Skip to comments.Obama and DC Bureaucrats Follow in the Steps of King George
Posted on 12/26/2013 7:17:49 AM PST by Kaslin
Right around eight a.m. in the morning, two hundred thirty seven years ago, George Washington and the Continental Army reached the outskirts of Trenton, New Jersey. Much like today, no-one wanted to go to New Jersey, but were forced by circumstances to make the arduous trek. Washingtons force of 2,400 men surprised, and ultimately defeated, the 1,400 Hessian mercenaries who were fighting on behalf of the British Crown. A much needed win was tallied under the Patriots side of the scoreboard, emboldening the Continental Army and our quest for freedom.
Washington had lead his men through the icy waters of the Delaware and into an unforgiving snow storm on the evening of Christmas in 1776. (Kinda makes your family Christmas yesterday look like a picnic Right?) The Hessians, who had greatly underestimated the Continental Armys capabilities, was unaware and still groggy from an evening of Christmas festivities. (Way to go George: Sneak up on those crafty Germans when theyre hung-over Churchill, take note.)
By the end of the battle at Trenton, four Americans had lost their lives. Over a thousand Hessians were captured. And while Washington was unable to hold onto the town (he had no artillery), the victory bore tremendous significance for the freedom of the colonies. In New Jersey, on December 26th in the year 1776, George Washington and his men cemented the concept of American exceptionalism and dedication to freedom.
The historical event is worth a few minutes of recollection as we trudge toward 2014 with an increasingly apparent devolution of freedom in America. After all, in the days of our founding, a simple tax on our breakfast beverage resulted in massive protests in Boston Harbor and ultimately a few gunshots. Our founders were tired of being ruled by a body of representatives hundreds of miles away. They were fed up with the dictatorial nature of King Georges executive action, and disregard for individual property rights. Imagine living in a land where one man in the executive branch could unilaterally alter law Its not that hard to imagine, is it?
Sure, King George never shoved universal healthcare down the throats of our Patriot founders; but he did enact taxes, regulation, and tariffs, with little more than a stroke of a pen. (No word, yet, on how often he decided to play golf.)
And while many things have changed since 1776 (although the governments inability to build a website has clearly remained unchanged in 200 plus years) there are many similarities in politics, societal concerns, and the struggle for liberty. The latter half of the 18th century saw some incredible shifts in how the world functioned, and how commerce commenced within the new world. As much as anything else, it was the changing times that propelled American patriots to a victory over the powerful British Empire.
The lesson should not be lost on ardent supporters of freedom in the 21st century. Freedom, and the cause of Liberty, will never be extinguished entirely, as is evidenced by Washingtons under-dog victory against a group of drunken mercenaries in New Jersey. And while freedoms may seem in jeopardy on a regular basis today, the sacrifices and tenacity of Washington and his men have allowed us to live in a world where freedom is no longer a farfetched concept. In fact, thanks to the ragged farmers and laborers who overthrew a hung-over force of Hessian mercenaries, we now live in a world where freedom and liberty are still experienced in relative abundance.
The bad news, on this anniversary of the battle of Trenton, is that many of us are still regulated and taxed by unaccountable officials a world away from where we live. Having bureaucrats in DC decide to regulate or tax based on other bureaucrats recommendations, after all, is not that different than the British Crown implementing law without the consent of the governed.
The good news, however, is that Americans still seem largely inclined toward rejecting centralized power, dictatorial governance, and ruling-class-elitism. Citizens of our great nation, for example, almost universally despise congress. Even liberals consider the label congressman to be a pejorative in most cases. While much of Obamas recent drop in public polls can be attributed to his outright lies on Obamacare, a sizeable portion of his PR problem is likely tied to his elitist (and unconstitutional) decision to unilaterally tinker with the law. (After all, what confidence can the American people place in government, when one man is capable of altering law without the consent of the governed?)
Of course, its also a bonus that making a trip to New Jersey is not a requisite to fighting for freedom on this December 27th.
You mean not King Louie 16?
King George III was a benign saint compared to what we’re stuck with today.
Around 90% of the people dislike congress. But, the majority of the people in each single district do like THEIR congressperson. And in some districts it’s 90%. So, a poll showing people dislike congress really doesn’t mean much. And that’s too bad. Forced term limits is the only solution.
This article reminds me of a scene and a line from the epic film, “The Patriot”, in which South Carolina’s colonial lesgislature was considering joining the Continental cause for Independence. They knew that doing so would bring war to their own neighborhoods and villages.
Someone quipped that it was intolerable for us to be governed by a tyrant 3000 miles away from us. Mel Gibson’s character (who at this point in the film opposed joining the Continental cause) replied, “Which is worse - dealing with one tyrant 3000 miles away, or dealing with 100 tyrants 300 miles away?” (in reference to the Continental Congress).
I think that’s what we now have - not just a tyrant in Obama, but 435 tyrants in the House and Senate, plus thousands of tyrants in all the governmental departments and bureaucracies, plus the tyranny of 9 people in black robes, plus the hundreds of other federal “judges” who with one stroke of the pen can nullify elections.
Which is worse - dealing with one tyrant 3000 miles away, or dealing with 100 tyrants 300 miles away? (in reference to the Continental Congress).
the original was said by a Loyalist..
he was asked about the tyrant King George..and why wasn’t he frightened of him..
The Loyalist replied that he was more concerned about the 3,000 tyrants only one mile away than the tyrant 3,000 miles away..
george III was also crazy so the comparisons continue.
That’s it! Thanks.
I think it is embarrassing that as a conservative you do not know that the total membership of Congress is 535 members. Congress is both Houses
Consider myself duly embarrassed. You’re correct, I should know better. My only defense was that I typed in a hurry. Not an excuse though.