and since the docs were suing because this ‘tax’ law originated in the SENATE instead of the House, Roberts had the opportunity to cleanse himself but refused
Could someone explain what the DoJ’s response is here? It seems to me they are just saying, “Sign the form because we tell you to, not because it will actually do anything”.
Which is crazy on its face (if true)! What kind of retort is that?! I get that the Little Sisters are saying they can’t hire a third person to distribute abortifacients for them. But again, it seems the govt response to that argument is “Sign the paper because we tell you to, not that we even expect you to hire a third person”
Is that really their “argument” now? If so, what kind of sense does that make, in any world? How could any court, even one corrupted by Roberts, accept such an “argument”? It’s meaningless! (If true)