Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rubio Demands States’ Right to Ignore the Poor (NYT Excessive Literary License Barf Alert)
New York Times ^ | January 9, 2014 | David Firestone

Posted on 01/09/2014 3:46:57 PM PST by lbryce

For a senator who likes to hold himself out as the future of the Republican brand, Marco Rubio has come up with a remarkably retrograde contribution to the party’s chorus of phony empathy for the poor: Let the states do it.

All anti-poverty funds should be combined into one “flex fund,” he said in a speech on Wednesday, and then given to the states to spend as they see fit. He actually believes that states will “design and fund creative initiatives” to address inequality.

“Washington continues to rule over the world of anti-poverty policy-making, with beltway bureaucrats picking and choosing rigid nationwide programs and forcing America’s elected state legislatures to watch from the sidelines,” he said. “As someone who served nine years in the state house, two of them as Speaker, I know how frustrating this is.”

(Excerpt) Read more at takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: nyt; slimes
There it is. The mantra in which we all will be verbally flogged to death for the forseeable future. Inequality. The political imperative to socially engineer equality across the board. Not that groteque seventy year social catastrophe rearing its ugly head again having already been relegated to the dustbin of history not long ago.

You can't change the rules of nature. Existence in whatever form is inherently unequal, diverse, counter to that of the very people you want to socially engineer as such.

1 posted on 01/09/2014 3:46:57 PM PST by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lbryce
For a senator who likes to hold himself out as the future of the Republican brand...

I stopped reading right here.

Mister amnesty-for-illegal-aliens Rubio will never be the future of the GOP brand.

And it it ever did happen, there would be no (as in no) voters remaining in the party, so no GOP to have a brand.

.

2 posted on 01/09/2014 3:52:04 PM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
We are watching you David Firestone.

5.56mm

3 posted on 01/09/2014 3:53:00 PM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
"Equal opportunity" does NOT produce "equal outcome".

To paraphrase a quote from some famous person (I can't remember who)..."Making the rich poorer does not make the poor richer".

I can't fault Rubio on this call...the individual States are certainly better able to serve their truly needy populations than the Federal Government is with their "one size fits all, here, have some benefits" for all the "inequalified"...

4 posted on 01/09/2014 4:00:34 PM PST by 88keys ("work and purpose"...election 2014!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce; Admin Moderator
THIS IS AN EGREGIOUS OPINION PIECE, IMHO

Sorry for shouting...read the article, it's a blog and a bunch of blather.

5 posted on 01/09/2014 4:04:25 PM PST by 88keys ("work and purpose"...election 2014!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

States certainly should have a right to “ignore the poor.” That way we can all vote with our feet. Mr. Firestone can move somewhere with generous handouts, and I can move somewhere where indolence and incompetence is not rewarded.


6 posted on 01/09/2014 4:06:11 PM PST by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Poverty wins!

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2014/01/08/war-on-poverty-at-50-despite-trillions-spent-poverty-won/


7 posted on 01/09/2014 4:06:42 PM PST by carriage_hill (Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
Revision:Existence in whatever form is inherently unequal, diverse, and any attempt to "legislate" quality of outcome is counter to that which you want to socially engineer as such.
8 posted on 01/09/2014 4:07:03 PM PST by lbryce (Obama:The Worst is Yet To Come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
And here the people on the FR Texas board were so enjoying reading today's L.A. Slimes for its elegant balance of yuk-yuk and ick-ick gay gay gay stories ....

The NYT was such a phun read when Pinchy was pushing all his gay girlfriends for top jobs in writing and editing, and now Pinchdarling has gone and changed the story to sad, dull, and weepy-downer type stuff.

Bye, Times, you're circling the bowl faster and faster. Soon you'll only have MoDo and Krugman the Great Stone Head writing for you.

9 posted on 01/09/2014 4:08:09 PM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Well, putting aside that the author of the article is a blithering idiot, Rubio is still completely wrong.

The future of antipoverty isn’t to split federal money among the states. The future of antipoverty should be to eliminate all federal antipoverty, cut federal taxes a similar amount, and let the states do it.

Then you won’t have a federal bureaucracy gobbling up most of the money before returning what’s left to the states as a big favor.


10 posted on 01/09/2014 4:09:55 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 88keys

That’s the point behind the concept of “Barf Alert”, and for which the term ‘Slimes’ has been such a useful moniker for the Grey B*t*h. To alert you not to be take what is written at face value, but to demonstrate the heinous, Un-American character, agenda that the perfidious Times’ left wing ideology espouses.


11 posted on 01/09/2014 4:13:20 PM PST by lbryce (Obama:The Worst is Yet To Come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
Forget it. Because there would still be federal strings attached. Which mean they will still make the rules.

The only federal programs that should be block-granted to the states are Medicaid and Medicare.

12 posted on 01/09/2014 4:17:10 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Obama is very angry and will get to the bottom of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

The Feds have effed-it up so bad over the past fifty years, David Firestone can kiss my ass. More New York Times propaganda.


13 posted on 01/09/2014 4:31:09 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (Play the 'Knockout Game' with someone owning a 9mm and you get what you deserve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
He actually believes that states will “design and fund creative initiatives” to address inequality.

he actually believes that? Surely he jests, everyone knows state governments hate their own people and if it weren't for the feds the states would have fed the poor to pigs!

//sarcasm

14 posted on 01/09/2014 4:34:50 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce; All
All anti-poverty funds should be combined into one “flex fund,” he said in a speech on Wednesday, and then given to the states to spend as they see fit. He actually believes that states will “design and fund creative initiatives” to address inequality.

Rubio's plan for the poor is a masterpiece of political correctness imo. This is because his flex fund allows corrupt federal lawmakers to continue to make constitutionally indefensible promises of federal welfare to the poor, such voters likely not understanding that the feds have no constitutional authority to promise government support for poor voters.

Rubio's plan then allows the states decide for themselves how to spend state revenues on behalf of the poor, such revenues cleverly disguised as federal funding.

The reality is that Justice John Marshall had officially clarified that Congress cannot lay taxes in the name of state power issues, unique state government power to tax and spend on behalf of the poor protected by the 10th Amendment.

“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

15 posted on 01/09/2014 5:13:59 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce; All

Rubio supports Illegal Alien Amnesty...so he will have Hispanic poor covered


16 posted on 01/09/2014 6:12:36 PM PST by SeminoleCounty (Amnesty And Not Ending ObamaCare Will Kill GOP In 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson