Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese rover diorama shows Europe being nuked
io9 ^ | December 17, 2013 9:34 am | Robert T. Gonzales

Posted on 12/18/2013 12:05:48 AM PST by Olog-hai

China deserves all the congratulations in the world for landing its first spacecraft on the Moon. It’s a big deal – both for China and humanity at large. But can somebody please explain why the background image at this exhibit for China’s recently deployed Yutu Rover depicts a massive mushroom cloud over Europe? […]

The most likely explanation—the one we’re hoping for, anyway—is that this was just an unfortunate diplomatic oversight. As a redditor by the name of wigg1es points out, the backdrop is actually a stock image […] Still, there are undoubtedly those who will interpret the choice of image as a deliberate gesture. …

(Excerpt) Read more at io9.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chicoms; china; europeanunion; eussr; moon; nuclearwarfare; redchina; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-68 next last

1 posted on 12/18/2013 12:05:48 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Weirdest-looking land mass I’ve ever seen.

They know the USA will go bankrupt so Europe will be their only true competitor, sooooo.........


2 posted on 12/18/2013 12:13:50 AM PST by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

3 posted on 12/18/2013 12:15:15 AM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

we should have nuked the s#it out of them in 1950 when we had the chance


4 posted on 12/18/2013 12:23:51 AM PST by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
They know the USA will go bankrupt so Europe will be their only true competitor, sooooo.........

Europe will go down before we will.

5 posted on 12/18/2013 12:25:25 AM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
"I will not weaponize space"

"I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems"

-- Barack Obama, 2007 campaign trail
_____________________________________________________

2008 Pentagon Report (March 2008):
China's Growing Military Space Power

By Leonard David
Special Correspondent, SPACE.com
March 6, 2008

GOLDEN, Colorado — A just-released Pentagon report spotlights a growing U.S. military concern that China is developing a multi- dimensional program to limit or prevent the use of space-based assets by its potential adversaries during times of crisis or conflict.

Furthermore, last year's successful test by China of a direct-ascent, anti-satellite (ASAT) weapon to destroy its own defunct weather satellite, the report adds, underscores that country's expansion from the land, air, and sea dimensions of the traditional battlefield into the space and cyber-space domains.

Although China's commercial space program has utility for non- military research, that capability demonstrates space launch and control know-how that have direct military application. Even the Chang'e 1 — the Chinese lunar probe now circling the Moon — is flagged in the report as showcasing China's ability "to conduct complicated space maneuvers — a capability which has broad implications for military counterspace operations."

To read the entire publication [29.67MB/pdf], see U.S. Dept of Defense:
http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/pdfs/China_Military_Report_08.pdf
_____________________________________________________

"I will not weaponize space"

"I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems"

-- Barack Obama, 2007 campaign trail
_____________________________________________________

From the Sino-Russian Joint Statement of April 23, 1997:
"The two sides [China and Russia] shall, in the spirit of partnership, strive to promote the multipolarization of the world and the establishment of a new international order."

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/HI29Ag01.html

6 posted on 12/18/2013 12:26:25 AM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

I’m not betting on it. Daniel shows the last days kingdom is the most dreadful of Babylon, Medo-Persia and Rome. It is part Iron, the symbol for the Roman empire.

Admittedly it’s a mystery so I guess we shall see.

If we survive 8 years of Bammy, I’ll be surprised.


7 posted on 12/18/2013 12:32:37 AM PST by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
8 posted on 12/18/2013 12:36:22 AM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Most of the commenters in the article put the mushroom cloud over Moscow although to my eye, it looks north of Moscow, closer to St. Petersburg.


9 posted on 12/18/2013 12:44:42 AM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Back when Harry Truman dealt with McArthur (like a democrat) was before it was known democrats always make screwy decisions..

Democrats have always been Moonbats..
McArthur would have solved many problems during Korea with the Chinese.. and
Patton would have solved many problems in Europe by kicking the bejesus out of the Russians.. after WWII..

AND McCarthy would have solved many more problems by flushing out the commies out of the federal givernment...

It’s LACK OF exposing and prosecuting democrats is the source of most of AMericas problems.. for a hundred years..


10 posted on 12/18/2013 12:50:20 AM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Not to give the Chinese credit, but that mushroom cloud juts far out through the atmosphere, and I can see huge seismic waves tens of thousands of feet high radiating away from the cloud. My guess is someone decided to troll by using a picture of a life-ending impact on the planet.


11 posted on 12/18/2013 12:58:46 AM PST by wastedyears (The Ender's Game movie was a stupendous, colossal, galactic failure to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

KNowing China, they just stole that image from some comic book or something and didn’t notice the nuke.


12 posted on 12/18/2013 1:02:04 AM PST by MrShoop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop
"On December 3, The Beijing Times reported that Chinese experts are discussing whether the People’s Liberation Army could establish a missile base on the Moon. Per the Taiwan-based, English-language site Want China Times:

An expert from the China National Space Administration's Lunar Exploration Programme Center told the [Beijing Times]that China plans to send its first astronaut to the moon by 2030. By 2050, the moon could become a base from which to send the country's manned spacecraft to explore deep space, the source said. [Want China Times]

Innocent enough, right? But the source added that the Moon could be transformed into a deadly weapon. Like the Death Star in Star Wars, the Moon could be used as a military battle station, bristling with ballistic missiles that could be launched against any military target on Earth.

Lest you think this is all science fiction, there has been a worrying trend toward a militarization of space. Officially, the Outer Space Treaty bars states from placing nuclear weapons or any other weapons of mass destruction in orbit around Earth, installing them on the Moon or any other celestial body, or otherwise stationing them in outer space. It exclusively limits the use of the Moon and other celestial bodies to peaceful purposes. China, the United States, and Russia are all party to this treaty. ..."

Yet in 2011, Wikileaks leaked documents showing that the United States and China had both shot down their own satellites using sophisticated missiles, with each country attempting to show the strength of its respective military capabilities in space.

http://theweek.com/article/index/254228/why-does-chinas-moon-rover-exhibit-show-a-nuclear-mushroom-cloud-over-europe
_____________________________________________________

"I will not weaponize space"

"I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems"

-- Barack Obama, 2007 campaign trail

13 posted on 12/18/2013 1:17:58 AM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

US worried about China’s nuke bombers hitting military bases

Nov 20, 2013

The United States is gravely concerned about China’s new long-range nuclear bombers that can target previously unreachable US military bases in the Pacific, according to a new report.

The US-China Economic and Security Review Commission warns in its annual report that China is "rapidly expanding and diversifying" its ability to strike US bases, ships and aircraft throughout the Pacific, even places like Guam that were previously out of reach, The Foreign Policy magazine reported on Wednesday.

The House Armed Services Committee is set to discuss China’s Hongzha-6K bomber at a hearing on Wednesday when members of the commission will testify about their report.

The US military has made Guam a key strategic military hub in the western Pacific as part of Washington’s new “pivot” strategy of realigning American forces toward Asia.

The report warned that China has become increasingly aggressive in the way it handles issues with US allies such as the Philippines and Japan.

"Although sovereignty disputes in the East and South China Seas are not new, China's growing diplomatic, economic, and military clout is improving China's ability to assert its interests," according to the report.

"It is increasingly clear that China does not intend to resolve the disputes through multilateral negotiations or the application of international laws and adjudicative processes but instead will use its growing power in support of coercive tactics that pressure its neighbors to concede to China's claims," it added.

China’s new drone, which resembles the MQ-9 Reaper, can be armed with Hellfire missiles, bombs and other weapons.

The commission also warned about the growth of the Chinese navy.

"By 2020, barring a US naval renaissance, it is possible that China will become the world's leading military shipbuilder in terms of the numbers of submarines, surface combatants and other naval surface vessels produced per year," said the report, citing Chinese military experts Andrew Erickson and Gabe Collins.

This is while the United States has planned to conduct more joint military exercises in western Pacific and encircle China with a chain of small air bases and military ports.

China is considering the Pentagon’s focus on the “pivot” to the Asia-Pacific as a strategy to counter China’s increasing global influence.

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/11/20/335709/us-worried-about-chinas-nuke-bombers/

14 posted on 12/18/2013 1:46:46 AM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

From Fox News, Nov 2013...

Pentagon, State Department silent on reports outlining Chinese nuclear attack plans on U.S. cities


15 posted on 12/18/2013 1:56:42 AM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Europe nuked? Finally, we get rid of the communist epi-center.


16 posted on 12/18/2013 1:58:16 AM PST by lafarge (Vote American Conservative Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Why would the Chinese attack the US? They would just destroy their equity; better to just foreclose on us...
17 posted on 12/18/2013 2:25:22 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai; All

I guess your average Free Trade Communist who supports Free Trade with Communist China...would get a thrill about this...


18 posted on 12/18/2013 2:28:42 AM PST by SeminoleCounty (Einstein was right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth29
Well, if you read The Art Of War, you’ll find this passage in there:
In the practical art of war, the best thing of all is to take the enemy’s country whole and intact; to shatter and destroy it is not so good. So, too, it is better to recapture an army entire than to destroy it, to capture a regiment, a detachment or a company entire than to destroy them.

Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy’s resistance without fighting.
Think that has been their strategy so far?
19 posted on 12/18/2013 2:35:34 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Maybe they scrambled to get this display together and found an old nuclear poster lying around and used it without thinking about this photo going global....or it's a fair warning and I'm glad the US is up wind of Europe! Underground bunkers anyone?

20 posted on 12/18/2013 2:45:07 AM PST by BCW (Salva reipublicae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Yes, only a severe miscalculation by either side will lead to more than a token military action IMHO.


21 posted on 12/18/2013 2:46:11 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ETL
"I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems."

In addition, I will spend the money saved to support an unproven and unwanted health care program.

-excerpts from "Unheard Quotes from barack obama," 2013.

22 posted on 12/18/2013 2:53:37 AM PST by Right Wing Assault
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Thank you Clinton White House for the technical leaks making all this possible!

Hillary was that you?


23 posted on 12/18/2013 2:55:54 AM PST by urbanpovertylawcenter (the law and poverty collide in an urban setting and sparks fly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ETL
"I will not weaponize space"
"I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems"
-- Barack Obama, 2007 campaign trail

And Americans voted for this. Twice.

24 posted on 12/18/2013 3:25:18 AM PST by TwelveOfTwenty (See my home page for some of my answers to the left's talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop
Indeed, the image is probably stolen from here

 

It could be Moscow...but that image is a rendering...and not very well done at that. Don't think there's anything sinister here, other than the digital artist not getting their scratch.

25 posted on 12/18/2013 3:32:21 AM PST by logi_cal869
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
No disrespect, but I'm just pointing out that this story would be mocked & deleted if it were sourced from Infowars.

Oops...they posted it, too. </sarc>

26 posted on 12/18/2013 3:35:29 AM PST by logi_cal869
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

I agree, I also say Truman was a traitor, as was Eisenhower. I’m of the opinion Patton was made to disappear.


27 posted on 12/18/2013 4:09:11 AM PST by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
China deserves all the congratulations in the world for landing its first spacecraft on the Moon. It’s a big deal – both for China and humanity at large.

Right. Welcome to 50 years ago.

28 posted on 12/18/2013 4:11:03 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (Play the 'Knockout Game' with someone owning a 9mm and you get what you deserve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869
Don't think there's anything sinister here

"Some have written the cloud off as a mistake or a coincidence, but this is not a Chinese teenager’s unauthorized blog. The lunar rover exhibit is a high-profile national project that Beijing designed for the world to view. The painting would have required the approval of dozens of high-level officials before becoming a facet of the exhibit.

“That’s not a small cloud either,” a Reddit user who goes by forte2 said of the painting. “[T]hat would have to be bigger than the Tsar Bomba by an order of magnitude.”

If the tables were turned and nasa or the esa had created artwork depicting nuclear weapons being detonated in China, firings and apologies would inevitably ensue. But it would be naive to expect such a reaction from Beijing. In fact, China’s state-run media recently reported on Beijing’s nuclear war plans, including missile strikes on U.S. cities that would kill upwards of 12 million Americans.

http://www.thetrumpet.com/article/11212.30893.0.0/world/military/giant-mushroom-cloud-covers-europe-in-painting-at-chinas-lunar-rover-exhibit

29 posted on 12/18/2013 4:31:39 AM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The Chinese who set up the display were from Beijing and innocently mistook the mushroom cloud as “smog”.


30 posted on 12/18/2013 4:35:54 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TwelveOfTwenty
And Americans voted for this. Twice

We DO have a growing stupidity crises in the country today, don't we.

Here's the full piece from 2008...

Obama Pledges Cuts in Missile Defense, Space, and Nuclear Weapons Programs

February 29, 2008 :: News
MissileThreat.com

A video has surfaced of Presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama talking on his plans for strategic issues such as nuclear weapons and missile defense.

The full text from the video, as released, reads as follows:

Thanks so much for the Caucus4Priorities, for the great work you've been doing. As president, I will end misguided defense policies and stand with Caucus4Priorities in fighting special interests in Washington.

First, I'll stop spending $9 billion a month in Iraq. I'm the only major candidate who opposed this war from the beginning. And as president I will end it.[i.e. end it, not win it]

Second, I will cut tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending.

I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems.

I will not weaponize space.

I will slow our development of future combat systems.

And I will institute an independent "Defense Priorities Board" to ensure that the Quadrennial Defense Review is not used to justify unnecessary spending.

Third, I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons. To seek that goal, I will not develop new nuclear weapons; I will seek a global ban on the production of fissile material; and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBMs off hair-trigger alert, and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenals.

You know where I stand. I've fought for open, ethical and accountable government my entire public life. I don't switch positions or make promises that can't be kept. I don't posture on defense policy and I don't take money from federal lobbyists for powerful defense contractors. As president, my sole priority for defense spending will be protecting the American people. Thanks so much.

Article: Obama Pledges Cuts in Missile Defense, Space, and Nuclear Weapons Programs:
http://missilethreat.com/archives/id.7086/detail.asp

"MissileThreat.com is a project of The Claremont Institute devoted to understanding and promoting the requirements for the strategic defense of the United States."

31 posted on 12/18/2013 5:09:25 AM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: urbanpovertylawcenter
Thank you Clinton White House for the technical leaks making all this possible!

The Idiot's Guide to Chinagate [flashback Bill Clinton]
richardpoe.com via newsmax.com | May 26, 2003 | Richard Poe

Posted on 01/21/2011 5:01:00 PM PST by ETL

"'We like your president. We want to see him reelected', former Chinese intelligence chief General Ji Shengde told Chinagate bagman Johnny Chung. Indeed, Chinese intelligence organized a massive covert operation aimed at tilting the 1996 election Clinton’s way."

The Idiot's Guide to Chinagate
By Richard Poe
May 26, 2003

CHINA WILL LIKELY replace the USA as world leader, said Bill Clinton in a recent Washington Post interview. It is just a matter of time. Clinton should know. He has personally done more to build China’s military strength than any man on earth.

Most Americans have heard of the so-called "Chinagate " scandal. Few understand its deadly import, however. Web sites such as "Chinagate for Dummies" and its companion "More Chinagate for Dummies" offer some assistance. Unfortunately, with a combined total of nearly 8,000 words, these two sites – like so many others of the genre – offer more detail than most of us "dummies" can absorb.

For that reason, in the 600 words left in this column, I will try to craft my own "Idiot’s Guide to Chinagate," dedicated to all those busy folks like you and me whose attention span tends to peter out after about 750 words. Here goes.

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, China presented little threat to the United States. Chinese missiles "couldn’t hit the side of a barn," notes Timothy W. Maier of Insight magazine. Few could reach North America and those that made it would likely miss their targets.

Thanks to Bill Clinton, China can now hit any city in the USA, using state-of-the-art, solid-fueled missiles with dead-accurate, computerized guidance systems and multiple warheads.

China probably has suitcase nukes as well. These enable China to strike by proxy – equipping nuclear-armed terrorists to do their dirty work, while the Chinese play innocent. Some intelligence sources claim that China maintains secret stockpiles of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons on U.S. soil, for just such contingencies.

In 1997, Clinton allowed China to take over the Panama Canal. The Chinese company Hutchison Whampoa leased the ports of Cristobal and Balboa, on the east and west openings of the canal respectively, thus controlling access both ways. A public outcry stopped Clinton in 1998 from leasing California’s Long Beach Naval Yard to the Chinese firm COSCO. Even so, China can now strike U.S. targets easily from their bases in Panama, Vancouver and the Bahamas.

How did China catch up so fast? Easy. We sold them all the technology they needed – or handed it over for free. Neither neglect nor carelessness are to blame. Bill Clinton did it on purpose.

As a globalist, Clinton promotes "multipolarity" – the doctrine that no country (such as the USA) should be allowed to gain decisive advantage over others.

To this end, Clinton appointed anti-nuclear activist Hazel O’Leary to head the Department of Energy. O’Leary set to work "leveling the playing field," as she put it, by giving away our nuclear secrets. She declassified 11 million pages of data on U.S. nuclear weapons and loosened up security at weapons labs.

Federal investigators [Cox Report] later concluded that China made off with the "crown jewels" of our nuclear weapons research under Clinton’s open-door policy – probably including design specifications for suitcase nukes. Meanwhile, Clinton and his corporate cronies raked in millions.

In his book The China Threat, Washington Times correspondent Bill Gertz describes how the system worked. Defense contractors eager to sell technology to China poured millions of dollars into Clinton’s campaign. In return, Clinton called off the dogs.

Janet Reno and other counterintelligence officials stood down while Lockheed Martin, Hughes Electronics, Loral Space & Communications and other U.S. companies helped China modernize its nuclear strike force.

"We like your president. We want to see him reelected," former Chinese intelligence chief General Ji Shengde told Chinagate bagman Johnny Chung. Indeed, Chinese intelligence organized a massive covert operation aimed at tilting the 1996 election Clinton’s way.

Clinton’s top campaign contributors for 1992 were Chinese agents; his top donors in 1996 were U.S. defense contractors selling missile technology to China.

Clinton recieved funding directly from known or suspected Chinese intelligence agents, among them James and Mochtar Riady who own the Indonesian Lippo Group; John Huang; Charlie Trie; Ted Sioeng; Maria Hsia; Wang Jun and others.

Commerce Secretary Ron Brown served as Clinton’s front man in many Chinagate deals. When investigators began probing Brown’s Lippo Group and Chinagate connections, Brown died suddenly in a suspicious April 1996 plane crash.

Needless to say, China does not share Clinton’s enthusiasm for globalism or multipolarity. The Chinese look out for Number One.

"War [with the United States] is inevitable; we cannot avoid it," said Chinese Defense Minister General Chi Haotian in 2000. "The issue is that the Chinese armed forces must control the initiative in this war." Bill Clinton has given them a good start.

The Idiot's Guide to Chinagate:
http://www.richardpoe.com/column.cgi?story=125

or,
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/5/26/214938.shtml
(this version hasn't the necessary hyperlinks, but the above doesn't seem to be available any longer)
_________________________________

Related Stories
Richard Poe, "Chinagate: The Third-Way Scandal" (June 3, 1999)
Christopher Ruddy, "Russia and China Prepare for War: Parts I - VIII," NewsMax.com (March 9 -18, 1999)
_____________________________________________________________

From the Sino-Russian Joint Statement of April 23, 1997:
"The two sides [China and Russia] shall, in the spirit of partnership, strive to promote the multipolarization of the world and the establishment of a new international order."
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/HI29Ag01.html
_____________________________________________________________

"As a globalist, [Bill] Clinton promotes "multipolarity" – the doctrine that no country (such as the USA) should be allowed to gain decisive advantage over others."

From a 2003 Washington Post article:

"...a statement [Bill] Clinton made in February 2002, in which he told an audience in Australia, 'This is a unique moment in U.S. history, a brief moment in history, when the U.S. has preeminent military, economic and political power. It won't last forever. This is just a period, a few decades this will last.'

Clinton continued...

'In all probability, we won't be the premier political and economic power we are now' in a few decades, he said, pointing to the growth of China's economy and the growing economic strength of the European Union.

Whether the United States maintains its military supremacy, he said, depends in part on how much those other entities invest in their militaries, and Clinton said working cooperatively is essential to U.S. interests.

But he said he did not want to be misunderstood. 'I never advocated that we not have the strongest military in the world...I don't think a single soul has thought I was advocating scaling back our military.'

Source: Washington Post article from May 2003:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A62253-2003Apr30&notFound=true

or find his remarks here (Talon News):
Clinton Predicts America's Decline:
http://mensnewsdaily.com/archive/newswire/nw03/talonnews/0503/newswire-tn-050503d.htm

32 posted on 12/18/2013 5:17:37 AM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea

Bump


33 posted on 12/18/2013 5:33:05 AM PST by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL
I read it on the internet...
34 posted on 12/18/2013 5:58:02 AM PST by logi_cal869
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

You read what on the internet?


35 posted on 12/18/2013 6:06:29 AM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Not I; you. That was the message I took from your comment.

You know, we fought this little 5-decade conflict called The Cold War partly because the government led everyone to believe we were behind the Russians to bone up the military.

Then came 9/11 and The Patriot Act, etc, etc.

Pardon if I’m a ‘doubting-Thomas’ when it comes to supposed projections of military threat from China when our neighbors continue to vote in a$$hats that pile on increasingly totalitarian/authoritarian rule and both parties are working together to maintain largesse.

You want an enemy? Open your window blinds, look at your neighbors and look east (but turn around and look west when you hit salt water).


36 posted on 12/18/2013 6:37:29 AM PST by logi_cal869
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ETL

That’s not a picture of a REAL mushroom cloud over Europe, but it could be, unless you running dog capitalists deliver to the People’s Army ONE MEEELYUN DOLLARS!


37 posted on 12/18/2013 6:41:36 AM PST by thanatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

On what basis did you name yourself “logi-cal, as in LOGIGAL? Because you can’t seem to even put 2 and 2 together.


38 posted on 12/18/2013 6:42:09 AM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

You doubt that that image wasn’t carefully reviewed by higher ups in the ChiCom government? And you, in your “logical” little mind, actually think no one in this group noticed the nuke cloud??


39 posted on 12/18/2013 6:46:15 AM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I am sorry to say but with our current doofus we are all doomed.


40 posted on 12/18/2013 7:41:08 AM PST by MistrX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL

“Defense contractors eager to sell technology to China poured millions of dollars into Clinton’s campaign. In return, Clinton called off the dogs.”

So it’s really these greedy corporation’s fault.


41 posted on 12/18/2013 8:20:06 AM PST by Rennes Templar (If you like your disease, you can keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

A lot of people are to blame for what happened. The treasonous dems on the panels who acted as his defense team, too. Lucky for him, perhaps, is that the Monica Lewinsky scandal broke at the same time. It may be what got him off the hook.


42 posted on 12/18/2013 8:33:38 AM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ETL

For that matter, he may have set up the scandal.


43 posted on 12/18/2013 9:05:48 AM PST by Rennes Templar (If you like your disease, you can keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

Quite possibly.


44 posted on 12/18/2013 9:10:00 AM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

Need to rotate the picture 90 CCW


45 posted on 12/18/2013 10:17:48 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

POGO was RIGHT!!


46 posted on 12/18/2013 10:19:01 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ETL
Because you can’t seem to even put 2 and 2 together.

Perhaps he does better at spellin'

47 posted on 12/18/2013 10:19:48 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Anyone who has read Robert Heinlein’s “The Moon is a Harsh Mistress” understand that the moon is the ultimate High Ground to fight from.


48 posted on 12/18/2013 10:26:42 AM PST by zeugma (Is it evil of me to teach my bird to say "here kitty, kitty"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Easier to beat a sex scandal than treason.


49 posted on 12/18/2013 11:00:52 AM PST by Rennes Templar (If you like your disease, you can keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Lol. That was an obvious typo on my part, if that’s what you’re referring to. I know how to spell “logical”.


50 posted on 12/18/2013 11:09:03 AM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson