Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lbryce

I looked over the exact verbiage. *IF* they do as they are stating they will — and that is a BIG IF — then I guess I have no problem with the clarifications.


21 posted on 01/03/2014 3:33:48 PM PST by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lazamataz

The words in the actual law, the 1968 GCA, that disqualify a person from buying a gun are “-—adjudicated mentally defective”. The only “clarification “that might be useful is how one gets himself “adjudicated.” Everything else looks to be double talk BS-——and theeerrrrreeeee goes the BS flag——wheeeee.


42 posted on 01/03/2014 5:24:38 PM PST by cherokee1 (skip the names---just kick the buttz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Agreed. The NRA reacted to Sandy Hook by pointing to better handling mental illness, and that Adam Lanza was apparently very very sick young man. If their political stance is to mean anything we as a society have to get better at stopping these sick monsters.

OTOH I’d prefer it if Congress were doing something like passing a real law instead of letting President Executive Order whip out his own version.


53 posted on 01/03/2014 9:07:00 PM PST by sgtyork (Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson