Pennsylvania woman tried to frame hubby with child porn

Fox News ^ | December 23, 2013 | Associated Press

[seacapn]

State police have charged a western Pennsylvania woman with putting child pornography on a computer in an unsuccessful effort to frame her estranged husband.

Online court records don't list an attorney for 42-year-old Meri Jane Woods, of Cherry Hill Township, who also doesn't have a listed phone.

[seacapn]

You have to wonder just how common this kind of thing is, especially in bitter divorce or breakup cases. The scary thing is that - had the police not done a proper investigation, and the guy had been charged - most people would be calling for him to be tortured to death by the other inmates.

[Mr. Jeeves]

Only the Feds are allowed to do that...

[AU72]

So she should have been charged with child porn.

[cuban leaf]

Things that make you go hmmm.

[Mr. K]

I had false charges filed against me - it is VERY common

Thank GOD I was able to prove I was not at home at the time (not only that, I was in my attorney’s office, on the phone setting up a court date with the judge- she screwed up royally)

But I found web sites on her computer dedicated to framing your husband. One had the title “So, now he’s in jail..; what’s next?”

[cuban leaf]

Any man in the middle of an ugly divorce who is charged with such activity needs to know this story is out there.

[Mrs. Don-o]

I've heard it's possible to put child porn into somebody else's computer remotely.

Does anybody know if that's true?

[cuban leaf]

So she should have been charged with child porn.

---

She was.

[cuban leaf]

So she should have been charged with child porn.

---

She was.

Felony posession.

[GeronL]

I bet the NSA can do that very easily

If you can get a virus, a trojan you can get compromised by a hacker this way too

[GeronL]

Yep, she should be charged.

[GeronL]

dang!!

[GeronL]

She was? That’s good then

[longtermmemmory]

pre-internet, the accusation was so universal that it was included in the generic forms.

[Forgotten Amendments]

You have to wonder just how common this kind of thing is, especially in bitter divorce or breakup cases.

Very. Especially in the '80s and early '90s. Some are still in jail. And prosecutors LOVE to nail people for child sex charges. Makes great press.

[RKBA Democrat]

“You have to wonder just how common this kind of thing is, especially in bitter divorce or breakup cases. “

And the funny part is that the majority of single women reading this will, within the hour, lament on the fact that there are so few men willing to commit to marriage.

In my view this all boils down to the inherent evils of state licensed marriage.

[Revolting cat!]

False charges by women against men are very common nowadays, especially in corporate environments, where men invariably lose.

[who knows what evil?]

I had false charges filed against me - it is VERY common

People filing false charges against ANYONE should have to pay the costs of the investigation AND serve MANDATORY jail time. Isn't providing false info to the police a felony in many areas?

[Gene Eric]

>> who also doesn’t have a listed phone.

I gather this pissed off the reporters that tried to call.

[Venturer]

Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned-—or one that is just a hateful spiteful POS.

The thing the most women are guilty of is corrupting the minds of their own children against the childs father.