Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: redgolum

Because Alexander Litvinenko was not a terrorist. At most, he was a common criminal, but perhaps not even that. What every he did, he did not deserve to be assassinated.


40 posted on 12/19/2013 9:16:45 AM PST by Parmenio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Parmenio
Friend, you are splitting hairs.

Both acts were assassinations. Litvinenko was more than a common criminal. Less (maybe) than the guy in Yemen, but he was tied to a group that was funding Russia's terrorists in Chechnya.

41 posted on 12/19/2013 10:52:16 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson