Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do Democratic Lawmakers anticipate Treason Trials?
Canada Free Press ^ | 12-21-2013 | Eric Rush

Posted on 12/23/2013 8:42:37 AM PST by Dracomeister

According to a report by Breitbart’s Elizabeth Sheld, eight Democrat lawmakers have proposed a bill that would eliminate the death penalty as a consequence for individuals convicted of numerous federal crimes, among them espionage and treason. Nothing happens in Washington without a reason, so The Federal Death Penalty Abolition Act (HR 3741) gives rise to a bevy of questions and suspicions.

What motivation would congressional Democrats have for wishing to neutralize the death penalty option for such serious crimes? While the average news consumer is conditioned to summarily dismiss the machinations of government unless it directly impacts their pocketbook, or their sensibilities are deliberately targeted by the press, common sense dictates that elected officials proposing such a law could be anticipating the requisite conditions, thus necessitating the law in the first place. So, who do these lawmakers suppose might be tried for treason, espionage, or the host of other federal crimes now punishable by death in the not-so-distant future? Well, take your pick. President Obama himself committed a treasonable offense in supplying military aid to rebels fighting against the Assad regime in Syria, first clandestinely and then overtly after circumventing laws expressly prohibiting same. What other treasonable offenses he may have committed attendant to this process (including those related to the 9/11/12 attack on the Benghazi compound) remains to be seen.

Obama’s insinuation of Muslim Brotherhood operatives into sensitive government positions, as well as actions pursuant to his relationship with them are likely treasonable offenses. Despite the Muslim Brotherhood’s intended goal in subjugating America and the rest of the globe, the only reason that this has not been an issue of contention is because Obama and his surrogates themselves do not wish it to be, the press has been complicit, and the Republican leadership are invertebrates. Then, there are the recent reports coming out of the Middle East as represented by former Muslim Brotherhood member Walid Shoebat. According to Naglaa Mahmoud, wife of Egypt’s ousted President Mohammed Morsi and Muslim Sisterhood operative, Bill and Hillary Clinton (with an emphasis on Hillary) have been deeply involved with the Brotherhood since the 1980s. Mahmoud has been implicated in Egypt in anti-government operations dedicated to returning her husband to power; he remains in Egyptian custody. Mahmoud recently appeared on Turkish television network Mehwar TV and alleged that the Clintons recruited her and her husband in the 1980s toward the end of advancing everything from “Green” initiatives in the West to the ascendancy of the Muslim Brotherhood in the Middle East. Hillary Clinton’s “Girl Friday” just happens to be Huma Abedin (her Deputy Chief of Staff when she was Secretary of State), whose mother is a colleague of Mahmoud’s and a long-time leader in the Muslim Sisterhood. Oddly enough, one of the few topics that Mahmoud refuses to discuss is Abedin. According to Shoebat, “In December of 2011, Abedin went on maternity leave. She returned in June of that year while simultaneously taking a job a Special Government Employee (SGE). In addition to her role their being quite ambiguous, questions about the legality of the arrangement caught the eye of Senator Charles Grassley, who sent Secretary of State John Kerry a letter demanding answers.” What was Abedin doing? Who knows, but some of the activities in which Mahmoud alleges the Muslim Brotherhood and the Clintons were involved most certainly do not reflect a primary concern for the security of the United States. Were they treasonable? Only an extensive investigation might reveal that, but these allegations proffer that the Clintons’ relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood predates Bill becoming Governor of Arkansas. Then, we have the body counts. Recently, Larry Nichols, a former Clinton operative, almost casually admitted to having murdered for the Clintons on a regular basis, whether it was low-level political opponents, or “weak link” confidants who held information that might compromise their power. The lengthy list of individuals whose suspicious deaths directly benefitted Barack Obama began even before he received the Democratic nomination. Most recently of course, Hawaii State Health Director Loretta Fuddy was killed when the small plane carrying her and eight other people crashed into the ocean off the Hawaiian island of Molokai. The only fatality, she is the individual who certified (I use the term loosely) President Obama’s long-form birth certificate. The circumstances and accounts of her demise are respectively, sketchy and conflicting at best. It is well-known that Obama’s close associates include members of the Weather Underground, whose stated mission was overthrowing the American government. For his entire life, he has been surrounded by radicals, embittered, America-hating anti-colonialists, black nationalists, and avowed communists – yet this has never entered into the area of popular discussion, even in the face of the myriad policies, orders, and actions the President brought about which have directly compromised America’s economy, national security, and domestic tranquility. Obama’s origins narrative of course remains unresolved. This week for the first time, a mainstream publication supported the voracity of evidence that the President perpetrated a fraud with the forged long-form birth certificate released by the White House in April 2011. It is a little-known fact that the submission of fraudulent documents toward attaining public office on the federal level remains an executable offense under the law. It is possible that we not only have a pathologically unethical oligarchy in perpetual residence in our government, but various Mafia-like “families” sharing and trading off power, operating as they see fit, and compromising this nation in ways most Americans cannot yet imagine. If so, the perpetrators must shudder to think of what an independent prosecutor or commission with no political allegiances might make of their activities over the last couple of decades. So, congressional Democrats sponsoring HR 3741 might have been persuaded to do so by influential parties who fear that they may at some point be charged with espionage or treason. On the other hand, they might be acting independently, in the anticipation of other prominent Democrats being so charged. Perhaps some may even have purposed to facilitate such charges being leveled, knowing how toxic certain individuals have become to the party. In such a case, they may be trying to spare their lives, as well as facilitating easier convictions. Some might rather not have the blood of colleagues on their hands, but perceive the imperative of removing people who have become dangers to the Democrat Party, as well as traitors to the United States.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; naturalborncitizen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 12/23/2013 8:42:37 AM PST by Dracomeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dracomeister

looksinterestingbutiamnotsureihavetimetoreaditrightnow


2 posted on 12/23/2013 8:45:58 AM PST by j_guru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dracomeister

Bad formatting, bad link.


3 posted on 12/23/2013 8:45:59 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Who knew that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional journalism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dracomeister
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/60018
4 posted on 12/23/2013 8:47:21 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Who knew that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional journalism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dracomeister

The democrat party of today would hardly exist if we had treason trials when they were called for. Of course the demonRats are opposed to them.


5 posted on 12/23/2013 8:48:19 AM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dracomeister

“What motivation would congressional Democrats have for wishing to neutralize the death penalty option for such serious crimes? “

That should be obvious. The democrat party, like its fearless leader, has nothing against anyone who betrays this country.


6 posted on 12/23/2013 8:48:34 AM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dracomeister
Paragraphs (< p>) are your FRiend.

5.56mm

7 posted on 12/23/2013 8:49:16 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dracomeister

Pushing through the ACA without giving anyone time to read it firs qualifies as treason in my book.


8 posted on 12/23/2013 8:50:16 AM PST by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dracomeister

Nothing happens in Washington without a reason
Because they removed the death row for treason

There, I made it rhyme....


9 posted on 12/23/2013 8:52:09 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

>>Bad formatting, bad link.

Unless it was changed, the link worked for me.

Could have used a few paragraph breaks though.


10 posted on 12/23/2013 8:52:24 AM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2

Pushing through the ACA without giving anyone time to read it firs qualifies as treason in my book.

Selective re-editing of the ACA act by the executive branch is treason as well...

So is the non-enforcement of immigration laws and border security, the selective enforceemnt of laws, the abdication of the law via illegal treaties and arrangements with the UN...

I could go on and on....


11 posted on 12/23/2013 8:54:32 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ETL

It’s been fixed. It was bad.


12 posted on 12/23/2013 8:54:36 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Who knew that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional journalism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dracomeister

This, combined with Dirty Harry’s nuclear warfare in the Senate to get judges in place quickly.


13 posted on 12/23/2013 8:55:19 AM PST by CPO retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dracomeister

I can see treason trials following the removal of this rotten bastard from office along with his evil henchmen.

But I doubt the death penalty would be the result.


14 posted on 12/23/2013 8:58:55 AM PST by ZULU (Impeach that Bastard Barrack Hussein Obama the Doctor Mengele of Medical Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dracomeister

It may also be a way od luring Snowden back!


15 posted on 12/23/2013 8:59:39 AM PST by mdmathis6 (Secret Societies are like Sasquatch, you never catch one but they do leave footprints!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

“Nothing happens in Washington without a reason
Because they removed the death row for treason

There, I made it rhyme....”

just in time..,(wait for it)

FOR THE HOLIDAY SEASON!


16 posted on 12/23/2013 9:02:02 AM PST by mdmathis6 (Secret Societies are like Sasquatch, you never catch one but they do leave footprints!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dracomeister

Treason trials? Hah! Who would initiate them? A GOP afraid of its own shadow? We are in the midst of the biggest Constitutional Crisis this nation has faced since the Civil War and it refuses to lift a finger to do anything about it. We are no longer a nation of laws; we have overnight become a banana republic where whatever El Caudillo says is the law of the moment.


17 posted on 12/23/2013 9:04:14 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL
The democrat party of today would hardly exist if we had treason trials when they were called for.

The Republican party is not innocent either.
Take, for example, the War on Drugs; it's justification is the commerce-clause which lists the states at the same level as foreign nations. If the federal government were to assert the same control over the buying and selling in foreign nations as it claims in interstate- (and intrastate-… and non-) commerce it would be rightly seen as an act of war and forcing the enforcement thereof would be consequent of waging that war. So then, the War on Drugs is rightly seen as a war on the several states, which fits the Constitution's definition of treason.

18 posted on 12/23/2013 9:11:52 AM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dracomeister

“Do Democratic Lawmakers anticipate Treason Trials?”

You betcha——and with good reason!!!!


19 posted on 12/23/2013 9:13:05 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
E. Pluribus Unum :"... It’s been fixed. It was bad."

That's what Zero has been saying for the last 3 years !
Too bad he 'misppoke' 39 times in front of the press about keeping your healthcare , your doctor, or your "period" .
Benghazi was treason
Fast and Furious was treason ,for both the USSA and Mexico
IRS political supression of the Tea Party could be considered treason .. if you draw out the logical impact .
Irresponsible funding of international terrorists could be considered treasonous
Irresponsible running up the national debt into bankruptcy could be considered treasonous.
Gee .., I have no idea why Demorats would want to lesson the penalty of treason , .. do you ?
Maybe they are plannning some future heinious crime , like estabilshing a dictatorship .. !! Naw that can't happend here !!

20 posted on 12/23/2013 9:13:41 AM PST by Tilted Irish Kilt (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson