Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Case for Female SEALs (More PC Insanity)
The Atlantic ^ | December 24, 2013 | Elliot Ackerman

Posted on 12/28/2013 7:27:24 AM PST by Timber Rattler

Last month, three women became the first of their sex to graduate from the Marine Corps’ famously grueling Advanced Infantry Training Course. The Marine Corps was asking a simple question by running small groups through these courses in experimental test batches, two to five women at a time: Can the female body withstand the rigors of infantry training? The answer, these women showed, is that it can.

So far much of the debate surrounding integration has focused on the physical capabilities of women, as if this were the singular issue. Admittedly the strain of infantry training, or even combat, is relatively easier for a 6-foot tall, 180-pound man, but there are women fit enough to survive these punishing courses. As for combat, well, if we’ve proved anything over the last decade of war, it’s that women can sustain its rigors.

So if the barrier to integrating women into the infantry isn’t a physical one then what is it?

(Excerpt) Read more at theatlantic.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: navy; politicalcorrectness; seals; specops
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: xzins

Excellent explanation.


21 posted on 12/28/2013 8:25:28 AM PST by Venturer (Half Staff the Flag of the US for Terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Amen.


22 posted on 12/28/2013 8:26:19 AM PST by Venturer (Half Staff the Flag of the US for Terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

LOL interesting idea.

When I was in Germany during the 80’s, it was suggested that since we won WWII, that all German girls between the age of 18 and 22 would be required to report for duty to service the service men. Those who were not attractive enough for personal service would be required to cook and clean. After a pregnancy or 4 years, which ever came first, the girl would be released from service.

Now it was all in jest but the individual who made the suggestion said that it would replace the men lost to WWII.


23 posted on 12/28/2013 8:31:38 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
The 0bama regime is doing everything in its power to get our service men and women killed. From this insanity to the ROE in the 'Stan.

[Sidebar: why doesn't the state controlled media give us a casualty count every day like they did when Bush was in office?]

Oh, and where is Cindy Sheehan, and Media Benjamin these days, huh?

5.56mm

24 posted on 12/28/2013 8:37:25 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

I have always thought that there needs to be three standards based upon either MOS or unit status. The standards being combat, combat support and support.

Combat units would have to pass the most stringent standards (run (2 miles timed), pushups, sit-ups, pull-ups, dead lift (60 lbs sand bag from ground up to shoulder as many times in 2 min), drag (100 yard drag of 60 lbs sand bag, timed) and a forced march (5 mile speed walk with 60 lbs ruck and weapon)

Combat support would have to pass a less rigorous set (run, pushups, sit-ups, pull ups and dead lift.

Support units would only have to pass the lest rigorous test (run, pushups, sit-ups, pull-ups)

The measure would not “accommodate” male vs. female as they are job performance based.

The most difficult standard being applied either individual or unit. For example, an Infantryman MOS assigned to a transportation or other support unit (it happens) would be required to pass the combat standard. Likewise a chemical NCO assigned to an Infantry unit (MOS based) would be required to pass the combat standard (unit based).

Promotion points should be awarded such that passing the combat standard is awarded the most promotion point but passing the support standard is awarded the least promotion points.


25 posted on 12/28/2013 8:43:14 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
The PC absurdity has now morphed into insanity

Although Women do make very effective assassins
It is usually under the cover of a “harmless” exterior

26 posted on 12/28/2013 8:44:09 AM PST by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Okay. Now that we have “the case”, the next question should be WHY? Are we having problems recruiting MALES for the SEALs these days? Anyone with a brain knows that the standards will have to be lowered in order for the “gay” people in the Pentagon to push the first female through BUDS as the “honor graduate”. It happens all of the time. Males and females are different regardless of what the “progs” like this guy would have us believe. How in the hell did this guy get the Silver Star? Didn’t Hanoi Boi Kerry get a Silver Star also?


27 posted on 12/28/2013 8:48:37 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (The Truth Is Out There. Just don't let anyone know that you're looking for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

How tough can the advanced training for women Marines be if they don’t have to pass the standard training anymore?


28 posted on 12/28/2013 8:58:01 AM PST by My hearts in London - Everett (You think you know me. You don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
My sense is that NO young lady will EVER see a real Seal mission, except, perhaps, one specifically tailored for her....but, she will eventually be put in charge of that which she could not do. That favoritism will injure morale.

But...but...but Demi Moore did it!/sarc

29 posted on 12/28/2013 8:58:55 AM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Its a physical one - even the smallest man is far stronger and weighs more than the tallest woman.

You can’t wave biological realities out of existence and Hollywood movies that show tiny women kicking strong men into unconsciousness is pure fantasy.

And assault weapons are not made to carry easy and and having to slough around 100 pound backpack on a full march takes a lot of endurance.

As well being able to fight in the heat and cold and day and night. When your life is on the line you want to be sure your partner can pull their weight. PC in the military has nothing to do with ability to defend our country but everything to do with ideology and social engineering.

Our enemies aren’t drafting women to fight us. We’re losing sight of what’s important here.


30 posted on 12/28/2013 8:59:14 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

“....easier for a 6-foot tall, 180-pound man.” I’m reminded of Audie Murphy.


31 posted on 12/28/2013 9:02:15 AM PST by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SC_Pete

Bottom line is men should stop volunteering. Bring back the draft and draft the women, too. Then let’s see what happens.


32 posted on 12/28/2013 9:03:33 AM PST by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
But...but...but Demi Moore did it!/sarc

Even Demi only half did it.

33 posted on 12/28/2013 9:04:31 AM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Yes, it has. The odd part is we’ll be downsizing all branches of the US military in the next few years. Fewer men will be needed. Drones and robots will also do more of the things humans used to be needed to do. In the meantime, the social experiment of making women fill traditionally male roles will get pushed even harder. There are tradeoffs to these types of things, of course.


34 posted on 12/28/2013 9:05:43 AM PST by elhombrelibre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
As for combat, well, if we’ve proved anything over the last decade of war, it’s that women can sustain its rigors.

Combat is not the same as the Infantry. Huge difference.

35 posted on 12/28/2013 9:06:05 AM PST by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Let ‘em. The way this government is going our military is being groomed to be used against us. I sure as Hell don’t want to be facing hardened men.


36 posted on 12/28/2013 9:07:24 AM PST by CodeToad (When ignorance rules a person's decision they are resorting to superstition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

And that’s the fine point of it. the movies are full of women showing “anything you can do I can do better” and gullible mush~for~brains are lapping it up.

I don’t envy the grunts who have to pick up the slack in real-time situations.


37 posted on 12/28/2013 9:13:16 AM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Rather than weakening the combat ranks, women could go the administrative route to becoming a general or other high ranking officer. Eisenhower never saw combat, but his administrative and strategic skills got him to the highest level of military service.

IOW, IF women want to be generals, they need to serve in the positions for which they are most qualified and prove themselves worthy of command. They are not qualified to man an artillery barrage. They call it “manning” for a reason.


38 posted on 12/28/2013 9:17:17 AM PST by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

That is the worst thing about the Hollywood, females can always beat males, propaganda, and it is propaganda. It is purposely put there to make people believe it is true.

I have been surprised how many women really believe it and not a few men do too.


39 posted on 12/28/2013 9:30:40 AM PST by yarddog (Romans 8: verses 38 and 39. "For I am persuaded".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

I was honest with myself about BUDS. There’s no way I could get through it (I’m not a wuss- just an average man), so I never applied. I don’t see how a woman is going to get through it without some major standard relaxation/elimination.

Then there’s the problem with acceptance on the teams. Nobody’s going to want to have a half-load/no-load to drag around on an op. She’ll get left behind on the boat or aircraft to do paperwork.


40 posted on 12/28/2013 9:40:53 AM PST by EricT. (ARBEIT MACHT FREI- now get back to work you taxpaying peasant!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson