Skip to comments.Duck flap: Truth is 'hate' to those who hate Truth
Posted on 12/21/2013 7:52:35 AM PST by jimluke01
As widely reported, Phil Robertson, the patriarch in A&Es breakaway hit Duck Dynasty, recently ran a-fowl of homosexual pressure groups, ruffling progressive feathers throughout concentrated pockets of deep blue America. He remains suspended indefinitely for candidly summarizing, in a recent interview with GQ Magazine, the millennia-long Love the sinner, hate the sin biblical stance on homosexual practice.
It seems like, to me, a vagina as a man would be more desirable than a mans anus. Thats just me, he bluntly opined. Im just thinking: Theres more there! Shes got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes!
Dudes worldwide save self-styled gays, Pajama Boy and a few liberal men actually rumored to be heterosexual responded: Eww! I know, right.
You know what Im saying? continued Robertson. But hey, sin: Its not logical, my man. Its just not logical, he noted.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Truth is ‘hate’ to those who hate Truth.
This only makes sense. Isn’t there a saying that goes something like: To make a conservative mad, tell him a lie, to make a liberal mad, tell him the truth?
In my personal experiences with libtards, the telling of facts really brings out their negative emotions.
Stolen for tag line...
>>Dudes worldwide save self-styled gays, Pajama Boy and a few liberal men actually rumored to be heterosexual responded: Eww! I know, right.
That is the real reason for the Progressive Outrage(tm). They have made a lot of headway in recent years trying to convince normal people that homosexuality is normal and cool. Then, along comes Phil Robertson who reminds the nation that gay sex is anal sex, and suddenly a lot of young liberal men push back in disgust.
The Truth shall set you free!
Amen, Phil! Rock on!
First axciom of The Conservatives Bible that the Left hates. The truth is the truth no matter what you say. Of that there is no debate.
I told hubby that yesterday.
The real “outrage” isn’t about homos being “sinful”, it was their fear of a collective gag reflex backlash over the cornhole comment.
They really don’t want people *thinking* about ‘what they do in the privacy of their own homes’.
This is note the ‘cute’ TV stereotypes of prissy, very clever gay guys who decorate everything in sight yet never actually physically demonstrate what homosexuality is truly about.
This is ~real~.
They hate that.
>>They really dont want people *thinking* about what they do in the privacy of their own homes.
Exactly! I’m proud of Robertson for shining light on that truth. People say that what he said was crude and disgusting, but it’s the ACT that is crude and disgusting.
“They really dont want people *thinking* about what they do in the privacy of their own homes.”
I could do without that as well actually.
Real men tell it like it is. I admire Phil for giving a real accurate answer to the sick excuse of a Magazine called GQ. Garbage on the earth can’t stand truth.
It really destroys the “charming” image they’ve worked so hard to create.
It nauseates me, as I’m sure it did a *lot* of people.
There’s a graphic going around FB with “Phil likes the pink, not the stink!”.
Gross but true.
>>Theres a graphic going around FB with Phil likes the pink, not the stink!.
I remember when someone told me that “Sheldon” was a real life homo.
I have a very hard time enjoying The Big Bang Theory like I once did.
Just can’t get that image out of my mind.
I just reformatted this laptop and have hardly any of my stuff back on it yet but I’ll try and find it for you.
It was on one of the brand new I Support Phil FB pages, buried in the *millions* of posts/likes that happened in _one night_.
I get the feeling that they’ve overplayed their hand, this time.
People are downright fierce about defending the Robertsons.
Indeed, the homos have done their best to sell their depraved lifestyle as nothing more than cheery, well-dressed dudes who style hair and hang curtains. Everything but the grossness and disease-ridden sickness of their sexual practices.
Yep, no talk about things like how after so many years of ripping their colons to shreds, they lose their ability to control their bowels, constantly reeking of feces. I don’t suppose there was a “Glee” episode covering this.
“Dancing with Ducks!”
by Wild Bill for America
Two people on FOX were debating this controversy. The pro-gay guy was saying that Phil had compared homosexuality to bestiality. He said that Robertson then said something so vile and disgusting it couldn’t be repeated on TV. So in essence he was saying describing the homosexual act is vile and disgusting and not suitable for TV? I agree but I’m not trying to defend the practice.
Brilliant, and true.
What really got the gays in a rage were the references to the anal sex they engage in plus mentioning bestiality along with gay anal sex. I say too bad for you!!! The truth hurts!!>>>>
“Start with homosexual behavior and just morph out from there,” he says. “Bestiality, sleeping around with this woman and that woman and that woman and those men.”
He goes on to paraphrase Corinthians: “Don’t be deceived. Neither the adulterers, the idolaters, the male prostitutes, the homosexual offenders, the greedy, the drunkards, the slanderers, the swindlers — they won’t inherit the kingdom of God. Don’t deceive yourself. It’s not right.”
***it was their fear of a collective gag reflex backlash over the cornhole comment.***
IF you really want to exercise your gag reflex, google “Homosexual scat” . I accidentally found that page years ago and have never been back.
Personal thought, google it, look at the web page titles, but DON’T GO THERE!.
I’m curious. Have any of the people who are down on Phil claimed that the anus is better than the vagina, and explained how and why?
I mean, they claim it’s normal and to be celebrated and all that.
I think there have been...
“The real outrage isnt about homos being sinful, it was their fear of a collective gag reflex backlash over the cornhole comment.
They really dont want people *thinking* about what they do in the privacy of their own homes.”
Honestly, if someone told me they had a gag reflex just from thinking about what I might be doing in the privacy of my own home, I probably wouldn’t respond positively.
I do have one question based upon your commentary:
You say that homosexuality is a sin like any other sexual act committed outside of a one man, one-woman marriage.
Yet it raises a question in light of your Mormondom:
When your spiritual ancestors engaged in 19th & 20th century polygamy, were they, too committing such sinful sexual acts?
And, if so, have you ever weighed in against them?
If not, why not?
First time I’ve read Phil Robertson mentioned other sins, instead of he compared it to other sins, I.e. beastiality.
Now, gotta finish reading.
Incredibly impressive. What kind of articles does Crisis normally post?
Excuse me. WND. Too many windows open.
My ex used to hide homo/”anal” porn around the house and I’d find it.
I have no curiosity left, having seen far more than I wanted to, to begin with.
“Love the sinner, hate the sin.”
I can’t find this verse in the Bible.
God casts the unbelieving sinner into hell. Those who believe not the son shall not see life, but the wrath of God abides (present tense) on him. (John 3:36). The wrath of God abides (dwells) on him right now. And when the unbeliever dies, he goes immediately into hell, a place of eternal fire and torment.
God sent his only begotten Son into the world to draw the sinner to belief. And to as many as receive him to these he gives the power to becomes sons of God, to those who believe on his name.
But there are some who God rejects outright. They are beyond salvation. Those who attribute the work of the holy spirit to demons have committed an unpardonable sin (Mark 3:29). Those who take the mark of the beast (Revelation 20:4) and those who add to or take away from the words of the revelation of Jesus Christ (Revelation 21:18,19), all these are damned .
In Romans 1 the Holy Spirit speaking through Paul reveals that the sodomite who rejects God is given over by God to a reprobate mind. These are the reprobate (rejected). If they are rejected by God, and it is God who does the drawing, what does that say about the possibility of subsequent conversion of the reprobate? Not possible.
In Chronicles 19:2 Jehu asks Jehosaphat “Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the LORD? Therefore is wrath upon thee from before the LORD.” The answer: No, we should not love them that hate the LORD. Love some sinners, not those who hate the LORD.