Skip to comments.Condom Research: Great Moments in Wasteful Spending…or Great Moments in Bizarre Regulation?
Posted on 01/13/2014 6:14:39 AM PST by Kaslin
Every so often, I share stories about the ridiculous and outrageous way in which the federal government squanders our money.
So when I saw this New York Post story about the feds pissing away a six-figure sum on condom research, I figured this would be a perfect addition to my collection of government waste stories.
The federal government is stretching your tax dollars in search of the perfect condom. The National Institutes of Health will spend $224,863 to test 95 custom-fitted condoms so every American man can choose the one that fits just right.
And its a good match with this story about Washington flushing away more than $400K on research about men not liking to wear condoms.
Do we really need to spend other peoples money to figure out that guys, if they have to wear condoms, would like them to fit?!?
But then I found something in the story that genuinely surprised me. Apparently there are federal regulations that restrict the types of condoms that can be sold in the United States!
The NIH blames US regulatory guidelines for American men having to choose from a narrow range of condom sizes. The six-figure grant was awarded to TheyFit of Covington, Ga., which offers a wide variety of condoms that vary in length from a bit more than 3 inches to nearly 9 ¹/2 and in width. Theyre available in European Union countries, but not in the United States, where they would have to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
Im flabbergasted. I can vaguely understand why the government might regulate some aspects of condom production, such as durability rules to limit breakage. I dont think such red tape is necessary because companies already plenty of incentive because of both reputational risk and preemptive legal protection to maintain good standards.
But at least you can see a rationale for bureaucrats to intervene.
I cant imagine, though, what excuse regulators came up with when they decided to limit the variety of condom sizes. Maybe this is a literal example of the one-size-fits-all mentality of Washington?
And isnt it embarrassing that Europeans have a more market-friendly approach on this issue?
Though none of us should be surprised that the Keystone Cops at the United Nations want to create a human right to obtain taxpayer-financed condoms.
At least Sandra Fluke will be happy about that.
P.S. Heres a Glenn McCoy cartoon about Obama and subsidized condoms.
P.P.S. Since I started this post with examples of wasteful spending, but then decided that this story might belong in the category of absurd regulation, lets close by sharing some examples of foolish red tape.
Obama just wants his cabinet and White House staff to have good fitting head wear.
I think you’ve covered all the high points.