Posted on 01/04/2014 8:55:40 AM PST by concretebob
I'm still trying to figure out how the New York Times missed evidence that Al Qaeda was present in Benghazi in 2012. I found clear signs less than an hour after I started working the story for the American Media Institute. The New York Times employs a vast research department. The AMI does not. I investigated the story using only basic gumshoe methods. How come I found evidence, and the New York Times did not? I'll be talking about this tomorrow on Clear Channel radio in California. You can listen in to 960 KNEW at 3 p.m. Pacific time.
(Excerpt) Read more at susankatzkeating.com ...
PING!!!
US News is scripted for liberals - socialist - leftist ideology — that’s it — the freedom of press that the US Constitution grants them to produce fair and balance - truthful news - they take it to evil ends....which is why they cannot be trusted an should never be listed to - ever!
They need to be reformed - or drove out of business - that includes all of them...hell Russia Today and the British News service does a better job covering events in the US...that’s sad!
Broadcast is today at 6PM Eastern, 3PM Pacific time.
pimping?
The Slimes at the Times found “no evidence” of Al Qaeda because this was their week to kickoff their “We’re Ready For Hillary” campaign. This was the Slimes first shot fired at the American people for their future commie “leader”.
Because you don't have relatives working in the 0Bama administration?
Plus you’re not paving the way for the Hillary machine.
It wouldn’t be politically correct for Al Qaeda to be present in Benghazi!
Well, bob, if you’re not willing to present the evidence here now, so that we may discuss this intelligently on the radio later, then I’m not going to bother listening. Deal?
Blog pimping should hurt.
NYT followed protocol. They went to the source of news first, Hillary and the Obama people. After receiving instructions on what the message should be, the NYT had their resources filter information to support that message. It’s called journalism, and the left owns it.
Uh, propaganda.
Thanks CB. As I read more drivel the MSM’s recycling re: video:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/01/did_susan_rice_really_lie_comments.html#disqus_thread
I find it strange no one talks about the AlQ video re: 9/11 deaths to Americans in revenge for al-Libi.
As far as the other video farce, it wouldn’t surprise me if the domestic head traitor had it made for the purpose it served.
With everything this man has done and not done, crickets.
I always wondered how the residents in Germany let things get to the point it did... I’m seeing it right before my eyes.
Yes..it is out and out propaganda. Does anyone really believe their bs aside from the far left? I don’t think so.
The answer is simple.
The faux maggot infested reporters for the Slimes did their investigating in the gay hot tubs for the gay mediots getting a pay check at the Slimes.
There was no reporting.
The slimes published this bs to protect her Thighness in 2016.
Why is the New Yawk Times gonna win a Pulitzer for their story and you are not?
I had heard that up until the attack the Youtube video had 35 views. Obviously, with 35 views it could hardly be a blip on the radar for an attack. Can anyone confirm this information and if true, why hasn’t this been discussed on any news channel?
rebuilding Brand Hillery...
The NYT is, like virtually every other MSM outlet, completely dedicated to the liberal agenda. They (none of them) are any longer "news" organizations, they are propaganda outlets pure and simple.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.