Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Special Report: The U.S. government lab behind China's nuclear power push
reuters ^ | Fri Dec 20, 2013 9:20am EST | David Lague and Charlie Zhu

Posted on 12/22/2013 4:15:25 PM PST by ckilmer

Scientists in Shanghai are attempting a breakthrough in nuclear energy: reactors powered by thorium, an alternative to uranium.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: china; chinathorium; fission; lftr; thorium; thoriumreactor

Special Report: The U.S. government lab behind China's nuclear power push

 

HONG KONG Fri Dec 20, 2013 9:20am EST

 

 
Part of a Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment is seen in this undated handout. REUTERS-Courtesy of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managed for the U.S. Department of Energy by UT-Battelle, LLC-Handout via Reuters
A fuel rig with rods installed is seen at the OECD Halden Research Reactor facility in Halden in this undated handout. REUTERS-Torbjorn Tandberg-Thor Energy-Handout via Reuters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
A general view of a building of Tokyo Electric Power Company's (TEPCO) tsunami-crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant is seen from a bus during a media tour at the plant in Fukushima prefecture in this June 12, 2013 file photo. REUTERS-Noboru Hashimoto-Pool-Files

1 of 10. Part of a Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment is seen in this undated handout.

Credit: Reuters/Courtesy of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managed for the U.S. Department of Energy by UT-Battelle, LLC/Handout via Reuters

 

 

(Reuters) - Scientists in Shanghai are attempting a breakthrough in nuclear energy: reactors powered by thorium, an alternative to uranium.

The project is run by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, a government body with close military ties that coordinates the country's science-and-technology strategy. The academy has designated thorium as a priority for China's top laboratories. The program has a budget of $350 million. And it's being spearheaded by the influential son of a former Chinese president.

But even as China bulks up its military muscle through means ranging from espionage to heavy spending, it is pursuing this aspect of its technology game plan with the blessing - and the help - of the United States.

China has enlisted a storied partner for its thorium push: Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The U.S. government institute produced the plutonium used for the Manhattan Project and laid important groundwork for the commercial and military use of nuclear power.

The Tennessee lab, as it happens, helped pioneer thorium reactors. The Pentagon and the energy industry later sidelined this technology in favor of uranium. The Chinese are now enthusiastically tapping that know-how, in an example of how the rising Asian superpower is scouring the world for all sorts of technology needed to catch up to America in a broad array of scientific fields.

Thorium's chief allure is that it is a potentially far safer fuel for civilian power plants than is uranium. But the element also has possible military applications as an energy source in naval vessels. A U.S. congressman unsuccessfully sought to push the Pentagon to embrace the technology in 2009, and British naval officers are recommending a design for a thorium-fueled ship.

In a further twist, despite the mounting strategic rivalry with China, there has been little or no protest in the United States over Oak Ridge's nuclear-energy cooperation with China.

"The U.S. government seems to welcome Chinese scientists into Department of Energy labs with open arms," says physicist and thorium advocate Robert Hargraves. He and other experts note that most of the U.S. intellectual property related to thorium is already in the public domain. At a time when the U.S. government is spending very little on advanced reactor research, they believe China's experiments may yield a breakthrough that provides an alternative to the massive consumption of fossil fuels.

The technology's immediate appeal for China, both Chinese and American scientists say, is that thorium reactors have the potential to be much more efficient, safer and cleaner than most in service today.

The Chinese plan to cool their experimental reactors with molten salts. This is sharply different from the pressurized water-cooling systems used in most uranium-fueled nuclear plants. The risks of explosions and meltdowns are lower, proponents say.

"If a thorium, molten-salt reactor can be successfully developed, it will remove all fears about nuclear energy," says Fang Jinqing, a retired nuclear researcher at the China Institute of Atomic Energy. "The technology works in theory, and it may have the potential to reshape the nuclear power landscape, but there are a lot of technical challenges."

Other advocates agree on thorium's peaceful promise. Republican Senator Orrin Hatch and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat, introduced legislation in 2010 calling on the U.S. government to share its thorium expertise.

The unsuccessful bill said it was in U.S. "national security and foreign policy interest" to provide other countries with thorium fuel-cycle technology, because doing so would produce less long-lasting waste and reduce the risk of nuclear proliferation.

Oak Ridge has been free to proceed in spite of that bill's failure.

TURNING BACK THE CLOCK

What China is attempting is to turn the nuclear clock back to the mid-1960s, when Oak Ridge successfully operated a reactor with fuel derived from thorium and cooled with molten salts. The lab also produced detailed plans for a commercial-scale power plant.

Despite considerable promise, the thorium test reactor was shut down in 1969 after about five years of operation. Research was effectively shelved when the Nixon Administration decided in the 1970s that the U.S. nuclear industry would concentrate on a new generation of uranium-fueled, fast-breeder reactors. For a range of technical and political reasons, not least the public's fear of nuclear plants, these new uranium reactors have yet to come into widespread commercial use.

The die was cast against thorium much earlier. In the early 1950s, an influential U.S. Navy officer, Hyman Rickover, decided a water-cooled, uranium-fueled reactor would power the world's first nuclear submarine, the USS Nautilus. Rickover was instrumental in the 1957 commissioning of a similar reactor at Shippingport, Pennsylvania - the world's first nuclear-power station.

Admiral Rickover was a towering figure in atomic energy and became known as the father of the U.S. nuclear navy. He had clear reasons for his choice, engineers say. The pressurized water reactor was the most advanced, compact and technically sound at the time. More importantly, these reactors also supplied plutonium as a byproduct - then in strong demand as fuel for America's rapidly growing arsenal of nuclear warheads.

"The short answer is that uranium was good for bombs and thorium wasn't," says Kirk Sorensen, president of Flibe Energy, a privately held thorium-technology start-up based in Huntsville, Alabama.

With the launch of the Nautilus in 1955, a course was set that is still followed today, with most of the world's nuclear power generated from this type of reactor.

Although it does not yield byproducts that can be readily used to make weapons, thorium does have military applications.

The fuel could be used to power Chinese navy surface warships, including a planned fleet of aircraft carriers. China's nuclear submarine fleet has struggled with reactor reliability and safety, according to naval commentators, and thorium could eventually become an alternative.

Top British naval engineers last year proposed a design for a thorium reactor to power warships. Compact thorium power plants could also be used to supply reliable power to military bases and expeditionary forces.

Thorium also has military potential for the United States, experts say. But the world's most powerful military is reluctant to pursue alternatives to its uranium-fueled reactors, because it has operated them successfully for almost six decades.

Joe Sestak, a former U.S. congressman and retired two-star admiral, failed in an effort to get the Pentagon to reconsider thorium in 2009. "It is very hard to effect a change in something that has been established for a long time," he says. Sestak says he was unaware of the extent of cooperation between the U.S. and China on thorium technology.

INTELLECTUAL HOME

Flibe Energy's Sorensen, a former NASA engineer, has plans to build thorium-fueled reactors for commercial use in the United States. Sorensen has been instrumental in reviving global interest in the groundbreaking work of the late American nuclear physicist Alvin Weinberg.

It was Weinberg who led research into molten-salt cooled reactors and thorium when he ran Oak Ridge from 1955 to 1973. Weinberg was eventually fired for his persistent thorium advocacy. But he had some powerful supporters. In his last scientific paper, published shortly after his death in 2003, nuclear-weapons pioneer Edward Teller called for the construction and testing of a small, thorium-fueled reactor.

Oak Ridge remains the intellectual home of this technology. The U.S. Department of Energy lab still has a small research project under way on the use of molten-salt coolants for uranium-fueled reactors. The Energy Department is also funding related research at the University of California, Berkeley, the University of Wisconsin and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

But the ambitious project under way in China could be the best bet to unlock thorium's promise of safe, cheap and abundant nuclear fuel.

Jiang Mianheng, son of former Chinese president Jiang Zemin, visited Oak Ridge in 2010 and brokered a cooperation agreement with the lab. The deal gave the Chinese Academy of Sciences, which has a staff of 50,000, the plans for a thorium reactor. In January 2011, Jiang signed a protocol with the Department of Energy outlining the terms of joint energy research with the academy.

An electrical engineer trained at Drexel University in Philadelphia, Jiang told a conference on thorium in Shanghai last year China's thorium project "is 100 percent financed by the central government."

The protocol stipulates that intellectual property arising from the joint research will be shared with the global scientific community. It excludes sharing commercially confidential information and any other material that the parties agree to withhold. The pact also specifically rules out any military or weapons-related research. "All activities conducted under this protocol shall be exclusively for peaceful purposes," it says.

Jess Gehin, a nuclear-reactor physicist at Oak Ridge, says the pact allows the two sides to share information about their research.

"The Chinese are very aggressive, very determined and programmed to move forward with this technology," Gehin said. "Right now we agree that we should meet routinely, maybe a couple of times a year."

Jiang did not respond to requests for comment. In a statement posted on the Chinese Academy of Sciences website, he said China and the United States "should boost mutual trust and carry out complementary and mutually beneficial cooperation in the study of thorium-based salt reactors, hybrid energy systems and other cutting edge science and technology."

AN ENERGY HEDGE

Beijing's long-term goal: commercialize the technology by 2040, after building a series of increasingly bigger reactors. The Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics is recruiting nuclear physicists, engineers, project managers and support staff, according to a regular stream of job advertisements it publishes online. Its team is expected to expand to 750 by 2015 and eventually include 1,000 researchers.

A director at the Shanghai Institute, Li Qingnuan, and other senior researchers are wooing top young talent across China to join the project. After lecturing on molten-salt reactor technology at Sichuan University in April, Li invited students from the audience to apply for positions at the institute, according to a report on the university's website.

China's sprawling network of nuclear-research and industrial companies are gearing up to assist. In early June, the China National Nuclear Corporation, the body overseeing all Chinese civilian and military nuclear programs, announced that state-owned China North Nuclear Fuel Company had signed an agreement with the Shanghai Institute to research and supply thorium and molten salts for the experimental reactors.

The push into thorium is part of a broader national energy strategy. The government wants to reduce its dependence on coal-fired power plants, which account for about 80 percent of the nation's electricity but have darkened its skies. Nuclear energy is a big part of the plan: China aims to have 58 gigawatts of nuclear power on the grid by 2020, an almost five-fold increase from 12.57 gigawatts today.

Thorium is a hedge on that nuclear bet. China has 15 conventional nuclear reactors online and 30 under construction. But energy authorities are also investing in a range of different technologies for the future, including advanced pressurized water reactors, fast-breeder reactors and pebble-bed reactors. China has little uranium but massive reserves of thorium. So, the prospect of cheaper nuclear power with secure supplies of fuel is a powerful attraction.

At last year's Shanghai thorium conference, Jiang described how clean nuclear power would allow China to make a "revolutionary" move towards a greener economy.

The bet on unconventional nukes, he said, explains "why China is the first one to eat a crab" - citing an old Chinese proverb about the individual who dares to make a discovery important to civilization.

1 posted on 12/22/2013 4:15:25 PM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Much as I’d rather not help the Chinese, thorium is good for everyone. Why it’s not a priority here is beyond me.


2 posted on 12/22/2013 4:21:36 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Let me guess, the world’s Thorium deposits are either on lands acquired by China, or in the U.S., but guarded by endangered species, whom no one has ever seen.


3 posted on 12/22/2013 4:23:31 PM PST by jmcenanly ("The more corrupt the state, the more laws." Tacitus, Publius Cornelius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

I would be so much happier if we were partnering with Japan on this research. Unfortunately, we need to always consider China our future enemy, based on their behavior.


4 posted on 12/22/2013 4:24:43 PM PST by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catbertz

Why “future enemy” when they regard us as their present (and number-one) enemy?


5 posted on 12/22/2013 4:26:41 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jmcenanly

Let me guess, the world’s Thorium deposits are either on lands acquired by China, or in the U.S., but guarded by endangered species, whom no one has ever seen.
............
there are 1000’s of years worth of thorium deposits in the USA China, India Australia and elsewhere. There’s also plenty of thorium on the moon and mars.


6 posted on 12/22/2013 4:35:36 PM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
Already done in Oak Ridge


7 posted on 12/22/2013 4:35:55 PM PST by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catbertz; Olog-hai

Well its actually the chinese military the PLA on land and PLAN on sea. PLAN is especially ambitious. About like the Japanese navy at the beginning of the 20th century.

If they score victories, they’ll become more ambitious.


8 posted on 12/22/2013 4:37:38 PM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

9 posted on 12/22/2013 4:38:00 PM PST by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

Yeah in the late 60’s for about 4 years.


10 posted on 12/22/2013 4:38:18 PM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Amen. As long as we’re to stupid, wimpy, or PC to support this research in the US, I’m glad it is at least being done somewhere. Thorium has great potential and hey, it’ll give us a reason to keep doing bidness with Our Good ChiCom Friends.


11 posted on 12/22/2013 4:48:14 PM PST by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jmcenanly

12 posted on 12/22/2013 4:49:47 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; me = independent conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

The Molten Salt Reactor, yes, but then we dropped it. Dumb.


13 posted on 12/22/2013 4:50:16 PM PST by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jmcenanly

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorium

The Lemhi Pass, along the Idaho-Montana border, has one of the world’s largest known high quality thorium deposits. Thorium Energy, Inc. has the mineral rights to approximately 1360 acres (5.5 sq km) of it and states that they have proven thorium oxide reserves of 600 thousand tons and probable reserves of an additional 1.8 million tons within their claim.


14 posted on 12/22/2013 4:52:24 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; me = independent conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

We should definitely treat them as such. I’d call them our current primary long term threat, though not sure whether Russia still takes first spot. Once they take that first shot, they will be our bonifide enemy.


15 posted on 12/22/2013 5:03:58 PM PST by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

thanks ckilmer, additional:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3104463/posts


16 posted on 12/22/2013 5:06:40 PM PST by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bigbob
The Molten Salt Reactor, yes, but then we dropped it. Dumb.

but but but thorium reactors don't produce fissile materials for atom bombs!

17 posted on 12/22/2013 5:08:04 PM PST by null and void (I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

BFL


18 posted on 12/22/2013 5:13:26 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
From Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorium-based_nuclear_power

China

At the 2011 annual conference of the Chinese Academy of Sciences it was announced that "China has initiated a research and development project in thorium molten-salt reactor technology."[35] In addition, Dr. Jiang Mianheng, son of China's former leader Jiang Zemin, led a thorium delegation in non-disclosure talks at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, and by late 2013 China had officially partnered with Oak Ridge to aid China in its own development.[36][37] The World Nuclear Association notes that the China Academy of Sciences in January 2011 announced its R&D program, "claiming to have the world's largest national effort on it, hoping to obtain full intellectual property rights on the technology"[17] According to Martin, "China has made clear its intention to go it alone," adding that China already has a monopoly over most of the world's rare earth minerals.[15]:157[19]

In early 2012, it was reported that China, using components produced by the West and Russia, planned to build two prototype thorium molten salt reactors by 2015, and had budgeted the project at $400 million and requiring 400 workers."[15]:157 China also finalized an agreement with a Canadian nuclear technology company to develop improved CANDU reactors using thorium and uranium as a fuel.[38]

19 posted on 12/22/2013 6:03:08 PM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

I’m not going to read the article (SEEING RED just reading headline).


20 posted on 12/22/2013 10:03:52 PM PST by logi_cal869
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson