Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US LOST 2 MILLION WORKERS IN 2013
Breitbart ^ | Jan 10, 2014 | By Mike Flynn

Posted on 01/10/2014 12:54:38 PM PST by Jim Robinson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 next last
To: xzins

Yeah well, if you look up the classes to learn a trade and earn a certificate, it is the main reason, that is the prices, that made me decide to put off university. For fifty thousand I can get a dozen certificates and credentials and learn a lot more than one semester in university.


81 posted on 01/11/2014 10:35:47 AM PST by CorporateStepsister (I am NOT going to force a man to make my dreams come true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

Thank You! Lets be lovers!

Too bad the people we pay to fight these battles are not doing their jobs.


82 posted on 01/11/2014 10:36:41 AM PST by CorporateStepsister (I am NOT going to force a man to make my dreams come true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
The unemployment rate is currently defined as those people collecting unemployment benefits. When the benefits run out, you are "no longer seeking employment."

INCORRECT

Jeepers, read the thread before spouting nonsense.

83 posted on 01/11/2014 10:51:10 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

A Brilliant Prophecy From 93 Years Ago
H. L. Mencken (born 1880 - died 1956) was a journalist, satirist, critic, and Democrat . He wrote this editorial while working for the Baltimore Evening Sun, which appeared in the July 26, 1920 edition.

“As democracy is perfected, the office of the President represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day, the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last and the White House will be occupied by a downright fool and complete narcissistic moron.”

- - - H. L. Mencken, The Baltimore Evening Sun, July 26, 1920

So it was written and so it has come to pass.


84 posted on 01/11/2014 10:55:16 AM PST by Dqban22 (IVINIC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican

Yes; I have to believe that sooner or later the native born Americans are going to start breaking things whether the government likes it or not.


85 posted on 01/11/2014 11:09:35 AM PST by CorporateStepsister (I am NOT going to force a man to make my dreams come true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

Comment #86 Removed by Moderator

To: 1rudeboy
INCORRECT

"More than a half million long-term unemployed people are losing their federal extended unemployment benefits. And when the checks stop coming, one of two things are likely to occur: They'll take any job they can get to stay afloat financially or they'll drop out of the labor force completely.

Either way, they won't be counted as unemployed anymore."

Why the unemployment rate will fall

FWIW

87 posted on 01/11/2014 11:45:55 AM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: xzins
One small businessman on Cavuto was saying that he’s looking for any other option than hiring: out-sourcing, temp company, or technology. He said he’s actively avoiding hiring because it is the most expensive and the most unpredictable expense he has, and therefore, the worst way to get his work done. He needs predictability.

I've read elsewhere that in Europe most hiring is temporary or contract, which is why the world's largest temp agency, Ranstad, is based there.

Employment agencies are probably a good investment.

88 posted on 01/11/2014 11:48:20 AM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
I'll try to spell this out as simply as I can: whether or not you collect unemployment compensation, and whether you are eligible or ineligible for it, has no bearing on the way the unemployment rate is calculated.

And the above is not in conflict with your link.

89 posted on 01/11/2014 11:49:53 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
And the above is not in conflict with your link.

OK. I guess I don't understand what you're trying to say.

90 posted on 01/11/2014 11:54:45 AM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

We didn’t lose 2 million workers, we lost 2 million jobs. This is just Obama/Democrap communist propaganda.


91 posted on 01/11/2014 11:56:53 AM PST by CodeToad (When ignorance rules a person's decision they are resorting to superstition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reeses
People are just going to have to get to the point where they will act in general strikes.

The Founders were wise to forbid internal tariffs.

But the truth is, external tariffs are unwise as well, as they distort the operation of the market. Consumption taxes should be solely for raising revenue, not for rewarding narrow constituencies at the expense of the consumer.

92 posted on 01/11/2014 12:35:07 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

“The stores are full of Chinese made stuff while Americans sit unemployed.”

Until you address the reasons why that is, all tariffs do is lower the standard of living.

And that is the kicker, isn’t it? NO ONE wants to address the reasons why, and to do so is likely racist, and homophobic, since it makes Democrats, (and some spineless Republicans) look bad.


93 posted on 01/11/2014 5:17:30 PM PST by tcrlaf (Well, it is what the Sheeple voted for....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

The reason why is the wage differential. You can’t address that without the tariff unless you want to lower the American wage down to the Chinese level.

You can eliminated all tariffs and regulations and still not compete with China because of the wage differential.

The tariffs will prevent the U.S. from descending to the Chinese level.

Tariffs will not lower the standard of living, because 23% of our workforce is unemployed. Putting them back to work will raise our standard of livings, help balance the gov’t budget and reduce our future tax burdens.


94 posted on 01/11/2014 7:13:33 PM PST by DannyTN (A>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

As the CEO’s of Intel, Emerson Electric, and many others have publicly stated, wages in the automation age make little difference.

It’s taxes, UNLIMITED CIVIL LIABILITY, insane government regulations, and inane enviro regs that have made manufacturing in America uncompetitive, even with transportation costs at $100 oil. Just look at what government has done to coal, as but one example.

Wages and unionism are frankly at the bottom of the list.


95 posted on 01/11/2014 8:14:37 PM PST by tcrlaf (Well, it is what the Sheeple voted for....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: central_va

High tariffs and low (or no) income tax is a Conservative position.
Conversely, Free Trade(no tariffs) and high income taxes are a progressive liberal position. No other way to look at it.

Actually, high tariffs, and high income taxes are the positions held by the most LIBERAL Western countries, such as France.

The Conservative position should be low tariffs, free trade, and a COMPETITIVE manufacturing environment, supported by penalty for forgien gov-subsidized product.


96 posted on 01/11/2014 8:17:29 PM PST by tcrlaf (Well, it is what the Sheeple voted for....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Look at product costs. The wage differential dwarfs the costs of regulation.

The CEO’s complain about regulation because it’s a corporate headache and they still maintain some headquarters and operations here.

Not everything can be easily automated. That’s why they use Chinese labor. If all the processes were automated, then raw material costs and transportation costs would rule the day. But they aren’t. And that’s where most of our jobs have gone.

The manufacturing that has remained in the U.S. is highly automated. But their is an opportunity to bring back jobs that aren’t highly automated.


97 posted on 01/11/2014 8:52:29 PM PST by DannyTN (A>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

France is part of the EU which has high tariffs. But Germany is cleaning the other countries clocks with the EU because of the low tariffs within the EU.


98 posted on 01/11/2014 8:53:53 PM PST by DannyTN (A>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: xzins; RitaOK; laplata; Jane Long; ladyjane; Republicanprofessor; ConorMacNessa; SoFloFreeper; ...

Americans are not known for heeding warnings.

Americans are very good at overcoming a bad situation once the bad situation has visited its cruel wrath on America, AND in a manner that is convincing to most Americans that the situation truly is bad.

Since the Socialist (FDR called it “Liberal”) FDR Era began 80 years ago, American leaders in all fields have clung to the “primed pump,” or “Keyensian Economic Philosophy (KEP)” which states in more elegant economic jargon than this simplified version: “ all ya gotta is keep throwing money at the problem until it goes away!” [Works well in divorce cases, but not in Government.]

After the FHA went bankrupt in 9-2008, nobody blamed the FHA, it was merely a lack of money.

Since then KEP has been used but evidence is lacking that KEP worked from 2008 to now.

IOW, Keyensian Economics was tested, and failed.

We are in a bad situation, but our leaders are not convinced that it is so, because they refuse to believe the results of the above mentioned test.

Thus, the situation will get a lot worse, or we will change leaders.

I suspect that the former will occur before the latter.


99 posted on 01/11/2014 10:12:06 PM PST by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: TomServo

Now just a cotton pickin’ minit here. Let’s be fair. The MSM may be a circus, and so is Washington, but what about the bread?


100 posted on 01/11/2014 11:14:56 PM PST by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson