Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OBAMA ADMIN PRESSURING JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR TO ALLOW CONTRACEPTION MANDATE
Catholic Vote ^ | January 3, 2014 | STEVE SKOJEC

Posted on 01/03/2014 9:09:40 AM PST by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 01/03/2014 9:09:40 AM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; GregB; Berlin_Freeper; SumProVita; narses; bboop; SevenofNine; Ronaldus Magnus; tiki; ...

Catholic ping!


2 posted on 01/03/2014 9:10:03 AM PST by NYer ("The wise man is the one who can save his soul. - St. Nimatullah Al-Hardini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Pressuring a Judge? Isn't that, like, you know ... illegal?

3 posted on 01/03/2014 9:12:25 AM PST by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Again, they keep moving the ball and changing the rules.


4 posted on 01/03/2014 9:13:20 AM PST by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

She must have a very small file to blackmail her with if they haven’t bent her will by now.


5 posted on 01/03/2014 9:13:32 AM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Hmm, maybe we will get to see just how wise the Wise Latina really is. Or maybe just how independent the Judicial branch really is.


6 posted on 01/03/2014 9:13:46 AM PST by Tupelo (I am feeling more like Philip Nolan every day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Thank You John Roberts. All of this horror story could have been avoided.


7 posted on 01/03/2014 9:14:35 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
This is something that should never be. The Supreme Court was set up totally separate from the "checks and balances" system.

I believe Madison said that was the danger of this court.

There should be absolutely no contact between this court and any branch. The court is unique.

And it was given a job for "life" so no one would be beholding for a job when they left the bench.

8 posted on 01/03/2014 9:15:08 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Obama: “Wise up, Wise Latina. Or else.”


9 posted on 01/03/2014 9:15:24 AM PST by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Aren’t muslims exempt from 0bamacare for religious reasons?


10 posted on 01/03/2014 9:15:28 AM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
chief justice roberts photo: Justice  John Roberts Chief Justice Roberts.jpg

Supreme Court justices are immune from being blackmailed/cajoled...uh, nevermind.

11 posted on 01/03/2014 9:16:27 AM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
I suspect that Sotomayor is allowing this because it is advantageous to the administration to do so.

I don't know what the end game is but I just don't believe the wise latina would jump ship on this issue at this time.

12 posted on 01/03/2014 9:17:53 AM PST by oldbrowser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
First of all....4 others signed off with John Roberts.

Secondly, it shows what a mess this grand plan is, was and will always be. It will lead to it being abolished. It needs to be reversed "FOREVER" just as prohibition was reversed...by a Constitutional amendment.

13 posted on 01/03/2014 9:19:39 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser
I don't know what the end game is but I just don't believe the wise latina would jump ship on this issue at this time.

I agree. I think this is just smoke and mirrors.

14 posted on 01/03/2014 9:19:56 AM PST by greyfoxx39 (We can thank Mitt Romney for the present situation in our country. His feet are made of clay.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1

One of the realities of living in our divided and rabidly partisan world is that once normal actions are exaggerated greatly into heinous acts. This is true of both left and right. The DoJ is responding to Sotomayor’s TRO. They are making a legal argument,a preposterous one but it’s their argument. Responding to a judge’s ruling is not in any way “pressuring” the judge. Are there pressures being applied behind closed doors? Maybe. But it’s not what this article is talking about.


15 posted on 01/03/2014 9:20:53 AM PST by xkaydet65 (.You have never tasted freedom, else you would know it is purchased not with gold but with steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser

It’s paperwork only...strictly procedural. Has nothing to do with her position.


16 posted on 01/03/2014 9:21:06 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Given that she was nominated by the demonstrably most idiotic president we’ve ever had, I had absolutely no respect for her.

However, she may have a bit more cojones (and undoubtedly more intelligence) than the DORK in chief.

Perhaps she’ll make a good justice after all.


17 posted on 01/03/2014 9:22:01 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1
Pressuring a Judge? Isn't that, like, you know ... illegal?

This article is rather misleading in this one respect. The Obama Administration isn't "pressuring" Justice Sotomayor. When Justice Sotomayor issued the order in question, granting the temporary injunction, she requested that the Department of Justice file by today a written response, to the extent that Justice was arguing against the continuation of the injunction.

The Department of Justice has now filed its response, per Justice Sotomayor's request, that's all. That's how the process is supposed to work.

18 posted on 01/03/2014 9:22:10 AM PST by DSH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

Is that true? Anyone have a source?


19 posted on 01/03/2014 9:23:02 AM PST by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo

She appears to have a fondness for Catholic nuns. I wonder how easily that can be intimidated out of her.


20 posted on 01/03/2014 9:23:03 AM PST by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson