Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bowl Championship Splendor: The golden age of college football
Weekly Standard ^ | December 23, 2013 | Jeffrey H. Anderson

Posted on 12/27/2013 12:03:57 PM PST by rhema

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: Cowboy Bob

Bowl Games are the College Football version of the NIT.


21 posted on 12/27/2013 12:42:15 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

That’s an unfortunate side effect, but more than ever, this needs to be settled on the field. I’m tired of the media (espn) telling us how it is. The ncaa should be steering this ship, but they acquiesce to the espn $$$.


22 posted on 12/27/2013 12:44:11 PM PST by FlJoePa ("Success without honor is an unseasoned dish; it will satisfy your hunger, but it won't taste good")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Apple Pan Dowdy; GizmosAndGadgets; NonValueAdded; del4hope; MamaB; LowOiL; Jemian; LBKQ; lysie; ...

Ping to the AU list!


23 posted on 12/27/2013 12:44:51 PM PST by Jemian (War Eagle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sean327; Admin Moderator

Mods generally do not give reasons. As I said, they sometimes respond to a courteous request. It helps to ping or PM them, though. As a service, I will ping a mod for you.


24 posted on 12/27/2013 12:45:06 PM PST by don-o (don-o loves Mrs. Don-o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sean327
Even a playoff wouldn't work, because the first time you have an NCAA football champion from the bottom 4-5 spots in a 16-team playoff you're going to have the same controversy about a team that just missed the 16-team playoffs that could credibly claim that they belonged there.

What most people seem to overlook is that football -- both college and professional -- is really incompatible with a playoff system no matter how hard these organizations try to pretend otherwise. The biggest problem with football is that the schedule is too short -- which means that the strength of a team's schedule will heavily influence its final record. This is why the SEC does so well in these BCS championship games. Even an SEC team with two losses can probably beat most other conference champions in any given year.

25 posted on 12/27/2013 12:51:40 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("I've never seen such a conclave of minstrels in my life.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sean327
. I stated my case for 16 team playoff that would consist of all 10 conference champs and 6 at large teams. I pointed out that this is the only way we will ever have a true National Champion in the FBS division.

When would these playoffs take place? Making room for a series of playoffs would mean that Division 1A football would have to end its regular season in mid-November, thereby reducing the number of games, or start in mid-August. Otherwise, the season would have to be extended well into January.

26 posted on 12/27/2013 12:55:13 PM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FlJoePa

Read your link — good stuff, thanks for posting that look back to the before-Genesis time for the BCS.


27 posted on 12/27/2013 12:56:43 PM PST by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FlJoePa; dfwgator

The bowl games have way too much power...and big name sponsors...even for smaller games. The book Death to the BCS really outlines how corrupt the bowls are


28 posted on 12/27/2013 12:57:16 PM PST by SeminoleCounty (Amnesty And Not Ending ObamaCare Will Kill GOP In 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeminoleCounty

The sad thing, schools are actually losing money sending their teams to bowls.


29 posted on 12/27/2013 12:58:10 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Win your conference and you get a spot, don’t win your conference and pray for an at large bid. Bottom line, win and your in.


30 posted on 12/27/2013 1:00:02 PM PST by sean327 (God created all men equal, then some become Marines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

That is why car washes and bake sales were invented


31 posted on 12/27/2013 1:00:15 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45

That game was certainly significant - for a number of reasons. Also the 1994 PSU team cemented the need for another system - arguably still the best offense to ever take the field, and yet they had to go to the Rose Bowl, while UNL went on to play an average Cane team in Miami.

Too bad the system they came up with has evolved into espn having all the control.


32 posted on 12/27/2013 1:01:39 PM PST by FlJoePa ("Success without honor is an unseasoned dish; it will satisfy your hunger, but it won't taste good")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sean327

And therein lies the problem. In any given year the third-best (or even fourth-best) SEC team is better than most of the other conference champions. How does a “win and you’re in” playoff system do any justice in that case?


33 posted on 12/27/2013 1:05:34 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("I've never seen such a conclave of minstrels in my life.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rhema

We must live in alternate universes. I LOATHE the BCS system & cannot wait for the 4 team playoff. Eight will be better.


34 posted on 12/27/2013 1:06:57 PM PST by Gulf War One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

One answer would be to automatically schedule two games during the season against quality non-conference opponents. Teams would be randomly selected.

Each team plays one of the two games at home and the other away, one game occurs early in the season, the other near the end of the season.

Teams are drawn against teams that finished at a similar level the previous season.

I think this could go a long way to removing the Conference Bias.


35 posted on 12/27/2013 1:08:43 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: FlJoePa
The 1994 PSU team got everything it deserved. Penn State was a perennial championship contender as an independent school because it always had the freedom to accept a bowl bid against a top-ranked conference champion in one of the major bowls. This is why independents like Penn State, Notre Dame and Miami had a disproportionate number of national titles back in the 1980s and early 1990s.

The only way they would be left out in the cold was if the Rose Bowl -- where both of the teams had automatic bids -- was played between two of the top-ranked teams in the country.

That all ended when Penn State joined the Big Ten -- which they did for purely financial reasons. So they end up as one of the top-ranked teams but were forced to play an Oregon team with three losses in the Rose Bowl. Too bad, eh?

36 posted on 12/27/2013 1:10:38 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("I've never seen such a conclave of minstrels in my life.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Your argument doesn’t hold water. In the 16 team format the 6 at large bids go to the 6 highest ranking teams that that didn’t win their conference. in that format the SEC will get their teams in.


37 posted on 12/27/2013 1:13:33 PM PST by sean327 (God created all men equal, then some become Marines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Gulf War One

I didn’t write the article. I posted it to let FReepers engage in a spirited discussion on the issue.


38 posted on 12/27/2013 1:18:55 PM PST by rhema ("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: sean327

Don’t look at me, Sean. No veto power resides in this FReeper. I just put the article on FR to let FReepers have a good go debating the author’s contentions.


39 posted on 12/27/2013 1:22:24 PM PST by rhema ("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Quite clearly. I regret my ambiguity.

I profoundly disagree with the original author’s goofy take. In my opinion, he could not be more wrong.


40 posted on 12/27/2013 1:22:40 PM PST by Gulf War One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson