Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DirecTV dispute: Is Weather Channel trying to have it both ways?
The Washington Post ^ | January 13, 2014 | Jason Samenow

Posted on 01/13/2014 1:29:33 PM PST by equaviator

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: equaviator

Neither will I-and since DirecTV is pay for use, and not public broadcast, the common good-whatever that is supposed to be-doesn’t mean anything. Satellite goes out in thunderstorms out her where I live, so TWC is a moot point then. Let them go network or PBS if they are so concerned about common good...


21 posted on 01/13/2014 1:44:48 PM PST by Texan5 (" You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

A breeze blew a few leaves into the pool the other day. I named it “Sam”/


22 posted on 01/13/2014 1:45:45 PM PST by 867V309 (I love potatoes-except, of course, Lena Dunham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
Looks like I won’t get the Superbowl.
Fox to Stream Super Bowl Free to U.S. Viewers.
23 posted on 01/13/2014 1:49:11 PM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

It’s not neccessary to watch the weather channel.Afterall there is Accuweather and the Weatherbell.There also is the National Weather Service.So there are plenty of choices to get your weather without the weather channel trying to push its global warming agenda down your throat.


24 posted on 01/13/2014 1:51:00 PM PST by puppypusher ( The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

I’m also bandwidth challenged. The price of living in the sticks I guess.


25 posted on 01/13/2014 1:51:17 PM PST by Lurkina.n.Learnin (This is not just stupid, we're talking Democrat stupid here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 867V309

lol


26 posted on 01/13/2014 1:52:02 PM PST by Rennes Templar (If you like your disease, you can keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

I don’t usually push for the federal government to do anything... BUT I wish the federal government would force cable companies to offer alacart programing.

I DO NOT WANT 1000 channels! only 10 of which I usually watch!


27 posted on 01/13/2014 1:54:15 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

Yeah, once upon a time, TWC actually covered the weather and did a credible job. But their ratings dropped and Comcast bought the channel from Landmark Communications, so the weather now runs third, behind global warming hysteria and various reality shows.

Personally, I hope DirecTV drops them. If you need the weather, it’s as close as your smartphone or computer. And if you need emergency info, you’ve got the same sources, plus NOAA weather radio. Additionally, a lot of local stations go wall-to-wall during severe weather and even offer a notification service for viewers. For $6 a year, I get a call to my cell phone when a tornado or severe thunderstorm warning is issued. Saturday afternoon, the call came in less than a minute after the National Weather Service issued a tornado warning for my county.

Good bye and good riddance to The Weather Channel.


28 posted on 01/13/2014 1:55:10 PM PST by ExNewsExSpook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 867V309
A breeze blew a few leaves into the pool the other day. I named it “Sam”/

Best line concerning The Weather Channel I've heard in a while, LOL!

29 posted on 01/13/2014 1:56:22 PM PST by The Cajun (Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Louie Gohmert......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
I don’t usually push for the federal government to do anything... BUT I wish the federal government would force cable companies to offer alacart programing.

While I share your sentiments about have too many channels you don't want, don't you think the long term effect of having the government involved would do even more damage to your wallet, and your freedom?

30 posted on 01/13/2014 1:59:12 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (Over production, one of the top 5 worries for the American Farmer every year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

Well... bye.


31 posted on 01/13/2014 2:00:50 PM PST by Obadiah (I Like Ted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

Surveys have shown that most people watch local news for the weather in any event. Stations pour lots of money into their weather operations as a result. TWC is nice but it is far from irreplaceable.


32 posted on 01/13/2014 2:01:02 PM PST by Colonel_Flagg (Some people meet their heroes. I raised mine. Go Army.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

I remember watching TWC during a Christmas holiday trip to Myrtle Beach, SC (1997) and all it was was some graphics and occasional replays of a guy reporting on temps, winds, wave heights and precipitation who sounded as though he was actually out there broadcasting live on the ocean in a row boat or something. They’ve certainly come a long way since then but now it’s just too damned much so...T’hell with it!


33 posted on 01/13/2014 2:14:07 PM PST by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

I did notice the Weather Nation channel that had suddenly popped up.

If anything it is more useful from a public safety standpoint, as it appears to broadcast ACTUAL WEATHER FORECASTS.

Not the TWC menu of reality nonsense like “When Man Made Global Warming Caused Typhoons Attack”.


34 posted on 01/13/2014 2:20:00 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

“Weather” in the sense that many pilots and sailors use the word: thunderstorms, high winds, flash flooding, rough seas, etc.


35 posted on 01/13/2014 2:31:37 PM PST by clintonh8r (Don't twerk me, Bro!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: equaviator
What a silly argument. If one has antenna TV or a basic (cheapest) cable plan, TWC is not included. If TWC really felt that way, they'd be a mainstream over-the-air station, also broadcast on basic cable.

Think of what they're saying. If you can't afford Direct TV or a premium cable plan, you deserve to die from bad weather.

36 posted on 01/13/2014 2:37:04 PM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
If I need to know, I look it up online. Why sit through a cycle on Weather Channel?

Exactly. And there's always the old Sam Kinison observation from back at the beginning of TWC: you could always go open the door and look outside (expletives deleted).

37 posted on 01/13/2014 2:40:30 PM PST by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

I agree. TWC is inferior to the local channels weather reports.


38 posted on 01/13/2014 2:46:14 PM PST by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative
I see.


39 posted on 01/13/2014 2:48:24 PM PST by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: equaviator
The Weather Channel, in less than 12 hours, will lose 20 million viewers

Wait a minute. 20 million viewers? That must be a huge mistake.

That a station is accessible to 20 million viewers, is not the same as the station getting that many viewers. Likely, the number of viewers is a very tiny fraction of those who do have access to the station. I have access, but I never watch it. So, neither I, nor most of those 20 million viewers, will be missing something that they never used anyway. It's like having a latrine in the back-yard that one never uses anyway. It's a waste, and could be gotten rid of with no consequences.
40 posted on 01/13/2014 2:50:19 PM PST by adorno (Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson