Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Four injunctions against the Obamacare contraceptive mandate (all in one day: a new record!)
American Thinker ^ | January 1, 2014 | Thomas Lifson

Posted on 01/01/2014 11:23:57 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o

Is this some kind of record? On the last day of 2013 four different federal appeals courts issued temporary injunctions against enforcement of the Obamacare contraceptive mandate. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals acted on two different cases, Michigan Catholic Conference v. Sebelius and The Catholic Diocese of Nashville et al v. Sebelius, while the DC Circuit Court of Appeals acted in The Catholic Archbishop of Washington et al v Sebelius. Meanwhile, no less than Obama-appointee Sonia Sotomayor issued an injunction in the case of The Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, Denver, v Sebelius.

All in all, quite a way to kick off Obamacare.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aca; catholic; conscience; mandate

Little Sisters of the Poor, who staff homes for the elderly poor, say they will LEAVE THE USA rather than participate in funding contraception, sterilization, and abortion.

"If you have religious 'free exercise' you can keep your 'free exercise' --- elsewhere."

If the poor sisters do not comply, they face hefty fines. Although it varies between locations, some face amounts of $100 per employee, per day. Fines could have started today, Jan. 1, 2014, without this temporary injunction.

The Little Sisters are being defended pro-bono by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, whose clients have included religions from A-Z: Anglicans to Zoroastrians. The Becket Fund has defended dozens of faiths including: Amish, Buddhists, Evangelical Christians, Hindus, Jews, Lutherans, Mormons, Native Americans, Non-Denominational Christians, Presbyterians, Roman Catholics, Santeros, Sikhs, Unitarian Universalists, and Zoroastrians.

Please support with your prayers and your resources:

http://www.becketfund.org/

THANK YOU!

1 posted on 01/01/2014 11:23:57 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Working link...

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/01/four_injunctions_against_the_obamacare_contraceptive_mandate_yesterday.html


2 posted on 01/01/2014 11:32:53 AM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Supreme Court of the United States

No. 13A691

LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR HOME FOR THE AGED, DENVER,
COLORADO, A COLORADO NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, ET AL.,

Applicants,
v.

KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN
SERVICES, ET AL.

O R D E R

UPON CONSIDERATION of the application of counsel for the
applicants,
IT IS ORDERED that respondents are temporarily enjoined from
enforcing against applicants the contraceptive coverage requirements
imposed by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 42 U. S. C.
§ 300gg-13(a)(4), and related regulations pending the receipt of a response
and further order of the undersigned or of the Court. The response to the
application is due Friday, January 3, 2014, by 10 a.m.

/s/ Sonia Sotomayor
Associate Justice of the Supreme
Court of the United States

Dated this 31st
day of December 2013.


3 posted on 01/01/2014 11:37:59 AM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Do the “Little Sisters of the Poor” still field a football team?


4 posted on 01/01/2014 11:42:52 AM PST by Cowboy Bob (They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

In law, intervention is a procedure to allow a nonparty, called intervenor to join ongoing litigation, either as a matter of right or at the discretion of the court, without the permission of the original litigants. The basic rationale for intervention is that a judgment in a particular case may affect the rights of nonparties, who ideally should have the right to be heard.

Justice Sotomayor grants temporary Obamacare exemption to nuns.

Sotomayor gave the government until Friday to file a response in the case. Her order extends only to the group of nuns and does not apply more broadly to the Affordable Care Act and its requirements.

Sotomayor, an Obama appointee, is at risk for an objection by an intervenor objecting to the appointments of an ineligible President. Appointments by an ineligible President are a violation of the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution. A sustained objection will require a hearing on Presidential eligibility or the Justice must recuse.


5 posted on 01/01/2014 11:44:07 AM PST by SvenMagnussen (1983 ... the year Obama became a naturalized U.S. citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

Yes, we call them the Browns.


6 posted on 01/01/2014 11:46:18 AM PST by darkangel82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

Yes; they beat the Redskins this season.


7 posted on 01/01/2014 11:47:30 AM PST by I-ambush (Don't let it bring you down, it's only castles burning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Oh no....don’t let the SCOTUS rule on this with John “Sell-Out” Roberts casting the swing vote again. He’s afraid of the Obama thugs who must have something devastating on this coward.

Did the Founders provide an impeachment mechanism for wayward Supreme Court justices? If not, they should have.


8 posted on 01/01/2014 12:05:42 PM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen
Sotomayor, an Obama appointee, is at risk for an objection by an intervenor objecting to the appointments of an ineligible President. Appointments by an ineligible President are a violation of the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution. A sustained objection will require a hearing on Presidential eligibility or the Justice must recuse.

This is the first I've read about the intervention procedure. Does Sotomayer's tailored order preclude an intervenor at this point?

9 posted on 01/01/2014 12:07:08 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob
Of course. They invented the "Hail Mary" pass.

Happy New Year, Cowboy Bob!
10 posted on 01/01/2014 12:07:27 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Praise God from Whom all blessings flow, / Praise Him all people here below.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

A narrow ruling, covers the Little Sisters only. What would have been earth-shattering is if the Wise Latina enjoined enforcement in toto.


11 posted on 01/01/2014 12:09:35 PM PST by NonValueAdded (It's not the penalty, it's the lack of coverage on 1 Jan. Think about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen
I'm sure Valerie Jarrett is burning up the phone lines of these judges with threats to "out" them if they have ANY personal history.

She is Obama's "triggerwoman"!

12 posted on 01/01/2014 12:10:34 PM PST by greyfoxx39 (We can thank Mitt Romney for the present situation in our country. His feet are made of clay.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

Too bad. I was hoping the term “response” was vague enough that it left the door open to an intervention by a third party.


13 posted on 01/01/2014 12:16:19 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

You know what? Voters, both political parties, are so fed up that they’ll forgive just about anything in a politician’s past as long as they don’t allow themselves to be blackmailed. What we won’t forgive is backstabbing traitors who would rather sacrifice us than suffer some personal embarrassment.


14 posted on 01/01/2014 12:18:53 PM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Did these people finally find their souls?


15 posted on 01/01/2014 12:20:30 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

You must not be aware of the supposed blackmailing from Obama. About Roberts’ adopted children.

Do a search for Roberts and obamacare.


16 posted on 01/01/2014 12:21:56 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: grania
You know what? Voters, both political parties, are so fed up that they’ll forgive just about anything in a politician’s past as long as they don’t allow themselves to be blackmailed. What we won’t forgive is backstabbing traitors who would rather sacrifice us than suffer some personal embarrassment.

Very well said...however the experience we have had to date is that the politician folds to the Obama administration.

17 posted on 01/01/2014 12:25:25 PM PST by greyfoxx39 (We can thank Mitt Romney for the present situation in our country. His feet are made of clay.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson