The NYT with their "Bush lied" mantra directly contradicted what they had been reporting all thru the Clinton years. The Times reported time and time again in the 90's that Clinton's people believed Saddam had WMD. It was Clinton who made regime change official US policy based on WMD.
But when Bush couldn't find WMD, it was suddenly only Bush who had "lied" with no more mention of what the Clinton people had said over and over again.
Now the Slimes is again up to their old tricks.
I remember, during the vote to deploy troops in preperation for the attack on Iraq, Hillary saying she didn’t need to refer to the intelligence the Bush administration presented with regard to WMD. She said instead that she would rely on the information developed during the Clinton administration and she voted yes on that resolution.
When the supposed "offensive video" was on youtube it had roughly 400 views, prior to the attack.
Now I don't know just how many people in Benghazi even had access to the internet on 9/11/12, but it could not POSSIBLY be a huge number.
And to put a finer point on it, there are WAY worse "offensive" anti-muslim videos out there, and were more widely seen at the time.
What was SO special about this particular video?
Was it projected on a movie screen to ramp up anti-US fever?
And supposedly the Muslim Brotherhood was behind the attacks, yet are in NO WAY associated with al-Qaida.
Even though they themselves admit they are.
This "story" stinks on so many levels.