Posted on 01/12/2014 6:43:40 AM PST by Kaslin
The economy is sluggish and job creation is almost non –existent. That means it’s time for politicians and government bureaucrats to control yet even more of our money – right?
If you really believe that government is the entity from whom all blessings flow, and if you really believe that politicians and government bureaucrats do better things with your money than you do, then yes – it’s time for more government control of our economy.
That’s what President Obama was calling for last week in his speech about “income inequality,” the buzz phrase of choice for 2014 among those who believe, as he does, that politicians can and do spend our money better than “ordinary” citizens. And with the President having established the phrase, its now up to like-minded liberals in the worlds of academia, media, entertainment and government to repeat that phrase incessantly between now and November’s elections.
That’s why it was no surprise to see University of California – Berkley Professor and former presidential advisor Robert Reich combine the President’s “income inequality” phrase with the disastrous employment report from December in an editorial that calls for – “shocking!”- more control of our economy by politicians! Mr. Reich won’t be persuaded to rethink his views, but his ideas will be reiterated all year by people who have no alternative ideas of their own, so be prepared to hear both the President’s and Mr. Reich’s rhetoric to be frequently repeated.
Below is a list of some of Mr. Reich’s plan, with accompanying details that he, and other “government knows best” liberals prefer to ignore:
Launch a major jobs program to rebuild the nation’s crumbling infrastructure: Mr. Reich is correct, that huge chunks of our nation’s infrastructure are “crumbling.” What he ignores is the fact that President Obama and the previous congress already launched what was promised to be a “major jobs program” to rebuild our infrastructure – it was called the “Economic Stimulus Bill.”
Remember Senator Obama’s promises of “shovel ready jobs” once he took office? That’s what the President’s stimulus plan, officially known as the “American Recovery and Reinvestment” Act, was supposed to have produced. It began with a price tag of $787 billion and ended up costing about $831 billion (note: only government can get away with miscalculating by $50 billion, not private businesses). Our infrastructure is still crumbling, but current and future generations of Americans are nonetheless saddled with the $831 billion in debt (and that isn’t including the interest).
Rehire all the teachers, social workers, police, and other public service employees who were laid off in the recession: This sounds and “feels” terrific – why wouldn’t everybody want full employment for teachers, cops, and so forth? The real question, however, is this: how badly were federal, state and local government workers actually hurt by the recession, as compared to us lowly people who work in the private sector?
In truth, huge chunks of President Obama’s “stimulus bill” funds were spent either on state and local government workers themselves, or on government programs that provided things for already existing government employees to do. The Obama Adminstration’s “Race to the Top” program for public schools took $4.35 billion out of the stimulus bill fund, and gave employed teachers and school administrators lots of hoops to jump through. The Administration’s “Booty Call” sexually transmitted diseases education program spent another $335 million of the stimulus funds, and gave government social workers lots of important things to do (although one can imagine that this program, in particular, stimulated something other than the economy).
Indeed, state and local government workers (as well as federal employees) have done relatively well since the recession, as compared to the rest of us. Combine this with the fact that most all government employees receive a defined benefit retirement pension that is backed by taxpayers (where do you fine retirement like that in the private sector these days?), and a government job looks pretty confortable in light of the frailties of the private sector.
Raise the minimum wage at least to its inflation-adjusted value 40 years ago — which would be well over $10 an hour: Once again it feels good to propose such an idea, as long as you don’t look at the consequences – and higher wage requirements imposed by governments almost always bring about a decline in business and job growth.
Worse yet, Reich makes no reference in his recent editorial to the actual source of genuine job creation: the local small business owner who is willing to work hard, take risks, and hopefully create genuine authentic wealth over time. If liberals would listen to what small business America is saying, they might learn about the perils of a lack of small business lending, or the fear instilled in the hearts of business owners by an out of control I.R.S. and E.P.A. and U.S. Department of Justice.
But to acknowledge that government agencies and programs might be a part of our economic problem is incomprehensible to the government-centric liberals among us. Hopefully there are sufficient numbers of our fellow Americans who do comprehend this reality, and make better choices in the elections that lie ahead.
Either that, or my preference is one single import duty.
One everything.
(no exceptions whatsoever)
Energy sources like oil. Food. And all manufactured goods from everywhere.
No exceptions whatsoever. I say that, because we do not want to build up another government bureaucracy. The import duty must be universal, with no exceptions whatsoever.
That said, it should also be offset by a decrease in the income tax.
Those two, would dramatically alter the groundrules for American business, and immediately start a massive repatriation of American businesses right here.
Even foreign companies would be encouraged to build in America.
America has been chasing every company possible, elsewhere. Most to China.
China now exports more than America.
Bring back American businesses now.
Fix the problem? Politicians are the problem!
The headline is kind of like asking “The bathtub is filled with water. Can the drain plug fix the problem if we leave it where it is?”
Its not going to happen.
Well I say it’s either that, or we start planning for America’s eventual collapse.
What we are doing currently, is rapidly sending America down the tubes.
Bring back American jobs now.
Not as long as they can shuffle money around and borrow money.
Spending by the two most recent administrations have made tax cuts a perceived impossibility. Perceived because both parties consider Laffer’s Curve a fairy tale.
I am against whatever the UniParty™ is for .
The only thing politicians can do at this point to help the job markets would be to get government out of the way...
This is anathema to both Parties, so instead they’ll try to be SEEN to be doing SOMETHING the results of which they know damn well they’ll never be held to account for.
Lather. Rinse. Repeat.
Actually its been happening for decades now.
We’re on a sinking ship and people are drilling more holes.
Two words: Hell, NO!
Fire the incompetent political hacks and eliminate all the job killing rules, regulations, and laws the Donkeys and GOPee Establishment have put into place. How about tarring, feathering these corrupt hacks, and ride them out of town on a rail? Or, employ a tree, a rope, assembly required, and repeat.
Politians are the problem. We need a leader of heroic proportions. Under the guize of civil rights the marxists have destroyed our Republic..
Ronald Reagan
Politicians ARE the problem...
(That was my trick answer)
;-)
Funny how the pic in this article shows a bunch of job hunting hopefuls are out at a “job fair”...
If you knew how much of a farce those events are, and the real numbers of how many people actually find work through those events, there would never be another one held that would draw very many people to those shams...
They are, for lack of a better definition a resume grab...Those firms setting those events up are out there to give the HR folks a legitimate chance to justify their existance...Which in reality is tough...
The whole exercise is a “feel good” effort that actually produces very little in return...
And it is designed to do that, and the expectations by these corporations and other businesses, chamber of commerces, and other community groups already know the return is minimal, at best...
So where does that leave us???
All you have to do to check the weather is open a window...
It really is that easy...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.