: CBO “Combined OASDI Trust Funds; January 2011 Baseline” 26 Jan 2011.

Note: See “Primary Surplus” line (which is negative, indicating a deficit)

Social Security has passed a tipping point. For years it generated more revenue than it consumed, holding down the overall federal deficit and allowing Congress to spend more freely for other things. But those days are gone. Rather than lessening the federal deficit, Social Security has at last — as long predicted — become a drag on the government’s overall finances.

35 posted on 12/16/2013 9:06:35 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: kabar
Not so. SS used to be a cash cow taking in more in revenue than it paid out in benefits.

Re-read my sentence. Recipients have always received more benefits than paid in. Recipients, not Social Security as a whole.

37 posted on 12/16/2013 9:39:21 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson